AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fukushima much worse than imagined
Fear-mongering? LOL. Apparently Alain does not look at the dates of these
attempts at what are essentially PR, many of which were sanitized and put into
circulation by TEPCO or their insurance carrier. The company
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The boars seem pretty healthy despite their contaminated tissue. I am not
> sure if that is good news or bad news.
>
Exposure to (natural) radiation used to be thought to be beneficial to
people's health. I wonder
I wrote:
> That's a different isotope. That's U-235. There are not a million pounds
> of U-235 in basement of the plant, and what there is mixed in with U-238.
>
U-235 is 4% of the fuel in a reactor. It is 0.7 of natural uranium.
> Again, you can't take the Pu because it is mixed in with
This link might help with the flurry of nonsense in the Vortex
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/dementia/agitation-elderly
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 4:47 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fukushima much worse than imagined
Jones
Jones Beene wrote:
> The Fukushima nuclear plant is missing 600 tons of highly radioactive,
> melted uranium. That is no exaggeration. Google it.
>
> Yup, way over a million pounds. A small warhead requires around 50 pounds.
>
That's a different isotope. That's U-235.
Here is the bottom-line fact that should scare everyone, even those
fearless fission advocates who can accept an occasional Chernobyl and
TMI is the regrettable part of the package-deal for cheap power.
The Fukushima nuclear plant is missing 600 tons of highly radioactive,
melted uranium.
Another one bites the dust
It’s now at least the seventh robot to have broken down while investigating
> Fukushima’s nuclear reactors, which remain highly radioactive. *Reuters* had
> counted up to five by March 2016
>
Here are two other frightening data points.
1. Some years ago, NHK (national TV) had a special on the effect on
wildlife in Fukushima Pref. There has been a tremendous increase in the
animal population because humans evacuated farmland. It is all growing back
into forest. That part is okay. But
question is the distance,
it is well explained, especially in extremetech article.
there changed the distance, and the measure changed.
anyway, on this subject too, there is bubbles.
I'm tired.
2017-02-18 20:00 GMT+01:00 Jones Beene :
>
> Fear-mongering? LOL. Apparently
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> Worst of all - 5 years from now, the situation could be more toxic, since
> it appears 3 completely unconstrained cores are converting fertile uranium
> into fissile plutonium at an unexpected rate. Again, if a
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUYFzBq3VU
PBS Nova Nuclear Meltdown Disaster
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.1200.pdf
Detecting Special Nuclear Material Using Muon-Induced Neutron Emission
Muon imaging could help image the meltdown cores at meltdown sites.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017
Fear-mongering? LOL. Apparently Alain does not look at the dates of
these attempts at what are essentially PR, many of which were sanitized
and put into circulation by TEPCO or their insurance carrier. The
company has been caught in many outright lies since the accident and
this is more of
to relativize the fearmongering
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/nuclear/high-fukushima-radiation-estimates-no-surprise-to-experts
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/243904-fukushimas-reactor-2-far-radioactive-previously-realized-no-sign-containment-breach
Fukushima much worse than imagined - 3 cores in runaway meltdown with no
chance to stop them. China syndrome in reverse...
Makes Chernobyl look like spilled milk
http://www.environews.tv/world-news/alert-new-radiation-readings-fukushima-reactor-2-unimaginable-lethal-1-min/
How long before the
14 matches
Mail list logo