Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done
correctly: eg
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2011/ICCF16/pres/ET01Grabowski-RobustPerformanceValidation.pdf
Their methodology is pretty much what I've been insisting (except that I
didn't require a dummy electric-heater
Alan sez:
Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly:
Yes,
Get over it.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Alan sez:
Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly:
Yes,
Get over it.
My thoughts exactly!
Alan: if you want to see a test in which EVERYTHING is done the way YOU
want it, TRY DOING IT YOURSELF. Stop expecting other
At 10:57 AM 5/5/2011, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly:
Yes,
snark=ON
Sorry, I thought vortex was a scientific list, not a religious one.
snark=OFF
Alan sez:
Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done
correctly:
Yes,
snark=ON
Sorry, I thought vortex was a scientific list, not a religious one.
snark=OFF
Hi Alan,
Jed has already posted a few suggestions on the matter of getting what
you think you deserve in
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_frames_v331.php
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v331.pdf
Updated conclusion :
Two new tests were run in April. These definitely rule out a
Tarallo fake. The experimental setup was adequate, but
since the eCat was NOT unwrapped the time of the run was
that this technology
is a fake. It is not rational in my opinion.
From: Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 1:18:38 PM
Subject: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated
http://lenr.qumbu.com
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
I do not know why some people keep bringing up the notion that this
technology is a fake. It is not rational in my opinion.
It seems odd to me, as well. I am much more worried about other aspects of
the technology, such as:
37 devices blew up; the
: Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
I do not know why some people keep bringing up the notion that this technology
is a fake. It is not rational in my opinion.
It seems odd to me, as well. I am much more worried
9 matches
Mail list logo