occurs
with an atom and the orbiting electron.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: puthoff puth...@earthtech.org
Sent: Mon, Aug 5, 2013 9:32 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Mark,
Just finished
hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 7, 2013 12:08 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
It could be that charge as a static entity is fundamentally an
illusion. Perhaps it is a useful illusion, but it is still an illusion.
Notice that the coulomb, the unit
: Wed, Aug 7, 2013 12:08 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
It could be that charge as a static entity is fundamentally an illusion.
Perhaps it is a useful illusion, but it is still an illusion.
Notice that the coulomb, the unit of charge, is defined in terms of Amperes X
Seconds.
http
feature of quantum ground states.
[/snip]
Fran
_
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2013 12:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Dammit Fran, ya made me leave the Dimebox
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:21 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Under normal/usual circumstances, when the atom enters the narrow Casimir
channel it gives up some of its E to the ZPF, and when it exits, it ‘springs
back’ to normal ground-state -- NO overall gain or loss; COE still
:51 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:21 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
Under normal/usual circumstances, when the atom enters the narrow
Casimir channel it gives up some of its E to the ZPF, and when it
exits, it 'springs
and the orbiting electron.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: puthoff puth...@earthtech.org
Sent: Mon, Aug 5, 2013 9:32 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Mark,
Just finished Puthoff’s 2012 paper
of quantum ground states. [/snip] .
Fran
_
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2013 12:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Dammit Fran, ya made me leave the Dimebox
_
*From:* MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.netzeropo...@charter.net]
*Sent:* Sunday, August 04, 2013 12:35 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Dammit Fran, ya made me leave the Dimebox Saloon to go look up the refs…
Good news is that my
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: puthoff puth...@earthtech.org
Sent: Mon, Aug 5, 2013 9:32 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Mark,
Just finished Puthoff’s 2012 paper and although I like his conclusion below I
still feel he is avoiding giving credit to the creation and annihilation of
pairs
, August 03, 2013 7:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Mark, I think Puthoff fell short in suggesting ZPE keeps the electron and
nucleus spatially separated.. Jan Naudts 2005 paper on relativistic hydrogen
suggests f/h is relativistic based on Casimir suppression
_
From: Frank roarty
...just staying with Ni and f/h would this hypothesis be
consistent with the anomalous spectrum emitted? Would this f/h acting as a
heavy electron give off photons
the 8-ball on this?
Has this been proposed yet?
-Mark Iverson
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 7:23 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 1:03 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
I think it was Puthoff who suggested that a continual interaction (xchng of
E?) between the ZPF and electrons is what maintains them at some distance
from the nucleus. Well, when atoms find themselves in a Casimir
_
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 1:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Jones/Fran,
Wish I had time to read more; my vortex folder has 560 unread msgs! This
may have been suggested before
Is Kim saying a cold fusion bomb is possible?
Look at slide 31
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36783/TheoreticalAnalysisReactionMechanisms.pdf?sequence=1
-
warning !
Instabilities may occur, if the deuterium density (pressure) is increased
too
This is not a Defkalion factoid because they never use D.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:29 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Kim saying a cold fusion bomb is possible?
Look at slide 31
WOW Professor Kim shouldn't have put the Purdue University logo on the
slides like that. It almost looks like Purdue University is partnering
with Defkalion.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Tip :
Interesting, a search of
defkalion site:purdue.edu on google, comes up with two hits.
One of them is a message from Kim to his colleagues, and the other hit
defkalion seems to have been scrubbed from the website.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:19 AM, blaze spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Perhaps, what we need to worry about is about the miniaturization of
conventional explosives rather than the proliferation of thermonuclear
weapons.
Suppose a cold fusion bomb with the explosive power of the daisy cutter
could be carried in a backpack?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_upy14pesi4
From: H Veeder
Is Kim saying a cold fusion bomb is possible?
Look at slide 31
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36783/TheoreticalA
nalysisReactionMechanisms.pdf?sequence=1
This
..could the fractional value change states while still acting as a
heavy electron?
Fran
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 7:32 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:ICCF18 Kim Slides
Tip :
http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?2243-ICCF18-paper-by-Yeong-Kim-and-Defkalion-slides-are-publishedp=5626
Page : https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/36783
Slides :
There are many more newly available.
Document repository of ICCF-18 :
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/35425/browse
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Tip :
Thanks Alan for the URL to Yeong's slides. That really helped clarify in
my mind what is happening in this device. A number of people have
mentioned how impressive the Defkalion live demonstration was, and yet
how amateurish it appears. It really wasn't an amateur presentation, far
from it.
25 matches
Mail list logo
