On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> It is interesting to think about in light of our recent measurement of
> high energy emissions from the Ni-H reaction. If the Ni-H reaction really
> does generate MeV class electrons, they could be useful in the reactor for
> transmutations.
You can get high electric fields at small scale, but that is not the same
as having a total electric potential of 500kV. In a vacuum, a 500kV
potential can generate 500keV electrons.
It is interesting to think about in light of our recent measurement of high
energy emissions from the Ni-H reactio
I wrote:
This one talks about transmuting thorium and radium ...
>
Sorry, that's thorium and uranium.
Eric
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Chris Zell wrote:
I believe the Barker patent suggested that you could transmute silver into
> rhodium if you could come up with a couple million volts (DC) for a number
> of hours.
Perhaps you're thinking of another patent by Barker. This one talks about
tran
Jones Beene wrote:
Santilli is seldom talked about because he has a decades old history of
> suing everyone who questions his work.
>
You don't even need to question his work. I had never heard of the guy and
he sent sent me a letter threatening to sue me! I think it was in
connection with his s
eb 2016 09:57:26 -0600
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
Has stimulated beta decay been considered here already?
I found this old but interesting patent application by Rugerro Santilli fro
Patent is still interesting though.
From: stephen_coo...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:07:09 +0100
The whole patent is interesting in my opinion.
But look at the graphs in Figure 6… look a little bi
accepted theory – which
means they must be rejected by the priests of physics.
From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 10:57 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen
e 7 looks quite interesting too ;)
>
> --
> From: eric.wal...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:57:26 -0600
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke
interesting too ;)
From: eric.wal...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:57:26 -0600
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
Has stimulated beta decay been considered here already? I found this old but
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
Has stimulated beta decay been considered here already?
I found this old but interesting patent application by Rugerro Santilli
> from 2003 on line.
> http://www.google.com/patents/US20030016774
> Is it already known here?
Interesting p
11 matches
Mail list logo
