David Thomson wrote:
> Hi Harry,
>
>> These days I am more concerned with Big Sister than Big Brother.
>
> Why is that?
>
> Dave
>
Big Sister is hard at work making the sexes equal.
Harry
Hi Harry,
> These days I am more concerned with Big Sister than Big Brother.
Why is that?
Dave
These days I am more concerned with Big Sister than Big Brother.
Harry
Howdy Vorts,
Used to be plenty of snooping on the Dime Box Texas telephone system back
when we used hand crank up auto-dialing features. Every snoop in town would
lift up their phone and listen in to the most intimate conversations and
latest gossip.
Can you imagine the size of the building
Hi Paul,
> Any thoughts on Linux or Mac?
The government's business is to know what its citizens are doing. You
realize there are computer science divisions of the NSA and CIA, right? Do
you really think they are sitting back and letting new technology defeat
them?
I only know a tiny bit about
David Thomson wrote:
[snip]
> Does it really surprise you that NSA is involved in VISTA?
> They have been involved from the beginning since
> Windows 95, only now they are getting an upgrade and you are paying
> for it. How else are they going to pay for these black projects?
I've always wonder
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Well, well!
The old phone systems. disconnected the transmitter (carbon mouth piece)
element from the phone line, by direct open contact. If you dispute this get
an old phone and check it out. In the older systems it was not possible
without modification.
I do not d
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:51 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Is Big brother watching?
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
>1) Prior to ESS phone systems, the old relay banks did not work well for
>covert monitoring. It did require intervention from the phone company that
>
Hi Jed,
>>Remember back in the sixties when it was a felony to open your
>>telephone and modify it?
> That is preposterous. The 1933 FCC rules forbade attachment to the
telephone network of any device "not furnished by the telephone
company." They said nothing about opening up telephones. Mill
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
1) Prior to ESS phone systems, the old relay banks did not work well for
covert monitoring. It did require intervention from the phone company that
controlled the switches. It was possible to bridge a line and have it
monitored via another line, yet the best method was
sage-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Is Big brother watching?
On 3/8/07, David Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Future phones will be directly tracked by
> GPS.
You're living
Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:03 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Is Big brother watching?
I wrote:
>Millions of people opened up telephones in the 1960s, including me.
I might add that my father was something of an expert at spotting
On 3/8/07, David Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Future phones will be directly tracked by
GPS.
You're living in the past. :-) Most phones have had GPS chips since
2004. No one triangulates any more. It was a requirement of the
Enhanced 911 service.
Allegedly, I can turn this feature o
I wrote:
Millions of people opened up telephones in the 1960s, including me.
I might add that my father was something of an expert at spotting and
disconnecting 1940s era listening devices, because he traveled around
Russia during WWII on U.S. Embassy business. The only way to get room
serv
David Thomson wrote:
Remember back in the sixties when it was a felony to open your
telephone and modify it?
That is preposterous. The 1933 FCC rules forbade attachment to the
telephone network of any device "not furnished by the telephone
company." They said nothing about opening up telepho
y now they are getting an upgrade and you are paying
for it. How else are they going to pay for these black projects?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lowrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 12:19 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Is Big brother
People are talking about NSA working with Microsoft.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/browse_frm/thread/59ceb37bb8bf6ea0/63b615317e57df5b?#63b615317e57df5b
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Subject: RE: Is Big Brother watching?
Microsoft's Longhorn has spyware plan
Black box is Vole's 007
By Nick Farrell: Wednesday 27 April 2005, 07:05
PERVASIVE SOFTWARE giant Microsoft says that it is planning to install
spyware into the next version of Windows to help it work o
you mean like longhorn?
On 6/23/05, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I posted;
>
> >At 10:32 pm 22/06/2005 -0500, you wrote:
> >>An E E took his new computer apart and found a chip which appears to
> >>been placed in the circuitry by Home Land Security.
> >
> > >http://www.chiark.gree
I posted;
At 10:32 pm 22/06/2005 -0500, you wrote:
An E E took his new computer apart and found a chip which appears to
been placed in the circuitry by Home Land Security.
>http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~jdamery/archive/www.roflcaeks.biz/lol.html
And Grimer replied;
No he is not. The
At 10:32 pm 22/06/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>An E E took his new computer apart and found a chip which appears to
>been placed in the circuitry by Home Land Security.
>http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~jdamery/archive/www.roflcaeks.biz/lol.html
No he is not. The clue is in the end of the URL (
actually, thats faked. the pic was put together, and the letter was
pulled from a political website. i mean, look at the bloody web
address. lol.html. it was a prank, if you search elsewhere on the
site, they talk about it.
On 6/22/05, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An E E took his
An E E took his new computer apart and found a chip which appears to
been placed in the circuitry by Home Land Security.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~jdamery/archive/www.roflcaeks.biz/lol.html
23 matches
Mail list logo
