On 30 November 2011 06:10, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
So far I haven't found anything significantly wrong with the 1 MW
demo. Also I still don't understand your instantaneous power
transfer discontinuity argument.
It's pretty simple: you have a large quantity of water - about
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand, if boiling begins at 11:00, then the power
increase should be Pdot = 2Q/t^2 = 31 W/s, giving a power of
31*144*60 = 270 kW at 13:22.
Indeed, I got that wrong, 160 W/s doesn't make sense, but 45
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 November 2011 06:10, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
So far I haven't found anything significantly wrong with the 1 MW
demo. Also I still don't understand your instantaneous power
transfer
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
I could have made a mistake, but by my calculations, if the power
increases at a constant Pdot = 160 W/s, then 13.5 L of water (per
unit) will begin to boil in t = sqrt(2Q/Pdot) = 40 minutes, not 90.
And the power at
I was curious about JC's claims about the temperature profile during
the warm-up period. Since no one seems to be doing that (or did I
miss something?) I have started analyzing the Oct. 28th temperature
data in more detail.
I believe the data shows that initially the reactors are off, contain
5 matches
Mail list logo
