Stephen,
7Li= 7.0160 amu 4He= 4.0026 amu
+ 3H= 3.0160 amu
4He + 3H = 7.0186 amu
Net energy gain = -0.0026 amu = -2.43 MeV
Well - yes - and that pretty much explains why - as others have
noticed - that the OU energy and tritium (at the same time) are
s
Interesting. I had some questions about some details, though.
Jones Beene wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence writes,
Second, it took a while for it to sink in, but they kept talking about
"anomalously low neutron counts" -- tritium was found, with just one
neutron being emitted per ~ 10^7 tritium at
Edmund Storms wrote:
Dear Stephen,
It is my belief, based on an extensive examination of the literature,
that the few neutrons emitted from cold fusion experiments are not the
result of a "cold fusion" process, but result from a process stimulated
by relatively high energy. People have sug
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
[ ... ]
Second, it took a while for it to sink in, but they kept talking about
"anomalously low neutron counts" -- tritium was found, with just one
neutron being emitted per ~ 10^7 tritium atoms produced. I don't
understand this. They were using pure D20, so H+D-
Edmund Storms wrote:
The tritium also seems to be a secondary byproduct. Takahashi and
others feel that it is inversely proportional to the heat . . .
This conclusion is based on theory, not on observation.
Sorry, I meant neutrons. Takahashi measured neutrons during an
experiment that produ
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
It is my belief, based on an extensive examination of the literature,
that the few neutrons emitted from cold fusion experiments are not the
result of a "cold fusion" process, but result from a process
stimulated by relatively high energy. People h
Stephen A. Lawrence writes,
Second, it took a while for it to sink in, but they kept talking
about "anomalously low neutron counts" -- tritium was found,
with just one neutron being emitted per ~ 10^7 tritium atoms
produced. I don't understand this. They were using pure D20,
so H+D->T is no
Edmund Storms wrote:
It is my belief, based on an extensive examination of the
literature, that the few neutrons emitted from cold fusion
experiments are not the result of a "cold fusion" process, but
result from a process stimulated by relatively high energy. People
have suggested that such
Dear Stephen,
It is my belief, based on an extensive examination of the literature,
that the few neutrons emitted from cold fusion experiments are not the
result of a "cold fusion" process, but result from a process stimulated
by relatively high energy. People have suggested that such high en
Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
Iyengar, P.K. and M. Srinivasan. /Overview of BARC Studies in Cold
Fusion/. in /The First Annual Conference on Cold Fusion/. 1990.
University of Utah Research Park, Salt Lake City, Utah: National Cold
Fusion Institute.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IyengarPKovervie
This is important because it shows how much dynamic, promising
research was going on in India from 1989 to the mid-90s. Unfortunately,
nothing is happening there now, as far as I know. I have heard that after
Iyengar and the others retired, the enemies of cold fusion moved in and
took steps to
I did a lot of work to prepare this paper, so you folks better read it!
Jed,
Good work. I consider this paper very clear and worthy of recognition.
I am not aware of any other such paper that is so illustrative of the BARC
work, are you?
I'm curious how this paper has surfaced now, 15 ye
and deeper
jagged in appearance.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: large,old paper by..
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:48:58
-0600:
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:48:58
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Since that experience, we often have a gas inductor pump returned for service
>that shows severe erosion on the cavities directly across from the exit ports
>feeding chlorine gas or hypo liquid.
[snip]
Cl ions for
At 11:48 am 16/11/2005 -0600, Richard wrote:
>I recall my first experience with cold fusion back in the 1960's. We had
>started up the systems a few days before in a high rise condo. The next week
>we were faced with a disintegrated 4 inch copper pipe that was located on the
>discharge of a pr
Jed wrote..
The only people with a vested interest in opposing cold fusion that I know
of are the plasma fusion researchers at MIT. They are afraid that some of
their research money will be diverted to cold fusion. They were livid with
anger in March 1989. They planted stories in the newspape
RC Macaulay wrote:
Jed , I sent a link to our high speed unit at the shop. A PFD file of
2.74 mb is a little high for the boonies.
Oops. I did not notice it came out so big. I will try to slim it down.
In a few words would you give us your thoughts on WHY?? the enemies of CF
are such. What
account for their energy and dedication . You have
studied this question at length and may have the best insight.
Richard
- Original Message -
From:
Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:27
PM
Subject: New: large, old paper by Iyengar
et
See:
Iyengar, P.K. and M. Srinivasan. Overview of BARC Studies in Cold
Fusion. in The First Annual Conference on Cold Fusion. 1990.
University of Utah Research Park, Salt Lake City, Utah: National Cold
Fusion Institute.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IyengarPKoverviewof.pdf
This is important beca
19 matches
Mail list logo
