i'd have to look at that very carefully in light of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbr0fQfJC-8
He cites some compelling reasons it might be busted, but, you never know.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 03:12, Terry Blanton wrote:
> It's Back...LK-99 second chance? Silicon?
>
>
> https://www.tomsh
It's Back...LK-99 second chance? Silicon?
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/lk-99-patent-update-suggest-it-could-work
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:25 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
> And a new candidate with "dancing" Cooper pairs.
>
>
> https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-identify-a-strange-new-f
And a new candidate with "dancing" Cooper pairs.
https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-identify-a-strange-new-form-of-superconductivity
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 8:31 PM Jonathan Berry
wrote:
> Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end
> down.
>
> This suggests one
Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end down.
This suggests one of 2 things, they either made a ferromagnetic material
not a superconductor.
OR, they made a superconductor that is only superconductive at one end.
So a tiny bit of contamination only occurred at that
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:13:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Two down
>
>https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/
...maybe the impurities are what it's all about. Clearly the substance they
produced behaved remarkably like a
superconductor.
Two down
https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023, 7:37 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> One down, one to go.
>
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/15/science/retraction-ranga-dias-rochester.html
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 6:33 PM Terry Blanton wro
One down, one to go.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/15/science/retraction-ranga-dias-rochester.html
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 6:33 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> Sound is sound. Energy changes with frequency.
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023, 12:47 PM Andrew Meulenberg
> wrote:
>
>> Phonons are important to
Sound is sound. Energy changes with frequency.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023, 12:47 PM Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
> Phonons are important to the CF process; but, the ultrasound might provide
> organized pressure waves to align defects into CF productive structures.
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 10:34 AM Terry
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:06:38 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I think there have been studies on phonons in CF. You might search Jed's
>web site.
Look at the work done by a.o. Russ George.
Buy electric cars and recharge them from solar panels on your roof.
Phonons are important to the CF process; but, the ultrasound might provide
organized pressure waves to align defects into CF productive structures.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 10:34 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
> I think there have been studies on phonons in CF. You might search Jed's
> web site.
>
> On
I think there have been studies on phonons in CF. You might search Jed's
web site.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023, 10:57 AM Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
> Robin, Good suggestion in your BTW.
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 2:57 PM Robin
> wrote:
>
>> In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Sat, 5 Aug 2023 14:
Robin, Good suggestion in your BTW.
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 2:57 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Sat, 5 Aug 2023 14:41:18 -0500:
> Hi Andrew,
> [snip]
> >Robin, Your strained lattices might also be the answer to useful CF.
>
> Please feel free to pursue it. It's way
In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Sat, 5 Aug 2023 14:41:18 -0500:
Hi Andrew,
[snip]
>Robin, Your strained lattices might also be the answer to useful CF.
Please feel free to pursue it. It's way beyond my means to do so.
BTW, it can be enhanced by introducing a forced ultrasound vibratio
Robin, Your strained lattices might also be the answer to useful CF.
_ _ _
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 3:38 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:32:07 +
> (UTC):
> Hi,
>
> You may recall that years ago, I suggested on this list that strained
> lattices migh
Super conduction (SC) is a complex field. First the old cooper pair
model is invalid for most cases as shown by Hirsch.
The physical reality more looks like evolving spin currents (=EM flux
only) that seemlessly explains why field lines cannot penetrate an SC:
From this it is clear that a fu
Two bit da Vinci...yeah worth about 25¢
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023, 8:19 PM Jones Beene wrote:
>
> the arm-chair physicists out there seem to be positing "a new kind of
> superconductivity" rather than, you know
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLr95AFBRXI
>
>
>
> Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>
the arm-chair physicists out there seem to be positing "a new kind of
superconductivity" rather than, you know
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLr95AFBRXI
Terry Blanton wrote:
Rendered Invalid
https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2023/08/03/business/tech/Korea-Quantum-Energy-R
Rendered Invalid
https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2023/08/03/business/tech/Korea-Quantum-Energy-Research-Centre-superconductor/20230803184638075.html
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:49 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008?s=09
>
>
>
>
>
original url (not firewalled, requires registration)
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384782-room-temperature-superconductor-breakthrough-met-with-scepticism/
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:30 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> From New Scientist (for list use only, firewalled)
>
> https://archive.ph/kI
>From New Scientist (for list use only, firewalled)
https://archive.ph/kIX9s
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 4:38 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:32:07 +
> (UTC):
> Hi,
>
> You may recall that years ago, I suggested on this list that strained
> lattices m
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:32:07 + (UTC):
Hi,
You may recall that years ago, I suggested on this list that strained lattices
might result in a preferential vibration
direction for the atoms of the lattice (Bose condensate of phonons). That in
turn leads to vibr
This story turns out to have been around the net for a long time
It appeared in the record as a compound named LK-99 = Lee-Kim (1999):
IOW - they discovered it nearly a quarter of a century ago.. makes one wonder
if this post is not an odd troll
Not to mention, an unreasonable time to isolate,
Well, ask Stanley. You'd need a medium to ask Martin.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023, 2:56 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> It won't get published if it can't be replicated. Ask Fleischman. He
> should have told everyone where he got his electrodes.
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023, 2:10 PM MSF wrote:
>
>> This disco
It won't get published if it can't be replicated. Ask Fleischman. He
should have told everyone where he got his electrodes.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023, 2:10 PM MSF wrote:
> This discovery is truly remarkable for more than one reason. You have to
> wonder about the thought process that led these guys
This discovery is truly remarkable for more than one reason. You have to wonder
about the thought process that led these guys to this particular method.
Another thing is that there are no exotic materials used. Practically anyone
who read this paper could reproduce the results unless some essent
There have been other claimants - this is not the first but it may become the
first to be fully replicated and notably it shows the Meissner effect which
most of the others did not,
The affiliation of the authors is not clear
The Superconductor is Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O (a common mineral) showing levit
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008?s=09
27 matches
Mail list logo
