Terry Blanton wrote:
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He does not get an 'A'.
Randell doesn't get an A, what does that mean? The questions are: does
his reactor produce the amount of energy that he says it does, and can
his processes produce novel, and useful materials. If the answer to
slaps head
Terry
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:20 AM, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He does not get an 'A'.
Randell doesn't get an A, what does that mean? The questions are: does his
reactor produce the amount of energy
- Original Message -
From: thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:responce to the IPKat - weblog
Terry Blanton wrote:
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He does not get an 'A'.
Randell doesn't get an A, what
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:40:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
What is missing from Mills' publications, and apparaently the scientific
literature as well, is data on the effective range of the resonant transfer
effect, or the 'cross section'.
[snip]
My bet is that actual
Tomis,
It's 'RandEll' not 'RandAll'.
sigh
T
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slaps head
Terry
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:20 AM, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:responce to the IPKat - weblog
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:40:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
What is missing from
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:52:51 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Peter Zimmerman advanced the 'contact' agument on another forum some time
ago. The radii of a H atom and typical catalyst, such as Ar+, are so small
that if contact were required, the probability of reaction would
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
The probability of reaction is quite small, in fact Ar+ is not a very good
catalyst. Nevertheless, contacts happen all the time, otherwise gas pressure
wouldn't exist.
MC: Gas pressure results for impacts with the
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:26:06 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The probability of reaction is quite small, in fact Ar+ is not a very good
catalyst. Nevertheless, contacts happen all the time, otherwise gas pressure
wouldn't exist.
MC: Gas pressure results for impacts with the
Thomis,
It's 'Randell Mills'. He does not get an 'A'.
Teri
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:38 PM, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Carrell wrote:
A standard tactic of patent examiners is deny and cite objections and
force the applicant to overcome the objections. Objections of this
Mike Carrell wrote:
A standard tactic of patent examiners is deny and cite objections and
force the applicant to overcome the objections. Objections of this
type have been seen before. The process of overcoming them is
iterative, lengthy, expensive, and private. It is reasonable to
believe
11 matches
Mail list logo
