Has anyone looked into the details of the global GPS satellite system with
regards to how that system does not follow the laws of general and special
relativity?
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:24 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:28 PM, John Berry
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone looked into the details of the global GPS satellite system with
regards to how that system does not follow the laws of general and special
relativity?
Yes, provided you don't mean personally:
Here is a snippet from the Navy:
Quote:
In principle, the critics of GPS in the relativity debate have not been
completely wrong. The neglected 7 factor could hurt us. The OCS software
should be reformulated. Nevertheless, in practice, neglect of relativity
does not now contribute measurably to
http://ivanik3.narod.ru/GPS/Hatch/relGPS.pdf
And it is here that the Sagnac effect runs into trouble with the special
theory. The special theory by postulate and definition of time
synchronization requires
that the speed of light always be isotropic with respect to the observer.
And this is
I believe that was covered in Galilean Electrodynamics many many years ago.
-mark
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:05 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Neo-Classical Relativity
Has anyone looked into the details of the global GPS satellite
Of the six videos, this one is the most important one...
[ The Neo-classical Theory of Relativity ] Einstein's incorrect method to
synchronize clocks - case (A).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2qYCvw1UiElist=UUek3dPxFThe8FLl-ONbOeVw
...because it uses the same thought experiment described by
Sorry,
I should have included section 1 _and_ 2 from Einstein's paper. The second
section is added below.
Harry
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:39 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Of the six videos, this one is the most important one...
[ The Neo-classical Theory of Relativity ] Einstein's
John,
Forget these videos.
I just realized they are not a fair critique of special relativity because
they don't factor in the the postulate of the constancy of light speed.
Harry
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:53 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry,
I should have included section 1
I agree that video is not terribly useful.
Here is an argument against Einstein's scheme of synchronization.
Please correct me if you think I am misrepresenting it.
We have 3 points in a straight line labelled A, B and C with an equal
distance between B and it's 2 neighbours.
A pulse of light
John,
Einstein's conception of simultaneity follows a procedure. The first step
in this procedure is to establish clock synchronization in one frame of
reference in isolation from a moving system. However, it occurred to me
that this first step is not necessary. Instead it is possible to imagine
Yes, but you will have fun trying to visualize this with SR.
SR assumes that each sees the other as length contracted, as clock A and A'
pass an observer on each frame at A and A' would disagree as to how long
the other is, and hence both would insist that the other ship is shorter ad
view that B
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:28 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but you will have fun trying to visualize this with SR.
SR assumes that each sees the other as length contracted, as clock A and
A' pass an observer on each frame at A and A' would disagree as to how long
the
http://www.neoclassicalrelativity.org/
There are 6 simple videos showing arguments against various parts of
Special Relativity.
http://www.youtube.com/user/NeoclassicRelativity
13 matches
Mail list logo
