In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:48:34 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
or the Sun's magnetic field reverses every 11 years, which is
the true cause
of the sunspots.
If that's the sole cause, then how is it we get big sunspots at the
reversal point, when the ?
Perhaps
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:34:50 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Note that the determination of what the Sun is spewing out is probably based
upon spectroscopic evidence, and as Mills has already pointed out, at least
one
Hydrino line is easily
Horace Heffner wrote:
This is also evidence for the notion that sunspots are caused by
asteroids or comets hitting the sun. Some will have a high iron
content. Few people understand the consequences of the enormous
energy gained by bodies approaching the sun.
Interesting post
Interesting, how is the 11 year periodicity of the sunspots explained in this
theory?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:D2 direct to Fe ?
Horace Heffner wrote
On Jun 4, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Interesting, how is the 11 year periodicity of the sunspots
explained in this theory?
Jovian trash haulers peak their trash dumping into the sun every 11
years, or ...
Jupiter perturbs a high eccentricity asteroid band once per orbit,
. Ditto for solar irradiance.
- Original Message -
From: thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:D2 direct to Fe ?
Horace Heffner wrote:
This is also evidence for the notion that sunspots are caused by
asteroids
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Note that the determination of what the Sun is spewing out is probably based
upon spectroscopic evidence, and as Mills has already pointed out, at least one
Hydrino line is easily confused with an Fe line. Now which is more likely to be
present on the Sun in large
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:19:03 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
or the Sun's magnetic field reverses every 11 years, which is the true cause
of the sunspots.
On Jun 4, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Interesting, how is the 11 year periodicity of the sunspots
On Jun 5, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 5 Jun 2007 02:19:03
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
or the Sun's magnetic field reverses every 11 years, which is
the true cause
of the sunspots.
If that's the sole cause, then how is it we get
Xavier at Blaze Labs has just uploaded 2 interesting NASA files, which
give further strong evidence AGAINST the standard view of a mostly
hydrogen sun, and/or of hydrogen fusing into helium being the only
important nuclear reaction-- and which NASA has removed from public view
(for whatever
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:33 AM
To: vortex; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Vo]:D2 direct to Fe ?
Xavier at Blaze Labs has just uploaded 2 interesting NASA files, which
give further strong evidence AGAINST the standard view of a mostly
hydrogen sun, and/or of hydrogen fusing into helium
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:33:06 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Heavy metals, particularly iron, have been confirmed by a NASA solar
mission, squirting out of the sun in Solar Flares in amounts which are
up to 10,000 times higher than predicted. The results are evidence in
On Jun 4, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
Xavier at Blaze Labs has just uploaded 2 interesting NASA files, which
give further strong evidence AGAINST the standard view of a mostly
hydrogen sun, and/or of hydrogen fusing into helium being the only
important nuclear reaction-- and
13 matches
Mail list logo
