Jed, Jones and others--
I too read the Craven’s report and found it very interesting--particularly his
discussion of the theory.
He points out the importance of the magnetic field aligning the D nuclei in
antiparallel spin orientations as well as the importance of vacancies in the
Pd
From: Bob Cook
Is there any reason why the D nuclei could not form excited states of high but
opposite spin states which collapse quickly to the zero spin He with
distribution of small spin quanta to other entities in the lattice including
spin angular momentum associated with orbital
http://www2.ju.edu.jo/sites/Academic/humamg/Lists/Published%20Research/Attachments/43/T-matrix_and_effective_scattering_in_spin-polarized_atomic_deuterium.pdf
Since the spin of deuterium is non zero, I claim that Deuterium cannot
support LENR unless it is in its cooper pair like dimer form. This
Jones--
Helium or something like He with Atomic Wt 4 is seen as a relic in the Pd,D
reaction. The Dirac sea may be involved as we have discussed.
It remains that gammas from “normal” nuclear transitions is missing. Cravens
thinks the24 Mev transition happens . The Navy SPAWARS
From: Bob Cook
Helium or something like He with Atomic Wt 4 is seen as a
relic in the Pd,D reaction.
OK, we can buy that - but realize that the only way this works out in terms
of what is seen and what is not seen is if “something like He” with
5 matches
Mail list logo
