The link provided was wrong and was not the one
intended (for the Mallove ICCF10 pdf) which is here,
and is probably on the LENR and IE sites too:
http://www.rafoeg.de/20,Dokumentenarchiv/10,Personenbezogenes_Archiv/,Mallove_Eugene/mallove1.pdf
For the record- here is Gene Mallove's older pdf from
ICCF10 which references P Graneau, George Hathaway,
etc and provides Mallove's take on the water-arc and
other energy anomalies - and also J.P. Vigier on the
air-arc (COP = ~1.24)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TVM-4
Howdy Jones,
The destructive results of cavitation resulting in propeller metal erosion
is a good indicator of a form of the phenomena described. in this link. It's
real , the U-Tube vid demonstrates a form of this. Ditto with sonofusion,
SL, etc.
The problem has always been to both recover and
--- George
> No, I have not seen the Lindemann stuff. I'll take a
look if you can supply me with a few (Youtube?) web
addresses.
Here is the first one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlMELbK8zDQ
This video is tedious at first, but bear with it till
he sprays water on the plug in just the rig
Jones Beene wrote:
Yes- I thought that there were others who strongly
feel that the Graneau results are overblown or
non-existent. Thanks for posting that.
BTW- George, have you seen anything of particular
interest, or even seen at all, the plethora of
Lindemann-inspired "water-sparking' videos
Yes- I thought that there were others who strongly
feel that the Graneau results are overblown or
non-existent. Thanks for posting that.
BTW- George, have you seen anything of particular
interest, or even seen at all, the plethora of
Lindemann-inspired "water-sparking' videos which have
turned up
I published a rebuttal of the Graneau excess-energy claims a letter to
the editor of Infinite Energy Magazine V12 #71 2007 (pg 4). In it, I
claim that the conclusions which I published together with the Graneaus
in Jnl. of Plamsa Physics were not logically able to be derived from the
experiment
Possible correction: in digging around just now, I
have found some recent information from a researcher
who has spent a lot of time with the Graneau
experiement and thinks (strongly) that it is NOT
gainful.
There is a thread here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5135.msg112480
> If the
--- Terry:
> There are two versions of the OneCAT motor, air only
and what they are calling bi-energy. The later claims
106 mpg and works off compressed air and a little sip
of petrol.
Makes sense. It is now August and wouldn't we love to
have a video of the Tata production line spewing out
Mini
I haven't been following this air car motor at all so I don't know anything
about it but if it has a petrol engine riding tandem, so to speak, then
maybe they use the waste heat of the petrol engine to heat/expand the
compressed air and gain advantage like that? Is that a dopey thing to say?
There are two versions of the OneCAT motor, air only and what they are
calling bi-energy. The later claims 106 mpg and works off compressed
air and a little sip of petrol.
http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-news/-air-fueled-car-coming-by-2008-ar38685.html
I don't think they are in production with
--- Robin
Your analysis of the operation of the diode seems
accurate.
The addition of the water mist, and its net energy
balance, is a key point, however which no one can
forecast accurately at this point. This possibility of
it being gainful deserves more attention in a
perfect-world (if we ha
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 3 Aug 2008 19:32:00 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlMELbK8zDQ
[snip]
Initially the air in the spark gap in non-conducting, and the spark gap is a
very large resistance. So the voltage over the spark gap follows the voltage on
the
What happens if/when the compressed-air for the
Negre-Tata MiniCat purposely has a high initial
moisture content, and also incorporates an enhanced
sparking system - which is applied to the wet-air in
the engine (as if it were fuel)?
Nothing of any consequence you say?
One of these days, someone
14 matches
Mail list logo
