Hi everyone,
I haven't bothered to try out the CDROM drive on this machine since linux was
installed, and now with a 2.6 series kernel my CDROM drive has vanished! (or
at least from the perspective of commands like mount)
The drive is connected to the primary IDE channel, and my hard drive is
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 10:18 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi everyone,
I haven't bothered to try out the CDROM drive on this machine since linux was
installed, and now with a 2.6 series kernel my CDROM drive has vanished! (or
at least from the perspective of commands like mount)
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 10:35 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 10:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 10:18 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi everyone,
I haven't bothered to try out the CDROM drive on this machine since linux
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 1:30 PM, p p said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 10:35 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 10:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 10:18 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi everyone,
I haven't bothered to try out
On Thursday 13 January 2005 10:48 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 1:30 PM, p p said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 10:35 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 10:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 10:18 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL
here is some output from dmesg regarding all that is IDE:
PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE controller :00:1f.2
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
..perhaps a module for the IDE controller is not
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:04 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
here is some output from dmesg regarding all that is IDE:
PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE controller :00:1f.2
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:20 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:04 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
here is some output from dmesg regarding all that is IDE:
PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE controller :00:1f.2
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:20 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:04 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
here is some output from dmesg regarding all that is IDE:
PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:26 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
Can you post the output of:
mount
and:
hdparm /dev/hda
hdparm /dev/hdb
hdparm /dev/hdc
hdparm /dev/hdd
hdparm /dev/hde
Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:26 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
Can you post the output of:
mount
and:
hdparm /dev/hda
hdparm /dev/hdb
hdparm /dev/hdc
hdparm /dev/hdd
hdparm /dev/hde
hdparm
Ken Bloom said:
Here's google's answer:
[snip]
That said, we know that many useful search terms do contain such
characters. We've generated exceptions for terms like C++ and $10 and
are studying ways to enable search terms like C/net. We'll keep your
feedback in mind as we work to improve
:Here would be my reply
,Dear Google
.Somebody capable of describing What's broken under Unix will be able
figure out why punctuation *before* a search term will not significantly
alter the delivery time of search results
:Hint .See this email
,Sincerely
Peter Jay Salzman
On Thu 13 Jan
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:40:49AM -0800, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
I've always thought it would be really cool if we could search Google
using regular expressions.
I think the problem here is how it's indexed. If it sees .forward,
it just sticks it in the pile of pages that contain the
Quoting Ken Bloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here's google's answer:
It's obviously a boilerplate, canned response.
If you want to pursue the matter, you'll want to follow up with I
understand your need to use generic, prepared texts, but the one you
replied with in this case completely missed the
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:40 AM, Jonathan Stickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:26 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
Can you post the output of:
mount
and:
hdparm
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:05 PM, Rick Moen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Quoting Ken Bloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here's google's answer:
It's obviously a boilerplate, canned response.
If you want to pursue the matter, you'll want to follow up with I
understand your need to use generic, prepared
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:27 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:26 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
Can you post the output of:
mount
and:
hdparm /dev/hda
hdparm
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 15:06 -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
what bothers me is whether you use SCSI or IDE,
the mount command should STILL tell you what partitions are mounted.
Unless his mtab is screwed up. In which case it would be helpful to see
the output of cat /proc/mounts.
--
Josh
On Thursday 13 January 2005 12:06 pm, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:40 AM, Jonathan Stickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 11:26 AM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11:16 am, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thursday 13 January 2005 12:18 pm, Josh Parsons wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 15:06 -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
what bothers me is whether you use SCSI or IDE,
the mount command should STILL tell you what partitions are mounted.
Unless his mtab is screwed up. In which case it would be
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
The [cdrom] drive is connected to the primary IDE channel, and my hard drive is
connected to a serial IDE channel. As of kernel 2.6 my hard drive is accessed
as a SCSI device. However, my cdrom drive does not answer to requests sent to
hda,hdb,hdc,hdd ... nor to any SCSI
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:22 PM, Ken Herron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
The [cdrom] drive is connected to the primary IDE channel, and my hard
drive is connected to a serial IDE channel. As of kernel 2.6 my hard drive
is accessed as a SCSI device. However, my cdrom drive does
Unless you've indexed a right-to-left language that has punctuation
marks??
Or if you've indexed quoted text with the quote character before the
term?
Or if you've indexed *strong text* with the star character before the
term?
Or if you've indexed /regexp string/ or /italicized string/ with the
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 3:29 PM, p p said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:22 PM, Ken Herron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
The [cdrom] drive is connected to the primary IDE channel, and my hard
drive is connected to a serial IDE channel. As of kernel 2.6 my hard drive
is accessed as
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:31 PM, Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Unless you've indexed a right-to-left language that has punctuation
marks??
Or if you've indexed quoted text with the quote character before the
term?
Or if you've indexed *strong text* with the star character before the
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Ken Bloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here's google's answer:
It's obviously a boilerplate, canned response.
Of course!
But if there's an enough request for a feature, they'll bring it up on
their next corporate meeting.
Everyone e-mail Google!
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:34 PM, Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Ken Bloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here's google's answer:
It's obviously a boilerplate, canned response.
Of course!
But if there's an enough request for a feature, they'll
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:13:23PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
Anyone who searches for .vimrc means .vimrc. In this case, the dot is a
literal, so .forward is as distinct from forward as cat is distinct
from dog.
These (Unix dotfiles) are good special case that Google should consider
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:31 PM, Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Unless you've indexed a right-to-left language that has punctuation
marks??
Or if you've indexed quoted text with the quote character before the
term?
Or if you've indexed
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:42:12PM -0800, Mark K. Kim wrote:
Most dotfile has a corresponding /etc file with same syntax so... should
Google allow dotfile searches specifically for unix users but not their
global equivalents? I don't think a generic search engine like Google
should be that
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:34 PM, Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Ken Bloom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Here's google's answer:
It's obviously a boilerplate, canned response.
Of course!
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:42 PM, Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:31 PM, Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Unless you've indexed a right-to-left language that has punctuation
marks??
Or if you've indexed quoted
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:46:54PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:40 PM, Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
snip
A bucket for .forward, a bucket for forward., a bucket for
forward, a bucket for forward;, a bucket for forward?, a bucket for
forward!, ... and so on.
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:54 PM, Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Again, we're talking about dotfiles. Not general punctuation. So I ask:
Would that REALLY cause their database to melt down in panic?
THAT would not. But what they responded with was generic:
If we support
I'm trying to write a script which will live on my server at home and
which will ping our server at work every five minutes or so, and send an
e-mail message when it goes down or comes back up.
I've got everything working fine, except for the e-mail part. Whenever it
sends an e-mail out to my
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
I think it would be hilarious if we started a thread on slashdot:
What's broken on Google and how would you fix it?
It would be an interesting thread to read... :)
Dude, go for it!
-bill!
(automatically ignore all
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:42 PM, Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[quotes trimmed - getting way too long!]
Most dotfile has a corresponding /etc file with same syntax so...
Yes, but I don't care about /etc/application/2.1.5/config/.dotfile. I care
You have to set the sender (I guess the From: line) to an e-mail address
that is valid from the internet. localhost.localdomain is, from
unexmail.ucdavis.edu's point of view, is itself, and it knows richard
doesn't exist on its mailing system.
Also, look into sendmail's -f option.
-Mark
On
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:25:49PM -0800, Mark K. Kim wrote:
The syntax for /etc/vimrc (or more accurately, /usr/share/vim/.../vimrc)
is same as that of ~/etc/.vimrc. So why would one be motivated to search
for .vimrc when one simply wants to find out the syntax of vimrc files in
general?
Mark K. Kim said:
You have to set the sender (I guess the From: line) to an e-mail address
that is valid from the internet. localhost.localdomain is, from
unexmail.ucdavis.edu's point of view, is itself, and it knows richard
doesn't exist on its mailing system.
Actually, I do. Here is the
On Jan 13, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
Actually, I do. Here is the relevant code:
my $fromAddress='[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
my $toAddress='[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
my $body=Neo is down as of $timeString\n;
my $mailer=open ({From = $fromAddress, To = toAddress,
Subject=$subject});
print
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 12:58 -0800, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
I'm trying to write a script which will live on my server at home and
which will ping our server at work every five minutes or so, and send an
e-mail message when it goes down or comes back up.
You might be re-inventing the
Mitch Patenaude said:
The PERL module you are using is almost certainly just passing off the
mail to your underlying Mail Transport Agent (MTA). It looks like your
home machine's MTA isn't configured correctly. You can try to send the
mail directly from the command line with the command
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 3:29 PM, p p said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:22 PM, Ken Herron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
The [cdrom] drive is connected to the primary IDE channel, and my
hard
drive is connected to a serial IDE channel. As of kernel 2.6 my hard
drive
is accessed
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 1:25 PM, Mark K. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snip for brevity]
The syntax for /etc/vimrc (or more accurately, /usr/share/vim/.../vimrc)
Why more accurately?
Debian testing (my desktop):
$ls /etc/vimrc
ls: /etc/vimrc: No
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 3:52 PM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 3:29 PM, p p said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:22 PM, Ken Herron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
The [cdrom] drive is connected to the primary IDE channel, and my
hard
drive is
On Thursday 13 January 2005 12:32, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 3:29 PM, p p said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:22 PM, Ken Herron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
The [cdrom] drive is connected to the primary IDE channel, and my hard
drive is connected to a serial
Mark vs. the World...
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Bill Kendrick wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:25:49PM -0800, Mark K. Kim wrote:
The syntax for /etc/vimrc (or more accurately, /usr/share/vim/.../vimrc)
is same as that of ~/etc/.vimrc. So why would one be motivated to search
for .vimrc when
Richard S. Crawford wrote:
my $fromAddress='[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
my $toAddress='[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
my $body=Neo is down as of $timeString\n;
my $mailer=open ({From = $fromAddress, To = toAddress, Subject=$subject});
print $mailer $body;
$mailer-close();
My guess is that you're not setting the
S... Don't tell Mark. You'll ruin his day! ;-)
Pete
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 3:29 PM, Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
After seeing the volume of responses that I have seen pop up in the
last few hours, here's what I think google should do: They should have
a secret option punct: that
On Thursday 13 January 2005 02:50 pm, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 3:52 PM, Dylan Beaudette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 3:29 PM, p p said:
On Thu 13 Jan 05, 12:22 PM, Ken Herron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
The [cdrom] drive is
BTW, are you running the script as a root or as a user? Try as root and
see if that works.
-Mark
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Ken Herron wrote:
Richard S. Crawford wrote:
my $fromAddress='[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
my $toAddress='[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
my $body=Neo is down as of $timeString\n;
my
53 matches
Mail list logo
