Hi All,
I need a help in investigation of one problem with TAP interface. I try to
develop plugin that inspects packets send from Host Linux via TAP interface and
take some actions on them. Scenario is like this:
Linux Host Tap -->vpp tap0 --> other vpp interface. My node is set to be
visited be
If I do not manually assign cores to nic, and let vpp assign cores, vpp
only assign one core per nic queue. If I also assign number of queues to
10, all cores are used. Otherwise, only core 4 and 6 are assigned to each
nic, which has only one queue.
Probably, there is some smart logic adaptively a
Hi Jon,
Your understanding is correct, VLAN tag rewrite should not be limited to
sub-interfaces only. It is a generic mechanism that should be allowed on most
interfaces types, including tunnels. It is the users’ responsibility to make
sure the configured VLAN tag rewrite operations match the
John, et al.,
The vppctl command "set interface l2 tag-rewrite" and the associated API
call "l2_interface_vlan_tag_rewrite" allow an interface to have an L2
tag-rewrite rule
applied or removed from an interface. That interface is usually a subif,
but it
may also apply to a regular (ethernet) inte
Thanks Chris!
-daw-
On 11/11/2019 9:37 AM, Chris Luke wrote:
Looks like we were overdue for Coverity stalling, which it did a week or so
ago. I've prodded it, but it may be a Coverity issue.
Chris.
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Noreply Jenkins
Sent: Monday
Thank you!
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:39 AM Dave Wallace wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Please review https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/ci-management/+/23364
>
> ci-management patches require a non-author code review before merging.
>
> Thanks,
> -daw-
>
> On 11/10/2019 11:24 AM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote:
>
> Can we u
Paul,
Please review https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/ci-management/+/23364
ci-management patches require a non-author code review before merging.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 11/10/2019 11:24 AM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote:
Can we update vpp-checkstyle-verify-master so that it actually calls
make checkstyle, like it
Looks like we were overdue for Coverity stalling, which it did a week or so
ago. I've prodded it, but it may be a Coverity issue.
Chris.
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Noreply Jenkins
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 9:01 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; e...@cisco.
Coverity run failed today.
[Error replacing 'FILE' - Workspace is not accessible]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14559): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14559
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/52872328/21656
Group Owner:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:20 PM Jerome Tollet (jtollet)
wrote:
>
> Did you have a look at
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1908/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/container_memif.html#
> ?
Thanks for this link. I hadn't seen this before.
raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: Y
Did you have a look at
https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1908/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/container_memif.html#
?
Jerome
Le 11/11/2019 09:55, « vpp-dev@lists.fd.io au nom de Raj »
a écrit :
Hello all,
I am looking to see if any one has attempted to connec
Hello all,
I am looking to see if any one has attempted to connect two VPP using
memif and what pps numbers is seen over memif interface? It would be
great if the VPP config too can be shares so that I can recreate it
locally.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive a
Hi,
There is no such mechanism.
Maybe call fib_table_entry_path_remove() on each prefix for which you
previously added such a path. I’m assuming you added it, it’s not polite to
remove some-one else’s path.
FIB already reacts to certain changes, like interface down or BFD down and
adjust forw
13 matches
Mail list logo
