Well, the professor should be questioned, if not chided - about what is not
seen and not reported, instead of what is seen and glossed over. This is
substandard, at best.
It is an interesting experiment BUT it is one that looks more like the Rossi
effect than Mills.
Heat is added to
Well, Jones, to be fair to Dr Glumac, I do not see where he is verbalizing
support for Mills' theoretical underpinnings. Scientific progress is based
on having the funds and initiative to move forward. It is not surprising
that as a contractee to Mills, Glumac was not asked to check for photon
It would have been interesting to see a assay of the elements present in
the sample before an after the experiment. This is a means to find out if
any transmutation resulted from the experiment. Did the gas pressure inside
the test cell increase? Was helium produced?
It would be interesting to
Perhaps the initial response was too harsh … as this could be important – but
Mills has a long history of trying to “buy” academic support for his theory, in
various subtle ways like this – with the result being that at least one
Professor was fired for not disclosing the personal contacts and
FWIW if you take a look at Dr Glumac's faculty directory page he does list
himself as a consultant for Blacklight Power. That seems to be an
out-in-the-open disclosure of contact. This guy might turn out to be a
valuable ally, would be interesting to hear from him.
Steve High
On Sun, May 25,
http://mechanical.illinois.edu/directory/faculty/glumac
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Carl High diamondweb...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW if you take a look at Dr Glumac's faculty directory page he does list
himself as a consultant for Blacklight Power. That seems to be an
out-in-the-open
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Was helium produced?
I do not think you could detect this, even with the best mass spectrometer
and a tightly sealed cell. Helium is ubiquitous and after strenuous efforts
to remove it, the background would probably be far higher than the amount
produced in
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I do not think you could detect this, even with the best mass spectrometer
and a tightly sealed cell. Helium is ubiquitous and after strenuous efforts
to remove it, the background would probably be far higher than the
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious -- are your comments in the context of detecting helium in an
NiH experiment, or in general?
Ni-H may not even produce helium. I wouldn't know. I meant any nuclear
reaction that produces helium. The amount is tens of millions of times
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Anomalous heat production validated by a Young Dude
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious -- are your comments in the context of detecting
The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics - enough said. I don't know
which is more irritating, that mainstream people ignore the transparent reports
of telescopes and thermometers, or that self-serving narcissists invent their
own worlds and push them on those who have lost their
Soa presumably capable researcher puts hydroxy nickel in a sealed crucible,
matches it with an equal mass of indium, heats the crucibles to 300 degrees and
measures an elevated heat signature from the active crucible. This result is
invalidated because there are no hydrinos? I would prefer
12 matches
Mail list logo
