Re: [Vo]:Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples

2011-07-19 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: 1 minute after turn off, boiling was mostly stopped. T1 99.7 ~ 99.8°C (marginally hotter than before turn off, because the metal pot was still hot). T2 98.7°C 2 minutes after turn off. T1 99.3°C, T2 97.7°C 7

Re: [Vo]:Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples

2011-07-19 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: I forgot to mention there were ~2 L of water in the pot. I wrote: 3 Omega GT-736590 thermometers, red liquid, total immersion, -10 to 100°C, marked in 1°C increments Correction: -10 to 110°C Regarding the

Re: [Vo]:Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples

2011-07-19 Thread Daniel Rocha
200W from the hose and 200W from the e cat structure, at lest. 100Watt to heat the water 0.3g/s. So, if the output looked like a 800W steam from a stove, we have 500W of excess power. Could be more, but probably Rossi didn't want to harm Krivit, just show that steam was being made.

Re: [Vo]:Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples

2011-07-19 Thread Joshua Cude
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: 200W from the hose Maybe. and 200W from the e cat structure, at lest. I don't believe it. Rossi never claims it, and this 200W would figure in his power calculation (the losses in the hose don't), and he never

Re: [Vo]:Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples

2011-07-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
I forgot to mention there were ~2 L of water in the pot. I wrote: 3 Omega GT-736590 thermometers, red liquid, total immersion, -10 to 100°C, marked in 1°C increments Correction: -10 to 110°C Regarding the heat-after-death event that Brown observed, I am assuming -- or pretending, really --