Mike Carrell wrote:
A standard tactic of patent examiners is deny and cite objections and
force the applicant to overcome the objections. Objections of this
type have been seen before. The process of overcoming them is
iterative, lengthy, expensive, and private. It is reasonable to
believe that such interaction is ongoing and necessary to protect
investors and prospective partners. Legal action may follow, which
would make interesting theater.
Dear Kat;
I post on Vortex-L, scientific anomalies. One of the Vortexians posted
the URL of your comments on Randall Mills of Black Light Power. In one
of the papers on the BLP website, Randall claims that he can produce
energy from a BLP reactor, 1 KW / 2 cubic feet of reactor. He also
claims to have produced various novel materials. His investors have
clearly invested tens of millions of dollars in his research, and either
he can do what he says he can do, or he can't. If he can do, then
science is just going to have to adjust.
Your poking fun at Randall is a continuation of the attacks which have
been made against researchers in a number of areas. What they have in
common is questioning the established paradigms. In 1909 Scientific
American published an article questioning the feasibility of heavier
than air machine flight. Some of the dumbest people I've ever met have
graduate degrees. In particular law degrees, two of them want to be the
next president.
--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
