RE: [Vo]:Newbie

2013-06-04 Thread William Beaty
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Roger B wrote: That is a description, not a rule. Debunking and pathological skepticism is banned. Perhaps I should add "if you don't identify as True Believer, the owner might remove you at any time." But vortex is not a CF list. If someone is a electric-water-vorte

Re: [Vo]:Newbie

2013-06-04 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:58 PM, William Beaty wrote: The > x-ray laser backscatter CIA satellites are imaging your brain right now, you > know? Their beams are pulsed to cleverly mimic cosmic ray background on a > gm counter, but I know better, I KNOW! I told you to keep your tin foil hat well

Re: [Vo]:Newbie

2013-06-04 Thread William Beaty
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Roger B wrote: I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are allowed here, I should also be accepted. Hm, better read MODERATOR message.Deal harshwy with those that transgwess the unwritten lawr. But it's not unwritten: http://amasci.co

RE: [Vo]:Newbie

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
LENR+, not skeptopaths. 10 years ago I was in a lot of health forums. I learned the hard way that there really are skeptopaths; it really is an illness. I hope to avoid them here. Roger > Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 18:59:58 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Newbie > From: hohlr...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]:Newbie

2013-06-04 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Roger B wrote: > I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are > allowed here, I should also be accepted. > > I think a simple way to deal with skeptopaths is to make a rule that no one > may be here who does not accept the reality of LENR

[Vo]:Newbie

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are allowed here, I should also be accepted. I think a simple way to deal with skeptopaths is to make a rule that no one may be here who does not accept the reality of LENR. There are plenty of forums where disbelievers in LE