Harry Veeder wrote:
The most common approach to the problem was to postulate an aether which
carried the EM waves, and then try to patch things up so that Maxwell's
equations would still work. This approach had the large advantage that
it did *not* require reforming the common view of
on 14/9/08 8:25 am, Stephen A. Lawrence at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
The most common approach to the problem was to postulate an aether which
carried the EM waves, and then try to patch things up so that Maxwell's
equations would still work. This approach had the
Harry Veeder wrote:
on 14/9/08 8:25 am, Stephen A. Lawrence at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
The most common approach to the problem was to postulate an aether which
carried the EM waves, and then try to patch things up so that Maxwell's
equations would still work. This
on 14/9/08 4:19 pm, Stephen A. Lawrence at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
on 14/9/08 8:25 am, Stephen A. Lawrence at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
The most common approach to the problem was to postulate an aether which
carried the EM waves, and then
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v454/n7206/abs/nature07121.html
It's dawning on the mainstream gradually.
This is what I meant by fundamental science (and useful, truthful science)
being done on a shoestring on a bench top.
on 6/9/08 10:16 pm, Stephen A. Lawrence at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a frame of reference
movingat C the traveling wave no longer looks like a solution to
Maxwell'sequations, because @E/@t
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:29:00 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
They (apparently) oscillate, which, at least according to my limited and
rather primitive understanding of relativity theory, means time passes
for them, which suggests
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:12:25 -0400:
Hi,
Thanks, that helped. However it raises another question. What about circularly
polarized radiation?
[snip]
This makes me wonder how an ordinary photon manages to go through umpteen
cycles
between source and
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:45:47 +1000:
Hi,
Don't bother answering this, I get it.
[snip]
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:12:25 -0400:
Hi,
Thanks, that helped. However it raises another question. What about circularly
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:12:25 -0400:
Hi,
Thanks, that helped. However it raises another question. What about circularly
polarized radiation?
Well ... Looking at it classically, the same description applies to
circular
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008 8:12 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:gravity = pdf
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Fri, 05 Sep 2008
17:29:00 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
They (apparently
Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a frame of reference
movingat C the traveling wave no longer looks like a solution to
Maxwell'sequations, because @E/@t = @B/@t = 0. The way out of this
box chosen in
special relativity
On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:45 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
From the report:
How can black holes have gravity when nothing can get out because
escape speed is greater than the speed of light?
Always wondered about that conundrum.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 4 Sep 2008 22:12:01 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
I posted a message, then went shopping. I just got back, and discovered this
post from Horace. :)
[snip]
Given that graviphotons carry no charge, and have a very weak
coupling to electrostatic charge, i.e. to
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:05:13 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
First, let me be very clear that I said neutrinos may be comprised of
graviphotons, not gravitons the messenger particles.
[snip]
...and that's exactly what I meant. Is it possible that neutrinos and
graviphotons
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:05:13 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
First, let me be very clear that I said neutrinos may be comprised of
graviphotons, not gravitons the messenger particles.
[snip]
...and that's exactly what I meant. Is it
On Sep 5, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:05:13
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
First, let me be very clear that I said neutrinos may be comprised of
graviphotons, not gravitons the messenger particles.
[snip]
...and that's exactly
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:29:00 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
They (apparently) oscillate, which, at least according to my limited and
rather primitive understanding of relativity theory, means time passes
for them, which suggests pretty strongly that their speed must
For those who haven't seen it:
The Speed of Gravity What the Experiments Say
Tom Van Flandern, Meta Research
[as published in Physics Letters A 250:1-11 (1998)]
http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp
hint: this is not a pdf file but gavity is pdf (pretty damn fast)
Jonse sez:
For those who haven't seen it:
The Speed of Gravity What the Experiments Say
Tom Van Flandern, Meta Research
[as published in Physics Letters A 250:1-11 (1998)]
http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp
hint: this is not a pdf file but gavity is pdf (pretty damn
.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:gravity = pdf
OrionWorks wrote
How can black holes have gravity when nothing can get out because
escape speed is greater than
OrionWorks wrote
How can black holes have gravity when nothing can get out because
escape speed is greater than the speed of light?
Simple my dear Watson, the influence of gravity itself IS superluminal
(according to some)
OrionWorks wrote:
Jonse sez:
For those who haven't seen it:
The Speed of Gravity What the Experiments Say
Tom Van Flandern, Meta Research
[as published in Physics Letters A 250:1-11 (1998)]
http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp
hint: this is not a pdf file but
- Original Message -
From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008 8:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:gravity = pdf
Jonse sez:
For those who haven't seen it:
The Speed of Gravity What the Experiments Say
Tom Van Flandern, Meta Research
[as published
24 matches
Mail list logo
