wrote:
>
> >right. In other words, the overhead is small; 1 MJ of electricity produces
> >enough hydrogen to generate 5e13 MJ of heat.
> >
> I think you have dropped about 7 orders of magnitude. ;)
I wouldn't put it past me. I think I was looking at the numbers for D+D
fusion.
Anyway, it's a l
wrote:
> ...I think we have been here before. You can just carry water in the
> vehicle,
> and electrolyze it in situ, a minute quantity at a time, as required.
> There need
> be no stored gas, and no danger.
>
Mizuno and others who know a lot about hydrogen tell me that might be
problematic. I
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:42:22 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>right. In other words, the overhead is small; 1 MJ of electricity produces
>enough hydrogen to generate 5e13 MJ of heat.
>
I think you have dropped about 7 orders of magnitude. ;) You have a ratio of
1:5e13.
It sho
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:42:22 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>In actual applications I would expect each factory making cold fusion
>engines or power supplies to generate their own purified hydrogen, or to
>bring in a tank of hydrogen every week or so. The hydrogen source in a
Lennart Thornros wrote:
Jed with your numbers, which I am sure you have right . . .
>
No necessarily! You should not trust my arithmetic. I sometimes drop 1 or 2
orders of magnitude.
. . . it seems to me that nuclear power is great for H production when we
> implemented LENR on a local level.
Jed with your numbers, which I am sure you have right, it seems to me that
nuclear power is great for H production when we implemented LENR on a local
level. Those mega investment that never can be economically sound could get
a second life.
I think if you are in France solar is an alternative late
Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
> Regarding generating a hydrogen infrastructure, many years ago I recall
> Dr. Peter Zimmerman (Dr. Mills' worst nemesis) claiming we should redirect
> many of our nuclear plants towards the primary task of cracking H2O into
> hydrogen.
>
No can do. Nuc
Jones sez:
...
> Having a bank roll of $200 billion in liquid assets will let you do
> crazy things like move all the way from computeres into automotive
> - when the time is right. I suppose they could just buy Toyota and
> be done with it.
LOL!
GOOD example of having lots of mo
For some time to come, fuel cells for portable products will be just a
novelty/stunt. In the best case scenario, they are a battery charger
supplying constant current because they are much harder to throttle than a
lithium battery, particularly as they get miniaturized. A serious problem
for port
Apple is at it again - this time with hydrogen - first to power the iphone,
and then the driverless car.
A UK research company with 900 patents, Intelligent Energy - is tied to
Apple in a similar hidden way as ARM, which designs the iphone chips. Having
a bank roll of $200 billion in liquid assets
10 matches
Mail list logo