In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 9 Dec 2011 02:27:21 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Several neutron Compton scattering (NCS) experiments on liquid and solid
samples containing protons or deuterons show a striking anomaly, namely, a
shortfall in the intensity of energetic neutrons scattered by the
Reference:
http://neutrons.ornl.gov/workshops/ian2006/eV/eV_IAN2006oct_Dreismann.pdf
The Scattering cross section ratio σH/σD should not be affected by angle of
the particle collision or the percentage of hydrogen saturation, but it is
and by as much as 50%.
This indicates that hydrogen bonds
Axil:
Thanks for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio!
It’s been going up steadily for the last two days, thanks to the ‘ol-timers…
-Mark
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 9:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Attenuation of decay
Axil:
Let me take a stab at your question:
Why should coherent protons be any better at thermalizing gamma radiation
than ordinary protons? (Especially if that coherence is limited to pairs).
The coherent photons are acting as a resonant antenna. I'm sure many have
played around with
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Thu, 8 Dec 2011 02:44:29 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Axil:
Let me take a stab at your question:
It wasn't Axil's question, it was mine.
Why should coherent protons be any better at thermalizing gamma radiation
than ordinary protons? (Especially if that
Hi Robin,
Sorry, guess I was focusing on the question, not the questioner!! :-)
Let me deal with the second question first, and I'll follow up tomorrow on
Q1.
Robin's second question:
2) If such ensembles are fleeting, then one might expect at least some gamma
rays to escape, yet few to none
*Attosecond Protonic Quantum Entanglement in Collision Experiments with
Neutrons and Electrons***
http://www.maik.ru/full/lasphys/05/6/lasphys6_05p780full.pdf
Several neutron Compton scattering (NCS) experiments on liquid and solid
samples containing protons or deuterons show a striking anomaly,
Jones Beene wrote:
We have to agree with the comments . . .
Who's we? You? As Mark Twain put it: Only kings, presidents, editors,
and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial 'we.'
that the prior testing clearly indicates
that there is no significant radioactivity
I speculate…
When a compound or transition metal has a high degree of quantum
mechanical(QM) proton coherence; large numbers of cooper pairs of protons,
radiation reduction will be observed when this coherence is momentarily
broken by a trigger event.
In a variant of the quantum Zeno effect in
The ONLY way that nuclear transactions can proceed smoothly with out producing
radiation is under a condition where the range of the strong nuclear force
exceeds the range of the coulombic.
The static forces are conserved and immutable. The dynamic magnetic
components are not conserved
If you remember this from the Kim paper:
*http://www.physics.purdue.edu/people/faculty/yekim/BECNF-Ni-Hydrogen.pdf*
...local magnetic field is very weak in the surface regions, providing a
suitable environment in which two neighboring protons can couple their
spins anti-parallel to form
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:21:38 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
In this low temperature lattice case, coulomb shielding from the ultra
strong dipole moments of Rydberg matter produced by the internal heater
will still occur and cold fusion will still result in a cold lattice. But
in
Hi…
Why should coherent protons be any better at thermalizing gamma radiation
than
ordinary protons? (Especially if that coherence is limited to pairs).
I am reading this paper to try and figure out what is taking about.
Adiabatic entanglement transport in Rydberg aggregates
Hi…corrected spelling
Why should coherent protons be any better at thermalizing gamma radiation
than ordinary protons? (Especially if that coherence is limited to pairs).
I am reading this paper to try and figure out what is talking about.
Adiabatic entanglement transport in Rydberg
14 matches
Mail list logo
