t;
Sent: Thu, Nov 5, 2015 10:41 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium
FYI:
All, please take a close look at Fig. 2 of this Holmlid Paper:
http://fuelrfuture.com/science/holm2.pdf
I think it will help explain how Holmlid had viewed/grasped the energylevels
back in early
Fran, are you thinking that this is a form of zero point energy?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Nov 6, 2015 7:21 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuteriu
Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 8:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium
It’s very difficult to keep the terminology consistent.
I think Holmlid would be wise to ditch the present designations and start over
I wrote:
please take a close look at Fig. 2 of this Holmlid Paper:
http://fuelrfuture.com/science/holm2.pdf
[along with other stuff including an explanation of the figure]
to which Dave replied:
I assume that any significant energy release must be due to true fusion
since the
Bob Cook wrote:
Holmlid does not refer to normal molecular hydrogen as H(0) as best I can tell
from reading his paper. I would think that normal
molecular hydrogen could have more than one orbital spin state for its two
electrons. Thus, a notation of H(0) would not be correct
for some normal
berson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 10:20 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium
Fran, are you thinking that this is a form of zero point energy?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X
<fran
@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Re: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium
It’s very difficult to keep the terminology consistent.
I think Holmlid would be wise to ditch the present designations and start over.
From: Mark Jurich
FYI:
All, please take a close look at Fig. 2 of this Holmlid
It’s very difficult to keep the terminology consistent.
I think Holmlid would be wise to ditch the present designations and start over.
From: Mark Jurich
FYI:
All, please take a close look at Fig. 2 of this Holmlid Paper:
http://fuelrfuture.com/science/holm2.pdf
I think
FYI:
All, please take a close look at Fig. 2 of this Holmlid Paper:
http://fuelrfuture.com/science/holm2.pdf
I think it will help explain how Holmlid had viewed/grasped the energy levels
back in early 2014. Also keep in mind that H(-1) is
now called H(0). It was thought that the apparent
9 matches
Mail list logo
