BlankNow that this thread has led into ancient technology in general, let me
stir the pot by referring to Cremo Thompson's Hidden History of the Human
Race, a condensation of Forbidden Archeology. Their invesigation pushes
evidence of intelligent hominid habitation way, way back in time. It's
theres no egg here to wipe. and no, theres not really much
difference. they mean the same thing. and yes, darwin was a
scientist. if youve read his works, youd know that. he formulated
theory, made observations, changed his theory based on observations.
he allowed his religion to color his
something ive refused to believe (that we are smarter) since
discovering just how many things have been known for centuries or more
that influence and shape modern technology. i agree completely, we
arent smarter, we just have more tools to work with. however, one
thing that IS different between
thomas malloy wrote:
Baronvolsung wrote:
The movie Highlander 2, The Quickening starring Christopher Lambert,
has a
Really Baron, this is a science discussion group.
In case anyone else hasn't noticed B.V. is a sci fi writer (amateur? not
sure) who normally posts sci-fi to the list. Check out
RC Macaulay wrote:
Back to Egyptian pyramids.. The scope of teh work and technology
required leaves me wondering how much of ancient history is missing..
we actually know or understand so little. Take the library of
Alexandria in Egypt that was sacked and burned in later BC. The Greeks
Mike- I would guess what the Egyptians did not have is
an abundance of wood to make forms.-Ges-
On 4/25/05, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith Nagel wrote:
Mike writes:
We moderns suffer from temporal chauvisism, the delusion that we are the
smartest of all humanity [which is refuted by any teenager]. It happens that
there are more tech geeks like us than
In a message dated 4/24/05 12:41:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really Baron, this is a science discussion group. By that logic, you
should mention the thermonuclear fusion reactors that powered Star
ship Enterprise.
I am using the principles of reverse engineering of
In a message dated 4/24/05 8:08:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Egyptians scoffed at Grecian works and architecture explaining they ( Egypt) has a history eons before Greece existed.
http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/Treasury_of_Atreus.html
Richard
The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Mike- I would guess what the Egyptians did not have is
an abundance of wood to make forms.-Ges-
At one time Egypt was forested, but I'm not sure when. Wood for forms is a
non-issue, they were re-used over and over. The wet concrete was like wet
Baronvolsung wrote:
The movie Highlander 2, The Quickening starring Christopher Lambert, has a
Really Baron, this is a science discussion group. By that logic, you
should mention the thermonuclear fusion reactors that powered Star
ship Enterprise.
And Mike Carrol responded;
MC: That is a work
Tom wrote:
snip
I listened to an interview in which the interviewee said that the
machining on the granite box's inner corners was too precise to have
been done even by modern machine tools.
The coffer in the King's Chamber, and others, show a precision of
manufacture in granite that defies
Seems antiquity is loaded with examples of engineering and architectural
works that have us thinking that perhaps the people of that age were intelligent
beings and had not degenerated which seems to contradict the Darwinian
theorists.
Jones.. look at the ceiling construction.
Back to
how... does that refute darwinian theory? at the point that humans
took control of the environment, we no longer had to adapt as much to
survive, therefore one WOULDNT assume that we are simply more
intelligent than previous humans, we simply know more.
take your personal biases OUT of a
Leaking pen wrote..
how... does that refute darwinian theory? at the point that
humanstook control of the environment, we no longer had to adapt as much
tosurvive, therefore one WOULDNT assume that we are simply
moreintelligent than previous humans, we simply know
more.take your personal
RC writes:
Seems antiquity is loaded with examples of engineering and
architectural works that have us thinking that perhaps the
people of that age were intelligent beings and had not
degenerated which seems to contradict the Darwinian theorists.
I was taught to skin and tan a deer hide at the
that was directed at satellites in the sky very likely to create a force field around the Earth much like the pyramid water pump in the Highlander movie above. The pyramids in Egypt were built about 20,000 years ago according to carbon dating, so that they were built by Atlantis. The Giza pyramid power plant
the Giza Power
Plant by Christopher Dunn proves that the Giza pyramid in Egypt was used to
create energy from water and hydrogen to generate an energy beam that was
directed at satellites in the sky very likely to create a force field around
the Earth much like the pyramid water pump
pyramid in Egypt was used to create energy from water and hydrogen to
generate an energy beam that was directed at satellites in the sky very
likely to create a force field around the Earth much like the pyramid water
pump in the Highlander movie above.
MC: I have read Dunn's book and corresponded
the pyramid water
pump in the Highlander movie above.
MC: I have read Dunn's book and corresponded with him. He is an industrial
machinist who makes a few good points that many ancient Egytptian artifacts
could not have been fabricated by subtractive (cutting away) technologies
using
At 9:42 AM 4/14/5, Mike Carrell wrote:
Research by a Distinguished Professor in material science has shown that
samples of rock from the Giza plateau are indeed synthetic. His paper is
being submitted to a senior scientific publication.
I thought this was determined some years ago. I recall
Horace wrote:
At 9:42 AM 4/14/5, Mike Carrell wrote:
Research by a Distinguished Professor in material science has shown that
samples of rock from the Giza plateau are indeed synthetic. His paper is
being submitted to a senior scientific publication.
I thought this was determined some
leaking pen wrote:
I was just sent this by a friend. anyone seen it before?
http://www.thepump.org/art3subcuttings.html
it seems plausible, yet im immediately thinking there is an ou issue
here. its essentially pumping water from the surface and back, yes
no? with no extra source of energy.
I was just sent this by a friend. anyone seen it before?
http://www.thepump.org/art3subcuttings.html
it seems plausible, yet im immediately thinking there is an ou issue
here. its essentially pumping water from the surface and back, yes
no? with no extra source of energy.
24 matches
Mail list logo
