Obviously a lot of effort went into this. I am curious, where did the
information about the 1 bar pressure regulator in the outlet come from? How
does that talley with the 124°C temperature that was recorded at 15:58,
given that 124°C implies a pressure (saturated steam) of 2.25bar absoulute
(1.2
At 01:03 PM 10/13/2011, Robert Lynn wrote:
Obviously a lot of effort went into this. I am
curious, where did the information about the 1
bar pressure regulator in the outlet come
from? How does that talley with the 124°C
temperature that was recorded at 15:58, given
that 124°C implies a pre
Mr. Higgins did a fantastic diagram of the fat-cat...
-mark
e on one side... I do not think
that is accurate.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Mr. Higgins did a fantastic diagram of the fat-cat...
-mark
: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
However, I'm not sure if he's got the dimensions of the heat spreaders
correct.
>From all the pics of the fat-cat open, the heat spreader fins look to
have a
uniform ~3cm clearance from the 4 walls. In Higgins' drawing,
At 01:19 PM 10/13/2011, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Mr. Higgins did a fantastic diagram of the fat-cat...
He offered me a higher-res version, if anyone wants it.
At 01:32 PM 10/13/2011, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
The drawing I included is only meant to be a diagrammatic/schematic
representation to help understand the quantities being considered.
Welcome to vortex
al Message-
From: Higgins Bob-CBH003 [mailto:bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:32 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
The drawing I included is only meant to be a diagrammatic/schematic
representation to help understand the qua
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
wrote:
> Hi Bob,
> I think all us Vorts appreciate the time you've put into the analyses and
> diagrams...
Yes! Welcome to Vortex, Bob.
I'm curious. At one time it was rumored that Motorola was interested
in the CETI cold fusion power cel
lto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 4:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Hi Bob,
I think all us Vorts appreciate the time you've put into the analyses
and
diagrams...
I know you say the diagram is only meant to help visualize things, but
from
M
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
wrote:
> Hi Bob,
> I think all us Vorts appreciate the time you've put into the analyses
and
> diagrams...
Yes! Welcome to Vortex, Bob.
I'm curious.
At 03:26 PM 10/13/2011, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
Hi Mark,
I will consider such a drawing. However, the present diagram is not
geometrically correct - the internal unit is rotated in the
cross-section so as to highlight the fins. What is needed is a proper
drawing from the pictures. I just do
mailto:bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 3:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Hi Mark,
I will consider such a drawing. However, the present diagram is not
geometrically correct - the internal unit is rotated in the
cross-section so as t
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Higgins Bob-CBH003
wrote:
> At this point, I can only say that my involvement is personal. I was
> around in those Patterson days and was part of a panel that considered
> Motorola's involvement. Unfortunately, I am one of the few from that
> group that is still
.@well.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 7:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
At 03:26 PM 10/13/2011, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
>Hi Mark,
>
>I will consider such a drawing. However, the present diagram is not
>geometrically correct - the internal
A belated welcome to Bob Higgins and all the other newcomers brought
here by the Rossi extravaganza.
On Oct 13, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Hi Bob,
Having some basic dimensioning (height, width, length, etc.) would
have been
helpful for many of the analyses done to dat
At 05:58 PM 10/13/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
It does not appear there are any fins on the bottom of the reactor
housing.
My confidential observer said that there ARE fins on the bottom.
I pleaded with him to get photos of everything WITH a ruler but
here we are again pixel-peeping!
An
On Oct 13, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
I think the "resistor network" and finite element approaches discussed
below are a great track for understanding the possible magnitude of
the
Tout error. The big uncertainty is the pipe thread. It may take
experiments to estimate the
On Oct 13, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 05:58 PM 10/13/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
It does not appear there are any fins on the bottom of the reactor
housing.
My confidential observer said that there ARE fins on the bottom.
I pleaded with him to get photos of everything WITH
ace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Mark,
I am working on getting better or confirming estimates. I am also
working on multiple other things at the moment so please be patient.
[snip]
r to be inconsistent with Rossie’s statement. It is of
course important to obtain accurate measurements of these values to
make consistent sense of the data.
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:59 PM
Subject:
values to make consistent sense of the data.
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Mark,
I am working on getting better or confirming estimates. I am also
working on
22 matches
Mail list logo
