Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-05 Thread Alan J Fletcher
Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly: eg http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2011/ICCF16/pres/ET01Grabowski-RobustPerformanceValidation.pdf Their methodology is pretty much what I've been insisting (except that I didn't require a dummy electric-heater

Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-05 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Alan sez: Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly: Yes, Get over it. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: Alan sez: Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly: Yes, Get over it. My thoughts exactly! Alan: if you want to see a test in which EVERYTHING is done the way YOU want it, TRY DOING IT YOURSELF. Stop expecting other

Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-05 Thread Alan J Fletcher
At 10:57 AM 5/5/2011, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly: Yes, snark=ON Sorry, I thought vortex was a scientific list, not a religious one. snark=OFF

Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-05 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Alan sez: Is it too much to ask for ONE TEST in which EVERYTHING is done correctly: Yes, snark=ON Sorry, I thought vortex was a scientific list, not a religious one. snark=OFF Hi Alan, Jed has already posted a few suggestions on the matter of getting what you think you deserve in

[Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-02 Thread Alan J Fletcher
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_frames_v331.php http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v331.pdf Updated conclusion : Two new tests were run in April. These definitely rule out a Tarallo fake. The experimental setup was adequate, but since the eCat was NOT unwrapped the time of the run was

Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-02 Thread noone noone
that this technology is a fake. It is not rational in my opinion. From: Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 1:18:38 PM Subject: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated http://lenr.qumbu.com

Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote: I do not know why some people keep bringing up the notion that this technology is a fake. It is not rational in my opinion. It seems odd to me, as well. I am much more worried about other aspects of the technology, such as: 37 devices blew up; the

Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated

2011-05-02 Thread noone noone
: Re: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote: I do not know why some people keep bringing up the notion that this technology is a fake. It is not rational in my opinion. It seems odd to me, as well. I am much more worried