There are claims (from multiple unrelated sources) of matter which 'stops
existing' and yet the energy from that is not what you might assume. (not
explosive in the least)
Not to say that a matter antimatter reaction would not be as powerful as
imagined, but I don't think that conventional science
My definition of a nuclear reaction states that if transmutation is found
then it must be nuclear.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:28 AM, John Berry wrote:
> What if it works and the energy source isn't Nuclear?
>
> Or possibly that it in Nuclear but it is an entirely different to what we
> know?
>
>
What if it works and the energy source isn't Nuclear?
Or possibly that it in Nuclear but it is an entirely different to what we
know?
IMO that it is anomalous and makes no sense makes it more likely to be real.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> The multi-H reaction could be
The multi-H reaction could be producing vast amounts of nickel because of
its magic number. But no one can really tell how much nickel participates
in the reaction including Rossi.
Regards.
Axil
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:53 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 1
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 18:49:11 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I believe that the Ni-H theory that Rossi advertizes is invalid and I hold
>that fusion of multi H is occurring.
There is no reason why this would result in Copper, but it would make sense for
it to result in Nickel,
I believe that the Ni-H theory that Rossi advertizes is invalid and I hold
that fusion of multi H is occurring.
The same reaction that produces transmutation in the pure carbon/water
experiment is at work in the Rossi reaction.
This involves activation of H- ions and clustering under the infl
Thanks, Kyle.
I didn't check your math, but I bet it's correct. It fits with the
general picture. (And the conclusion is pretty funny, really...)
I still want to know how come we haven't seen a sample of anything from
Rossi which didn't show natural isotope ratios. Rossi's claimed to
hav
wrote:
> I have already communicated with Rossi on this matter, and he admits there
> is a
> "typo" in the patent application.
>
Imagine making a typo in a patent application! What an amateur thing to do.
Disgraceful.
- Jed
In reply to Kyle Mcallister's message of Mon, 9 May 2011 16:09:30 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>That's not fission level energy, or even fusion level energy. That's talking
>within the order of magnitude of converting rest mass directly into energy.
>
>Assuming by ton of oil he means 'tonne of oil equ
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Mon, May 9, 2011 9:31:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:This may be the entire patent
>
> V,
>
> Double checked my math after thinking about it. Unless I am missing
> something,
>that is the way it is.
>
> No one has anything to say on th
V,
Double checked my math after thinking about it. Unless I am missing something,
that is the way it is.
No one has anything to say on this?
You can't even get this kind of energy by fusing up the chain all the way from
hydrogen to nickel-56 as happens in massive stars, as far as I know, thoug
--- On Mon, 5/9/11, Terry Blanton wrote:
> He then claims that 58 g of Ni provides the equivalent
> energy of
> 30,000 tons of oil with the strangest calculation that
> begins with 10
> MeV of energy per reaction. This is converted to mass
> equivalent,
> multiplied by Avogadro's number and, usi
The Rossi US patent application is quite a piece of work. He claims
both fusion and fission reactions occur in the cell:
[0069] In particular, said graphs clearly show that zinc is
formed, whereas zinc was not present in the nickel powder
originally loaded into the apparatus said zinc being actua
I ocr'ed and uploaded the 2010 Piantelli patent as well:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/PiantelliSmethodforp.pdf
I do not know why these things are not ocr'ed at the WIPO website.
- Jed
I OCR'ed and uploaded the U.S. patent application. It might be a little
different. It is hard to compare. It is dated January 2011:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodandaa.pdf
If this is what the Italian P.O. approved, it isn't very helpful.
- Jed
Here is a link from the NyTeknik article:
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?FT=D&date=20110113&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=US&NR=2011005506A1&KC=A1
This is the U.S. application. My guess is that this is the whole thing. I
suppose that if it has been revised, the rev
16 matches
Mail list logo
