Re: [Vo]:Rossi: The 1 MW plant is for military purpose

2012-04-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Last year, Rossi insisted that he would never do business with the military. Now this! He is inconsistent, to say the least. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi: The 1 MW plant is for military purpose

2012-04-12 Thread Axil Axil
Rossi’s reactor is attractive to the US military because of its very high power density. The E-Cat catalyst (AKA secret sauce) reduces the size and weight of the LENR core by a factor of 100 over a non-catalyzed reactor. One gram of nickel in a E-Cat does the work of 100 grams in non-catalyzed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi: The 1 MW plant is for military purpose

2012-04-12 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 21:13 Donnerstag, 12.April 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Rossi: The 1 MW plant is for military purpose Last year, Rossi insisted that he would never do business with the military. Now

Re: [Vo]:Rossi: The 1 MW plant is for military purpose

2012-04-12 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Last year, Rossi insisted that he would never do business with the military. Is that what he said? I remember it differently. He was talking about selling licenses but not for military applications. The way I took it

Re: [Vo]:Rossi: The 1 MW plant is for military purpose

2012-04-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: The way I took it was that, he already had a relationship with the military and no military licenses were available. He told me he did not want the technology used by the military because he is a pacifist. I have no idea if that is how he truly felt.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi: The 1 MW plant is for military purpose

2012-04-12 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: He told me he did not want the technology used by the military because he is a pacifist. Capitalism trumps being a pacifist. :-) I have no idea if that is how he truly felt. Perhaps, as you suggest, it was actually

Re: [Vo]:Rossi: The 1 MW plant is for military purpose

2012-04-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: I seriously doubt any procurement officer would be involved in this transaction. I would think all this would occur at a much higher pay grade. Given the way he treated the people from NASA and others, you would have to be crazy to deal with him at