The meson data is consistent with the predictions made using SR,
and so
can be viewed as supporting it. Other interpretations are certainly
possible, however, and this experiment, alone, certainly doesn't
*prove*that time dilation occurs; to claim so is to step way
outside the bounds
of
Alexander Hollins wrote:
The meson data is consistent with the predictions made using SR,
and so
can be viewed as supporting it. Other interpretations are certainly
possible, however, and this experiment, alone, certainly doesn't
*prove*that time dilation occurs; to claim so is to step way
They ran it with an sr71 and a ground based clock. I can find no
evidence for this online, so we have to go by what my father (a
marine at the base the experiment was ran from) told me he was told by
his friend, who, while not the pilot for that experiment, was a pilot
for other experiments run
Alexander Hollins wrote:
They ran it with an sr71 and a ground based clock. I can find no
evidence for this online, so we have to go by what my father (a
marine at the base the experiment was ran from) told me he was told by
his friend, who, while not the pilot for that experiment, was a
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote:
AFAIK the experiment using atomic clocks on airplanes has been done
just once, and used clocks flown on commercial airliners for two single
trips around the world, going in opposite directions.
Oh, it's happening every
I wish I could. all i have is stories my father told me when i was a
kid. I also no longer have the pic of myself as a baby in 81 sitting
in the cockpit of one of the pre-production apaches... Sigh.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote:
Alexander Hollins
So...
I think i followed all the math on that, very simple math, thank you!
and, my original didnt start with lights being turned on with the ship
passing the station, but that DOES simplify things. thanks!
So... What your saying is that if you take into account time dilation,
the light DOES
leaking pen wrote:
So...
I think i followed all the math on that, very simple math, thank you!
and, my original didnt start with lights being turned on with the ship
passing the station, but that DOES simplify things. thanks!
So... What your saying is that if you take into account
So, its not velocity that causes time dillation, thats simply a
convenient way of reffering to it.
Its the difference in actual space traveled during the interval
compared to going in a geodesic, or straight line?
which, honestly, is a sum of the velocities of the trip of the non
geodesic
I have a paper out on Special Ralativity.? It covers velocity related time
dialation.
It was formulated from the observables see in cold fusion experiments
http://www.wbabin.net/science/znidarsic.pdf
enjoy
Frank Z
I also want to thank you Stephen for your detailed reply to leaking pen. I do
want to understand all of this as well, but it will take me a while to digest!
You can view it that way, but it's a little hazardous, because time
dilation isn't really just a simple number.
So is time dilation a
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Michael Crosiarcrosia...@yahoo.com wrote:
I also want to thank you Stephen for your detailed reply to leaking pen. I
do want to understand all of this as well, but it will take me a while to
digest!
You can view it that way, but it's a little hazardous, because
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
... time dilation isn't really just a simple number.
Hi All, 6-8-09
Here are some thoughts on time dilation.
Jack Smith
---
Quoting from Relational Mechanics by Andre K. T. Assis, 1999
(This book can be purchased at Amazon.com.)
p. 132
It is
Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
... time dilation isn't really just a simple number.
Hi All, 6-8-09
Here are some thoughts on time dilation.
Jack Smith
...
It is usually stated that this dilation of the proper
time of a body in motion has been proven by
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
In the case of the HK experiment, there's so little doubt as to the
result which would obtain with a correctly done experiment that nobody's
bothered to try to replicate it, AFAIK. (Note that if physics
researchers in general were in much doubt about the results
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
In the case of the HK experiment, there's so little doubt as to the
result which would obtain with a correctly done experiment that nobody's
bothered to try to replicate it, AFAIK. (Note that if physics
researchers in general were
Thanks for posting that.
I forwarded the Assis quote to another group.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Taylor J. Smith tj...@centurytel.net
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 5:05 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Time Dilation and relativity. Was Relativistic magnetic
fields and time
Stephen A. Lawrence
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Time Dilation and relativity. Was Relativistic
magnetic fields and time
Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
... time dilation isn't really just
18 matches
Mail list logo
