There is a human emotion associated with the concept of monism that I once
experienced after consuming the fruiting body of the mycelia of psilocybe
cubensis, a product from bovine feces found in south Georgia, among other
places, after a warm rainfall. It was the prevailing meme of the 60s, and
The recurring concept of monism:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-more-physicists-are-starting-to-think-space-and-time-are-illusions
*Nathan Seiberg, a leading string theorist at the Institute for Advanced
Study at Princeton, is not alone in his sentiment when he states, “I’m
almost certain
I wrote:
> 1. The water is liquid at 103 deg C when *it is under pressure*, not at
> normal pressure.
>
This happens at 4 psi.
https://durathermfluids.com/pdf/techpapers/pressure-boiling-point.pdf
103 deg C = 217 deg F
4 psi = 0.3 bar
This is not particularly high. An ordinary kitchen
This is a grotesque distortion of what I and others have said. Gluck wrote:
Otherwise emphasis was on who coined "Rossi Planet" and and we also could
learn that water is only water at 103C at normal pressure, in pipes trying
desperately to be half-full (the other half is probably, but not surely,
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-05-2016-lenr-one-comment-some-info.html
best wishes,
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/04/apr-01-2016-lenr-1-comment-some-news.html
Happy April 1- and happy all days my friends!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:46:47 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/apollo-10-astronauts-reported-unexplaine
>d-music-at-moon_us_56c80662e4b0928f5a6c0679
My guess would be solar corona radio waves.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/apollo-10-astronauts-reported-unexplaine
d-music-at-moon_us_56c80662e4b0928f5a6c0679
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:diversity, one of the 6 pillars of LENR
See inline ...
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A sign that the nickel power is not working is the explosions that
are occurring when the LENR reactions begin in the nano particles produced
This is not true. There are many physical and chemical thing happening
that set the stage for LENR, and just because the stage has been set, it
doesn't mean the show started. The chemical changes are the dissociation
of the LiAlH4 and the dissolving of the Ni (at higher temperatures). The
This is a wonderful video, so thanks for pointing us to watch it. However,
the molten Li-Al is not in a super-critical phase, but as he said, it
doesn't have to be supercritical - just hot and high pressure. He also
demonstrated a chemical mixing that produced nanoparticles as a
precipitate.
One of the things not sampled in the Lugano experiment is the product gas
or gas ash. This may have very important clues to the nature of the
reaction. In my replication (under construction), I intend to be able to
collect the product gas for analysis off-site. We could find enhanced
deuterium,
Dear Friends,
Daily News focused on the Hot Cat, Axil's explanation and a few thoughts
about unity or diversity in LENR-.all here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/03/seeking-truth-and-power-of-lenr.html
New replications at the horizon. Murphy, you never sleep?
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Clauzon ; Roberto Germano ; Roy Virgilio ; Sunwon Park ; vlad ; VORTEX ; Mark
Tsirlin ; Steve Katinski ; David Daggett ; Valerio Ciampoli ; Peter Bjorkbom ;
Peter Schlosser
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:55 AM
Subject: [Vo]:diversity, one of the 6 pillars of LENR
Dear Friends
peter.bjork...@neofire.com ; Peter
Schlosser schloss...@t-online.de
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:55 AM
*Subject:* [Vo]:diversity, one of the 6 pillars of LENR
Dear Friends,
Daily News focused on the Hot Cat, Axil's explanation and a few thoughts
about unity or diversity in LENR-.all here
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:diversity, one of the 6 pillars of LENR
Bob,
Your mixing apples and oranges. The Lagano test has nothing to do with the
latest Dr. Parkhomov's experiment
v.ciamp...@gmail.com ; Peter Bjorkbom peter.bjork...@neofire.com ; Peter
Schlosser schloss...@t-online.de
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:55 AM
*Subject:* [Vo]:diversity, one of the 6 pillars of LENR
Dear Friends,
Daily News focused on the Hot Cat, Axil's explanation and a few thoughts
about
Parkhomov's test?
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:43 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:diversity, one of the 6 pillars of LENR
Bob,
Your mixing apples and oranges. The Lagano test has
, however the extent of this production of excess heat
was not very long. )
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:23 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:diversity, one of the 6 pillars of LENR
See inline
This is completely wrong. The micrographs of the Ni ash in the MFMP
experiment were the same as the Lugano Ni ash. There was no explosion in
the Lugano experiment. Also, from personal experience, when Ni is heated
in H2, it is fully oxide free by 250C and by 300C the sintering of the
particles
Axil, what you are describing as proper sized and tubercles are
applicable to Rossi's low temperature catalyzed Ni fuel. This is not what
was used in the HotCat or Parkhomov experiment. SEM images of the Ni core
from the MFMP experiment (Bang!) show that early on the Ni particles are
completely
Axil, have you looked at the SEM images (courtesy of Ed Storms) of the Ni
from the MFMP reactor?
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2fllFSWpFNVJoUlIxbERhRTE2M2FTY0s3TU9sZ2FsVG5wMGdodlE2ZW1JMVEusp=sharing
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On
In my version of the experiment, I plan to have samples of temperature,
pressure, input current and voltage, radiation count and gamma spectrum,
and then I will collect the product gas at the end for offline analysis.
Of course the Ni ash will also be collected for examination. This, plus
the
reaction prior to the bangs,
however the extent of this production of excess heat was not very long. )
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:diversity, one of the 6 pillars of LENR
By the way, Nicholas Cafarelli explained this to me.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no hydrogen plasma or lithium vapor for that matter. Lithium at
that pressure will not boil at the temperatures being used. If you read
Langmuir's work, you
Regarding: I believe that I had seen that fuel difference reported on
facebook or ECat news.
This is it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjWqx-BE4p0feature=youtu.be
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This is completely wrong. The micrographs of the Ni ash in
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Axil, what you are describing as proper sized and tubercles are
applicable to Rossi's low temperature catalyzed Ni fuel.
For a temperature of 1200C, the proper size is about 2 microns give or take.
This is not what
Yes, that is correct. We do not have an SEM of Parkhomov's Ni particles.
You don't know that they were not similar to MFMP's. However, the same
thing happened to Parkhomov's particles as the MFMP particles - they were
covered with liquid Li-Al-Ni-H at the time of the reaction and the fine
I have no problem with the surface features of the MFMP nickel powder. The
comparison was between Lagano and the latest Dr. Parkhomov's experiment of
the 27th/28th February.
Where is the micrograph of that Russian powder?
Your mixing apples and oranges.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Bob
I meant exactly what I said. Do I have justification? Yes. The first is
that Parkhomov's experiment appears to have worked and I don't' think he
made a specific effort to match the Lugano powder size. Second, the Ni is
dissolving into the Li-Al-H liquid metal at that temperature, removing the
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I meant exactly what I said. Do I have justification? Yes. The first is
that Parkhomov's experiment appears to have worked and I don't' think he
made a specific effort to match the Lugano powder size.
Yes the
What does this mean...
May mean that the specific nickel powder Dr Parkhomov first used is not so
important
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, that is correct. We do not have an SEM of Parkhomov's Ni particles.
You don't know that they were not
Inline below...
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I meant exactly what I said. Do I have justification? Yes. The first
is that Parkhomov's experiment appears to have worked and
The evidence says otherwise. I believe Parkhomov to be an honest
man. If the XH is never reproduced, then it would be likely that it was a
mistake.
However, the evidence shows that what Parkhomov is doing produces
features similar to Lugano HotCat and I still think the
See inline ...
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A sign that the nickel power is not working is the explosions that are
occurring when the LENR reactions begin in the nano particles produced by
lithium and hydrogen plasma as it cools from the high
There is no hydrogen plasma or lithium vapor for that matter. Lithium at
that pressure will not boil at the temperatures being used. If you read
Langmuir's work, you will see that it takes over 2500C for any significant
hydrogen molecule dissociation, and it would be much hotter still to get a
A somewhat costly state-of-the-art manned outpost of considerable size
should be established on the Moon. Not only should it be designed for
scientific
research, but also as a tourist destination. Money to support this endeavor
would come from taxes private capital, and/or tourism.
Mars One will be second anyway. ;-)
The whole story at:
http://vodo.net/pioneerone
Download for free the first 6 episodes, worth watching. If you enjoy
contribute to cover production costs of next episodes.
mic
2012/6/6 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com:
Realities shows are successful
I'm sorry, but as an engineer if you imagine that you can build a fusion
powered spacecraft with an exhaust velocity of 7.5e6m/s and 40MW of engine
power per kg of spacecraft (from rocket equation with 20% fuel use in 2
days at 1g thrust), when nobody can yet build a viable self sustaining
fusion
I say, why waste time going to Mars, when you can shoot for the stars! We
need to set our goals and/or expectations higher or farther actually. While
it would be a very cool thing to have some fellow Humans residing on Mars,
it's getting there in a vastly improved capacity that will enable
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:55:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
You don't understand the nature of technological breakthroughs do you.
I'm sorry, but as an engineer if you imagine that you can build a fusion
powered spacecraft with an exhaust velocity of 7.5e6m/s and 40MW of
Sadly I do understand, I am just not blind to the implied engineering
requirements. *40MW/kg !* The highest power to weight machines
(outside of bombs) that humans have ever build were the space shuttle main
engines, they did about 3MW/kg utilising a supply of LH2, the best possible
coolant,
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 22:49:45 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
That is a luxury you do not have
with fusion in an ultra-high Isp engine.
It is also a luxury you don't need.
The trick is to perform the reaction in space itself.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
Like Friedwart Winterberg's Supermarx concept?
http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/12/micro-fusion-for-space-propulsion-and.html
I really like the concept, but there is still no way that it can achieve
the power to weight required to give 1g at 7.5e6m/s Isp. Heat loads and
driver power requirements
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 22:49:45 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
Sadly I do understand, I am just not blind to the implied engineering
requirements. *40MW/kg !* The highest power to weight machines
(outside of bombs) that humans have ever build were the space shuttle main
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 23:40:14 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/12/micro-fusion-for-space-propulsion-and.html
At least two differences.
1) There is no explosion, but rather a continuous burn.
2) There is only very minimal photon production (when
Funded by marketing it as one big reality show... Possible?? And would you
buy a one way ticket to Mars?
http://mars-one.com/en/
Regards,
Patrick
--
Patrick
www.tRacePerfect.com
The daily puzzle everyone can finish but not everyone can perfect!
The quickest puzzle ever!
In reply to Patrick Ellul's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:10:21 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
I wrote to Elon Musk offering to help him build a fusion powered shuttle to get
us there in 2 days at 1 g with only 20% fuel mass.
No response.
Funded by marketing it as one big reality show... Possible?? And
Realities shows are successful because the success of one relies on the
humiliation and exclusion of other participants, like in the
old Coliseum. That is not possible in this mission, though, unless you kill
passengers, like in the old Coliseum.
2012/6/6 Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007OWFI3G
Frank Znidarsic
I cannot. It says: not currently available.
Andre
On 03/26/2012 06:44 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007OWFI3G
Frank Znidarsic
:12 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Buy one and help me out
I cannot. It says: not currently available.
Andre
On 03/26/2012 06:44 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007OWFI3G
Frank Znidarsic
One further point - the dimensions of the bulge only on the smallest
device - the one with the ruler scale as seen in the images indicate the
bulge is 7 cm in length and about the same 7 cm in diameter or ~260 cc in
volume, maybe more. That is without the long flanges.
If one trusted observer
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If one trusted observer (namely Levi) were to have been given a quick peek
inside the original device, back in January
1. It was not a quick peek. Who told you it was quick?
2. Others saw it too.
3. What difference does it make whether it was January,
Well I can see that Rothwell is in now full retreat - since he has started
to distort the facts to conform with his prior erroneous assumptions -
rather than doing the basic reality check and admitting that he could be
wrong.
There is no 50 CC which is relevant. There is no factuality in the
If 500 cc volume were true...
A cubed shaped reaction chamber with a volume of 50 CC that can produce a
130,000 kw heat spike would radiate at a power of 1 kilowatt per square
centimeter give or take.
The absolute black body radiation temperature of such a vessel would be
17,636,684,303
It is clear now that both of these tests were juvenile efforts at
calorimetry - below high school standards...
If Steorn, with a bunch of engineers working for it, could make a
measurement error and not spot it for a year or more, and have to
have it pointed out to them by an outside engineer,
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
There is no “50 CC” which is relevant. There is no factuality in the
Rothwell appraisal of what others saw, or what he has heard that they saw
That should be: What they told me and what they stated publicly they saw.
If Beene does not believe Levi,
peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com wrote:
It is clear now that both of these tests were juvenile efforts at
calorimetry - below high school standards...
That's not a bit clear. This is industry standard calorimetry for heating
systems of this size. These procedures are done hundreds of thousands
I am not sure about the size of E-Cat's stomach, but the foil covered animal
from janurary appears to be slightly longer from nose to tail
than the march/april animal.
Harry
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, May 8, 2011 12:38:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo
- Original Message
From: peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, May 8, 2011 1:00:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Only one size E-Cat?
If Steorn, with a bunch of engineers working for it, could make a
measurement error and not spot it for a year or more
A person can believe anything, but you do not have a rational
reason for believing this particular assertion. You cannot show
how or why they are mired in confusion, or point to any likely
error in their technique.
As I understand it, Rossi is claiming to do something that people
who know
peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com wrote:
As I understand it, Rossi is claiming to do something that people
who know a lot about this sort of thing believe is not possible.
Not quite. Rossi and several hundred others have published definitive proof
that they are doing something that some other
to the total bulge volume.
Not worth doing though ... 50cc vs 180cc isn't a significant difference.
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2011 9:48:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Only one size E-Cat?
If 500 cc volume were true...
A cubed shaped reaction
*To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent: *Sunday, May 8, 2011 9:48:59 AM
*Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Only one size E-Cat?
If 500 cc volume were true...
A cubed shaped reaction chamber with a volume of 50 CC that can produce a
130,000 kw heat spike would radiate at a power of 1 kilowatt per square
centimeter
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 8 May 2011 16:07:23 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
So Sorry, I had an order of magnitude error. But the point still applies.
The point I was trying to make was that the 130 kw heat spike could not come
from a reactor vessel with a limited surface area of a reaction
At 03:39 PM 10/23/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
If Vyosotski's work can't be replicated, okay, maybe he made some
mistakes. Science advances through mistakes. But I don't see any
sign that anyone has tried to replicate
peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com wrote:
I don't want to hijack the thread, but if Rich Lott is a [political]
nitwit, that says more about the pathetically cringing state of our society
than it does about him.
Nope. There has not been a time since 1939 when this would not have been
political
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:00:38 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Or by some
commercial enterprise which sees that a long shot could nevertheless
pay off handsomely.
If you ever find a commercial enterprise with this philosophy, please let me
know! ;)
Regards,
Robin
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
If Vyosotski's work can't be replicated, okay, maybe he made some mistakes.
Science advances through mistakes. But I don't see any sign that anyone has
tried to replicate him.
Of course no has tried to replicate him! If you are serious, you
Jed Rothwell wrote:
For a scientist to discuss it would be like a U.S.
politician going out on weekends on WWII reenactments dressed as
a member of the Waffen-SS, like this nitwit did:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/10/15/definition-of-a-bad-political-photo-op-rich-iotts-nazi-reenactment/
--- R C Macaulay wrote:
The CL2 gas released into the treated wastewater
is distributed as gas ... and is assumed to
transition from chlorine to a type of hydrochlorous
acid ...
Isn't it amazing, Richard, when science can clone a
mammal and put a cat on Mars ;-) that some of these
very simple
Vortexians:
Sterling Allen is reporting on the death of yet another energy machine
researcher. It has all the characters. Dr? Tom Bearden, a heart
disrupter weapon, a free energy machine. The dead man was the only one
who really understood how the technology worked. I've heard this
scenario
On Dec 6, 2007, at 3:51 AM, thomas malloy wrote:
Vortexians:
Sterling Allen is reporting on the death of yet another energy
machine researcher. It has all the characters. Dr? Tom Bearden, a
heart disrupter weapon, a free energy machine. The dead man was the
only one who really
Hi,
http://www.physorg.com/news97945163.html
quote:-
This happens because the metamaterial that makes up the cloak stretches the
metrics of space, in a similar way to what heavy planets and stars do for the
metrics of space-time in Einsteins general relativity theory.
...sounds like a warp
75 matches
Mail list logo
