Re: [Vo]:Virtual Particles are Gravitational Dipoles

2011-11-30 Thread Horace Heffner
I wrote: "The use of the factor i in gravimagnetic terms eliminates the manual sign placing and permits a full isomorphism between the two sets of laws, an isomorphism the existence of which has been commonly sensed by physicists for over a century, but not to my knowledge ever fully develo

Re: [Vo]:Virtual Particles are Gravitational Dipoles

2011-11-30 Thread Horace Heffner
On Nov 29, 2011, at 8:48 PM, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote: On 29 Nov 2011, at 22:49, Horace Heffner wrote: In 2007 I converted Jemimenko's theory into a full isomorphism between the laws of electromagnetism and the laws of gravimagnetism. Creating this isomorphism involves the use of the i

Re: [Vo]:Virtual Particles are Gravitational Dipoles

2011-11-29 Thread Dr Josef Karthauser
On 29 Nov 2011, at 22:49, Horace Heffner wrote: > > In 2007 I converted Jemimenko's theory into a full isomorphism between the > laws of electromagnetism and the laws of gravimagnetism. Creating this > isomorphism involves the use of the imaginary number i in gravimagnetic > terms, and thus the

Re: [Vo]:Virtual Particles are Gravitational Dipoles

2011-11-29 Thread Horace Heffner
On Nov 29, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Jones Beene wrote: -Original Message- From: Horace Heffner NICE, Horace - thanks for explaining this once again in the context of an incorrect view (Hajdukovic). I finally understand where you are coming from. This is the best stuff to appear on Vortex

RE: [Vo]:Virtual Particles are Gravitational Dipoles

2011-11-29 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: Horace Heffner NICE, Horace - thanks for explaining this once again in the context of an incorrect view (Hajdukovic). I finally understand where you are coming from. This is the best stuff to appear on Vortex in months and makes me glad I did not sign off when the

Re: [Vo]:Virtual Particles are Gravitational Dipoles

2011-11-29 Thread Horace Heffner
On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: I had always wondered about this: "Four reasons why the quantum vacuum may explain dark matter November 28, 2011 by Lisa Zyga (PhysOrg.com) -- Earlier this year, PhysOrg reported on a new idea that suggested that gravitational charges in the q

Re: [Vo]:Virtual Particles are Gravitational Dipoles

2011-11-29 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Gee wiz! I sed something sort of like this about three to six months ago in the Vort Collective. However, I'm sure what I said was stated much more crudely. I recall conjecturing that the aggregate "mass" existence of all those fleeting virtual particles could possibly in themselves contribute to