At 01:37 PM 9/24/2009, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> http://www.nanosolar.com/power-plants/large-roofs
Beautiful!!
Sticking a sail on the roof never appealed to me. So in exchange for
some penalty in reduced power, they build you a system that's likely to
outlive the gales of November, whether
Michel Jullian wrote:
> 2009/9/17 Jed Rothwell :
>
>> He did not mention any of the problems with photovoltaic devices such as the
>> long energy payback time.
>
> Not any more Jed! It used to be a significant portion of the ~25
> years lifetime, but with new thin-film technologies it's only
2009/9/17 Jed Rothwell :
> He did not mention any of the problems with photovoltaic devices such as the
> long energy payback time.
Not any more Jed! It used to be a significant portion of the ~25
years lifetime, but with new thin-film technologies it's only months
now:
http://www.nanosolar.co
As I said, after the NSF/EPRI meeting and perhaps a few others, Lewis
should have said something like: "my initial concerns about this work
have now been satisfied, and I agree the effect is real." You are
supposed to be able to say that with no loss of face. It is pefectly
okay to have doubts
ention to.-The End-(for the moment)-JO-
> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:16:48 -0400
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
> From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:The two irritating Nates
>
> Jack O Suileabhain wrote:
>
> >Tom Friedman NYTimes: The
7; And Tom Friedman
is so finely tuned-subtle that he could balance a dime on the edge of a very
sharp knife. And I say this of Mr. Friedman out of a pure sense of admiration;
and maybe just a wee-bit of envy.-JO-
> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:16:48 -0400
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vo
Jack O Suileabhain wrote:
Tom Friedman NYTimes: The most telling element in this entire
extended discourse, is of course, Tom Friedman's sudden infatuation
with this subject.
That's wrong. Friedman has been promoting and writing about
alternative energy for many years, before it was fashion
t's always a pleasure to watch someone that is really a master of his
trade.
His job would be an extremely interesting one, and if I'd been fated with his
talent and positioning-opportunities I'd likely be enjoying myself immensely as
well; and as he appears to be doing also. B
Jed,
I could be wrong, but my guess is that Nate Lewis just doesn't have what it
takes to admit that he was frustrated and very emotional about the whole
damn thing and that he threw the baby out with the bathwater.
I approached Nate a few years ago in person but he turned his back on me
and
~?Why the 'Nate's' dodge?~
Answer: Find out who pulls the 'Nate's' strings and you'll know who's getting
extremely tangible/proactive results with the research. Once again the policy
of Red Herring aka disinformation try's to decoy &/or discourage proponents
such as yourself either total
10 matches
Mail list logo
