Re: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-15 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:14 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Or just ride your bike... http://koin.com/2014/09/05/electric-bike-battery-may-have-caused-bend-house-fire/ I have been studying the 18650, the cell which powers the Tesla. Proper charging of the cell is a far cry from

RE: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-15 Thread Robert Ellefson
then, I'll just presume this to be artifact. -Bob From: Robert Ellefson Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 5:29 PM Subject: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor Given the results of the SIMS analysis from the Lugano report, particularly as detailed in this posting: http://www.mail-archive.com

[Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread Robert Ellefson
Given the results of the SIMS analysis from the Lugano report, particularly as detailed in this posting: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg98596.html I believe that it is possible to evaluate the nuclear activity of candidate fuel samples simply by sputter-cleaning them as

RE: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread Jones Beene
Bob, Just so you know, your insight is not being ignored - although you may reasonably suspect it is, since there are few comments. Lots of people are trying to come to grips with this data, as preposterous as it may seem at first glance. But the main problem remains: these are very energetic

RE: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread Jones Beene
BTW Bob - you suggested a simple way to look for the Ni+Li reaction. There is a simpler way yet... get hold of some those exploding lithium batteries... you know ... the one's with nickel electrodes. Look for 69Ga in the debris field of the next Boeing Dreamliner crash. Krivit is on the case

Re: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: BTW Bob - you suggested a simple way to look for the Ni+Li reaction. There is a simpler way yet... get hold of some those exploding lithium batteries... you know ... the one's with nickel electrodes. Or just ride the bus:

Re: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread ChemE Stewart
Or just ride your bike... http://koin.com/2014/09/05/electric-bike-battery-may-have-caused-bend-house-fire/ On Tuesday, October 14, 2014, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net javascript:; wrote: BTW Bob - you suggested a

RE: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: Terry Blanton Jones Beene wrote: BTW Bob - you suggested a simple way to look for the Ni+Li reaction. There is a simpler way yet... get hold of some those exploding lithium batteries... you know ... the one's with nickel electrodes. Or just ride the bus:

Re: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread ChemE Stewart
In general, I think it is not a good idea to fly plastic fuselage airplanes with lithium batteries @ 42,000 feet up near the ionosphere... On Tuesday, October 14, 2014, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton Jones Beene wrote: BTW Bob - you

RE: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread Jones Beene
How long will it be before the dreaded Ni-62 bombe (best Inspector Clouseau accent) From: ChemE Stewart In general, I think it is not a good idea to fly plastic fuselage airplanes with lithium batteries @ 42,000 feet up near the ionosphere... From: Terry Blanton Jones Beene wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread ChemE Stewart
Are you implying exploding pennies? On Tuesday, October 14, 2014, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: How long will it be before the dreaded Ni-62 bombe (best Inspector Clouseau accent) *From:* ChemE Stewart In general, I think it is not a good idea to fly plastic fuselage

RE: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread Jones Beene
Nah… that’s Randy’s gig. Say, in case it hasn’t dawned on ya’ … using up most of your Li-7 with nickel – which makes the ratio decrease compared Li-6 … this makes it look like you have converted Li-7 to Li-6 which is not the case. It still costs a helluva a lot to make power this way.

Re: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor

2014-10-14 Thread Axil Axil
When the latest TPT is analyzed in the light of what happens in the context of an E-Cat reactor melt down, things start to make sense. Let us remember what the E-Cat meltdown is all about as follows: James Bowery December 28th, 2013 at 7:54 PM Dr. Rossi, When you say that reactors “explode”