I sat next to Steve Jones at one of the ICCF18 sessions. He was carrying a cylinder with a couple of toggle switches at one end and a couple of multi-pin connectors at the other end. It looked vaguely like a sinctillator cell but longer. He wouldn't tell me what it was, just said "current work,
From: a...@magicsound.us
I sat next to Steve Jones at one of the ICCF18 sessions. He
was carrying a cylinder with a couple of toggle switches at one end and a
couple of multi-pin connectors at the other end. It looked vaguely like a
sinctillator
What's also strange about Steve Jones is that he has been at the center of
the 9-11 debate over thermite being used to bring down buildings. It
seems he's both status quo on cold fusion, but insanely anti-status quo on
9-11 Truth. Bizarre? Or am I crazy one? I draw no conclusions about any of
Of interest:
BRIEF HISTORY OF COLD FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Secondary title:
PIEZONUCLEAR FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
By BYU Professors Jae Ballif, William Evenson, and Steven Jones
Compiled in 1989
I. Scientific Team
II. History
Quote
I. Scientific Team
A.
Jones, interesting, what's your interpretation of this?
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*Of interest: *
*BRIEF HISTORY OF COLD FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Secondary title:
*
*PIEZONUCLEAR FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY *
*By BYU
From: Foks0904
Jones, interesting, what's your interpretation of this?
Steven is a talented researcher who is still at it, but not in LENR.
He posts on Harti’s forum from time to time.
He may have suffered more from the negative publicity surrounding PF then they
did. Too bad
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones, interesting, what's your interpretation of this?
Jeeze, 904, don't you get it: Steve Jones . . . Jones Beane . . .
Harry Tuttle . . . . must I spell it out?
That would be awesome.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones, interesting, what's your interpretation of this?
Jeeze, 904, don't you get it: Steve Jones . . . Jones Beane . . .
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be awesome.
Yea, well, just be careful and keep your 27b-6 in your jacket. Notice
that lately, Jones, alias Buttle or Tuttle, has done more to obfuscate
cold FUSION since Axis(Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman
Oh, and be on the watch for someone named Qohen Leth.
Drowning in technocracy? Is that the one leads to lunacracy?
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/19/movies/christoph-waltz-drowns-in-technocracy-in-the-zero-theorem.html?_r=0
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Oh, and be on the watch for someone named Qohen Leth.
This looks like it was an effort to establish priority over the discovery.
The matter of priority regarding cold fusion was a big concern in 1989 and
1990. It is interesting that what Steven Jones and what Pons and
Fleischmann believed they were seeing and reported in their measurements
were
I wrote:
Even if a scientist erroneously disavows discovering a specific phenomenon
like LENR, I suppose, this is not necessarily to say that history books
won't recognize whatever role he played later on.
Just to clarify -- the above is a hypothetical. Even if what Steven Jones
was seeing
13 matches
Mail list logo
