Re: [vpp-dev] getting a rid of vpe.api

+1 :) >From the 'consumer of api' side... the 'catch all' nature of vpe.api makes VPP less usable. Proper modularity would improve that, and be a benefit beyond the ones Damjan already mentioned. That said, ccing the some of the GoVPP folks, because there are some (hopefully quite tractable)

Re: [vpp-dev] Adding new route via ipv6 link-local

Neale, Could this be hitting the same /32 issue I'm in the process of fixing with https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/33495 ? If the interface has an IPv6 /32 assigned... it would be IPv6 enabled, but fib_sas would fail to get its source address, ND would fail, and we'd hit the SEGV we are seeing on

Re: [vpp-dev] Adding new route via ipv6 link-local

Got it. That makes sense :) Ed On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 9:58 AM Neale Ranns wrote: > Hi Ed, > > > > When creating an adjacency for the first time we send out a probe packet > (ARP/ND) to see if the peer will resolve it. > > > > /neale > > > > *From: *Ed Warnicke > *Date: *Friday, 20 August

Re: [vpp-dev] Adding new route via ipv6 link-local

Neale, Question... looking at the trace it looks like we are having an issue with fib_sas6_get ... could you help me understand why we are calling fib_sas6_get in this situation? Ed On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 9:49 AM Neale Ranns wrote: > > > Hi Ed, > > > > It does. But in this case the command

Re: [vpp-dev] Adding new route via ipv6 link-local

Neale, I'm a bit confused... I had previously thought that *adding* an IPv6 address to a link *did* IPv6 enable it... Ed On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 9:20 AM Neale Ranns wrote: > Hi Artem, Stanislav, > > > > I agree graceful handling is needed, return false if there is no link > local. > > > > If

Re: [vpp-dev] memif: failed: no source address for egress interface

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 2:39 AM Neale Ranns wrote > > > Again: GCP does this. Calico for K8s (the most used K8s CNI plugin) does > this. Its basically the direction Cloud is going in the generic. > > > > Ah well, that’s different, if all the cool kids are doing it, then it must > be the right

Re: [vpp-dev] memif: failed: no source address for egress interface

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 7:40 AM Neale Ranns wrote: > > > i would argue the contrary, not subnetting (i.e. using /32) is not a valid > approach to subnetting. > Again: GCP does this. Calico for K8s (the most used K8s CNI plugin) does this. Its basically the direction Cloud is going in the

Re: [vpp-dev] memif: failed: no source address for egress interface

Neale, /32s on interfaces that talk to other things are actually getting to be the standard in Cloud. GCP uses /32s in their VMs exclusively. Calico uses /32s on on Pod interfaces. Its a common use case. Ed On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:03 AM Neale Ranns wrote: > > > Hi Artem, > > > > I think

[vpp-dev] Draft revision of FD.io Community Doc (Governance)

As part of the ongoing discussion around evolving the TSC, and in keeping with the previously socialized slide deck . Please provide feedback on this PR

Re: [vpp-dev] New Committer Proposal

+1 On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 1:50 PM Florin Coras wrote: > +1 > > Florin > > > On Mar 31, 2021, at 10:58 AM, Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io me@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > > > > > Dear VPP Committers, > > > > I would like to propose Roy Fan Zhang from Intel as a new VPP committer. > > Fan made

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp musl integration and CI

Dave, Any chance we could get vpp down to a single statically linked binary? That's roughly the way things are trending with Go... and it has a lot of very very nice advantages in a containerized Cloud Native world. Ed On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:11 PM Dave Barach wrote: > I've been down this

Re: [vpp-committers] [vpp-dev] VPP committers: VPP PTL vote

+1 On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:44 PM Dave Wallace wrote: > +1 > > On 9/25/20 3:13 PM, Dave Barach via lists.fd.io wrote: > > Folks, > > > > The self-nomination period closed yesterday. We had one self-nomination, > from Damjan Marion. At this point, we can proceed with a vote. > > > > I’m sure

Re: [tsc] [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature

In today's TSC meeting we had a discussion of what, if any, role the TSC should play in the renaming process around nomenclatures like master/slave whitelist/blacklist etc. It's important to understand that the TSC in FD.io, quite intentionally, does not and cannot tell the projects what to do.

Re: [tsc] [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature

I tend to prefer permitlist/denylist personally... but I may have configured one too many ACLs in my life... Ed On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:49 PM Christian Hopps wrote: > > > > On Jul 14, 2020, at 1:20 PM, St Leger, Jim > wrote: > > > > I believe the DPDK community converged on: > >

Re: [tsc] [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature

Steven, That sounds good to me. I tend to see this as "Get the good ideas for possible replacements out there so the folks doing the work have some inspiration for the choices". Please don't take the link as suggesting that list is the end all and be all of possible choices :) Ed On Tue, Jul

Re: [tsc] [vpp-dev] Replacing master/slave nomenclature

This is a pretty good summary of various suggestions for replacement terms: https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-team-approves-new-terminology-bans-terms-like-blacklist-and-slave/ Ed On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:36 AM Jerome Tollet via lists.fd.io wrote: > Hi Steven, > Please note that per this

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp project committer nomination: Benoit Ganne

+1 On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:45 AM Dave Barach via lists.fd.io wrote: > +1... Dave > > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Dave Barach > via lists.fd.io > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 7:40 AM > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io > Subject: [vpp-dev] vpp project committer

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp project committers: formal vote to add Matt Smith as a vpp committer

+1 On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:52 AM Ole Troan wrote: > +1 > > Best regards, > Ole > > > On 2 Mar 2020, at 15:15, d...@barachs.net wrote: > > > > VPP committers, please vote +1, 0, -1 on adding Matt Smith ( > mgsm...@netgate.com) as a vpp project committer. > > Matt has contributed O(100) merged

[vpp-dev] 2020 LFN Governing Board Committer Representative Self-Nomination Period Open

-- Forwarded message - From: Casey Cain Date: Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:31 PM Subject: 2020 LFN Governing Board Committer Representative Self-Nomination Period Open To: Hello, everyone. This is to inform you that the self-nomination period for the LFN Governing Board Committer

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] Project Proposal for uDPI

Do you have a preference as to dates? Ed On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:44 PM Ni, Hongjun wrote: > Hi Ed, > > > > Thank you for scheduling the proposal review. > > > > I think a TSC meeting after Aug 21 is better, to follow the FD.io TSC > policy. > > > > Thanks, > > Hongjun > > > > *From:* Ed

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] Project Proposal for uDPI

Hongjun, You guys are eligible for project creation review starting at the Aug 21 TSC meeting I believe (based on sending the notification to the TSC on Aug 8) ... when would you like to schedule for that Thu's TSC meeting, or a subsequent one? Ed On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:11 PM Ni, Hongjun

[vpp-dev] REMINDER: LFN Booth Demo Ideas for ONS Europe Due 7/31

FD.io folks, We hope that you are planning to attend ONS Europe, September 23-25, in Antwerp, Belgium . Those in attendance at the last three ONS events will recall that we hosted an *LF Networking Booth* that

Re: [vpp-dev] OpenSuse builds failing for stable/1901

> An osleap box reports correctly for me: >>>> docker run --shm-size=1024m -it opensuse/leap:leap-15 /bin/bash >>>> *ee4938c281e4:/ #* cat /etc/os-release >>>> NAME="openSUSE Leap" >>>> VERSION="15.0 Beta" >>>> ID=&q

Re: [vpp-dev] OpenSuse builds failing for stable/1901

t; > > VERSION="15.0 Beta" > > ID="opensuse" > > ID_LIKE="suse" > > VERSION_ID="15.0" > > PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Leap 15.0 Beta" > > ANSI_COLOR="0;32" > > CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:leap:15.0" >

[vpp-dev] OpenSuse builds failing for stable/1901

In cherry picking some fixes back to stable/1901, I've found that the builds for 1901 for OpenSuse Leap seem to be failing during install-deps: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-1901-osleap15/77/console *10:50:21* No provider of 'libboost_thread1_68_0-devel-1.68.0' found. Which looks like

Re: [vpp-dev] New vpp project committer nomination: Paul Vinciguerra

+1 On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 7:21 AM Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: > +1 > > On 27 Feb 2019, at 14:20, Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io < > dbarach=cisco@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > +1... Dave > > *From:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io *On Behalf Of *Dave > Barach via Lists.Fd.Io > *Sent:* Wednesday,

Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io minisummit at Kubecon EU (May 21-23, Barcelona)

+ hicn and sweetcomb, who's lists were misconfigured the first time I sent it :) Ed On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 1:04 PM Ed Warnicke wrote: > Traditionally in the past FD.io has held collocated minisummits at Kubecon > (NA and EU). > > We are fortunate to have budget to do Kubecon EU, Kubecon NA,

[vpp-dev] FD.io minisummit at Kubecon EU (May 21-23, Barcelona)

Traditionally in the past FD.io has held collocated minisummits at Kubecon (NA and EU). We are fortunate to have budget to do Kubecon EU, Kubecon NA, and one other collocated event (probably best to be held in Asia and possibly at an embedded event). In the course of discussing this, the FD.io

Re: [vpp-dev] wireshark vpp dispatch trace dissector merged

Woot! On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:25 AM Florin Coras wrote: > Awesome! > > Florin > > On Jan 17, 2019, at 5:11 AM, Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io < > dbarach=cisco@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > I’m pleased to announce that our dispatch trace wireshark dissector has > been merged. At some point in the

[vpp-dev] Kubecon EU CFP closes Jan 18

For folks in the FD.io community looking to submit talks to the Kubecon EU CFP: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/kubecon-cloudnativecon-europe-2019/cfp/ It closes Jan 18. Ed -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11684):

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP/Envoy integration status

Checkout: https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/5177 The Envoy side modularity work is in progress :) Ed On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:45 PM dado via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: > Hi Florin, > > Thanks for the quick response. Do you know who I may contact regarding > about VPP/Envoy integration status?

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] Project Proposal for Sweetcomb

; > > > Thank you again, > > Hongjun > > > > *From:* t...@lists.fd.io [mailto:t...@lists.fd.io] *On Behalf Of *Ni, > Hongjun > *Sent:* Thursday, November 8, 2018 10:57 PM > *To:* Ni, Hongjun ; Edward Warnicke < > hagb...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* t...@l

[vpp-dev] Call for Demos at Kubecon Seattle Dec 11-13

FD.io will have a booth at Kubecon Seattle Dec 11-13. This is a call out to the community for demo proposals to show in the booth. Please respond with a brief description of a demo you would like to run in the FD.io booth. If you wish to reply privately, please ensure you include Trishan on your

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] Project Proposal for Sweetcomb

From:* t...@lists.fd.io [mailto:t...@lists.fd.io] *On Behalf Of *Edward > Warnicke > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:15 PM > *To:* Ni, Hongjun > *Cc:* t...@lists.fd.io; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Wang, Drenfong < > drenfong.w...@intel.com>; ??? ; > chen...@huachentel.com

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] Project Proposal for Sweetcomb

Hongjun, Thank you for the proposal :) Per the FD.io technical charter, all proposals must be out for public review for two weeks prior to approval by the TSC. I believe this makes Nov 8 the earliest TSC meeting where we could approve at the TSC. Would you like to schedule the project creation

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem downloading always VPP 19.01 instead of VPP 18.07

Perhaps a bit of an explanation about how the repos are organized might help: https://packagecloud.io/fdio/release - Only released packages. The latest in there should be 18.07.1 (at least until 18.10 releases soon!) https://packagecloud.io/fdio/1807 - the throttle branch for 1807 packages. Not

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 18.07.1 RPM release packages available in Centos

Woot! Ed On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:45 AM Thomas F Herbert wrote: > All, > > 18.07.1 release packages are in Centos mirrors. > > To install Centos update release packages of VPP on a Centos, install the > Centos NFV SIG yum repo and then install vpp as follows. > > yum install

Re: [vpp-dev] how to pull a 18.07 code??

git checkout v18.07.1 will get you to the latest release code If you want the stable/18.07 branch: git checkout stable/1807 Ed On September 24, 2018 at 1:43:06 PM, Jit Mehta ( jitendra.harshad...@gmail.com) wrote: Could someone tell me how do I pull the 18.07 code? I have never pulled tree

Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Fwd: [vpp-dev] Failing to create untagged sub-interface

Guys, Anyone have any thoughts on this? Ed On September 20, 2018 at 12:01:05 PM, Bly, Mike (m...@ciena.com) wrote: Ed/Keith, et al, What Vijay is digging into is trying to understand how to provide the following sub-interface setup on a common/single physical NIC. I am hoping you can shed

Re: 答复: [E] [vpp-dev] Build a telecom-class Security gateway device with VPP

The normal pattern in VPP is what we call ‘Dataplane Management Agents’. VPP is an amazing dataplane, feature rich and fast. It exposes a fast and rich API via a shared memory message bus, and we autogenerate C, C++, Python, Java, Lua, and Go APIs for it. When you want to expose some element of

Re: [vpp-dev] DO NOT MERGE ANY PATCHES onto stable/1807

Due to ongoing technical difficulties with the 18.07 merge jobs, still being worked out, please continue to not merge patches on stable/1807. Ed On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 5:48 PM Edward Warnicke wrote: > Due to some technical difficulties with the 18.07 merge jobs we will be > unable to r

Re: [vpp-dev] vppctl start error

Could you attach your new startup.conf file? I can't be completely certain from the info provided... but it looks a lot like vpp didn't really start... which might be because your edit of the startup.conf file produced a syntactically invalid file. You might also use systemctl to grab any logs

Re: [vpp-dev] DO NOT MERGE ANY PATCHES onto stable/1807

Due to some technical difficulties with the 18.07 merge jobs we will be unable to resolve till tomorrow, please continue to not merge patches on stable/1807 Ed On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 3:12 PM Edward Warnicke wrote: > I am in the process of doing the 18.07.1 release. Will let you know w

[vpp-dev] DO NOT MERGE ANY PATCHES onto stable/1807

I am in the process of doing the 18.07.1 release. Will let you know when it is done and stable/1807 can be merged to again. Ed -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10495): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10495 Mute This Topic:

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 18.07 RPM release packages available in Centos

Woot! Ed On September 13, 2018 at 2:29:41 PM, Thomas F Herbert (therb...@redhat.com) wrote: Jerome, 18.07 release packages are in Centos mirrors. To install Centos release packages of VPP on a Centos, install the Centos NFV SIG yum repo and then install vpp as follows. yum install

[vpp-dev] Cutting 18.07.1 release Thu Sept 13

I would like to cut the vpp 18.07.1 dot release on Thu Sept 13. We have three outstanding patches still against stable/1807: 1) nat: fix busy ports of each thread - which came in just this morning, and looks serious 2) Fix create memif socket

Re: [vpp-dev] 18.07.1 dot release

You can send the patch now to vpp/master … master is open for business :) 18.07 is on the stable/1807 branch :) Ed On September 4, 2018 at 12:24:52 PM, Gonsalves, Avinash (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) (avinash.gonsal...@nokia.com) wrote: Done. Will send the patch for review after 18.07.1 is out.

Re: [vpp-dev] 18.07.1 dot release

Second that… bug fixes in 18.07.1… new features on master for 18.10 Ed On September 4, 2018 at 12:21:28 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io ( dmarion=me@lists.fd.io) wrote: Dear Avinash, Dot releases are only for bug fixes, new features should not go there... -- Damjan On 4 Sep 2018, at

[vpp-dev] 18.07.1 dot release

A number of fixes have been added to the stable/1807 branch since we cut the 18.07 release. Several of them merit a dot release. I’d like to be able to do an 18.07.1 dot release this week or next, and wanted to open the discussion here for folks who may have fixes they would like to see in that

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP and mlx4 issue

Brandon, Looping in Amir from Mellanox who is trying to get to the bottom of these kinds of issues. Ed On August 14, 2018 at 10:05:35 AM, Brandon Kopinski (bkopinsk...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, I have been trying to use VPP with the mlx4 pmd. However, VPP is not processing any packets. My

Re: [vpp-dev] :: vppctl fails to start in Container (Centos 7.5.1804)

: failed to initialize TLS CA chain dpdk_config: mount failed 1 Seems like an selinux issue or what? Could I get any help there? :) Best Regards, Omer On 2018-08-13 22:43, Edward Warnicke wrote: We do have an se linux package that should in principle let you keep working with se linux enforce

Re: [vpp-dev] :: vppctl fails to start (Centos 7.5.1804)

in /etc/selinux/config Restarted the machine, and it worked. Best Regards, Omer On 2018-08-13 22:21, Edward Warnicke wrote: This feels like SE Linux may be involved... Ed On August 13, 2018 at 12:17:09 PM, omer.maj...@sofioni.com ( omer.maj...@sofioni.com) wrote: Hi, I've built VPP

Re: [vpp-dev] :: vppctl fails to start (Centos 7.5.1804)

This feels like SE Linux may be involved… Ed On August 13, 2018 at 12:17:09 PM, omer.maj...@sofioni.com ( omer.maj...@sofioni.com) wrote: Hi, I've built VPP on centos 7.5.1804, took the RPM packages to another machine to deploy VPP there. After installing RPM packages there when I run

Re: [vpp-dev] Traffic generator

Have a look at: https://wiki.fd.io/view/Trex :) Ed On August 8, 2018 at 8:07:45 AM, Gulakh (holoogul...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, I have setup a VPLS scenario in VPP and now I want to test its performance to see whether it is able to handle customer traffics of 10G/s. i.e. customer is generating

[vpp-dev] VPP Release 18.07 is out!

VPP Release 18.07 is out. Packages are in the usual places. Ed -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9978): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/9978 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/23900471/21656 Group Owner:

[vpp-dev] VPP 18.07 Release Milestone RC2 is complete!

Folks, I have created the v18.07-rc2 tag on stable/1807 I will be verifying that 18.07-rc2 build artifacts have been uploaded to nexus.fd.io. VPP 18.07 Release Milestone RC2 is complete! As a reminder, the VPP 18.07 Release next Monday Jul 30, 2018.

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [vpp-dev] 18.07 RC1: stable/1807 branch pulled, master reopened

, 2018 7:19 AM *To:* Edward Warnicke *Cc:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [vpp-dev] 18.07 RC1: stable/1807 branch pulled, master reopened I can see that we have 18.11-rc0 tag. Have we decided to break our 3-month cadence? -- Damjan On 17 Jul 2018, at 04:27, Edward Warnicke

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver) packages

Michal, I am delighted to know you are excited about vpp on Bionic :) I am currently working with the LF IT staff to fix the issues with the Bionic repo, they are on the nexus side, not the VPP side. Thank you for raising the issue. It helps :) Ed On July 17, 2018 at 6:47:46 AM, Michal

[vpp-dev] 18.07 RC1: stable/1807 branch pulled, master reopened

We've reached 18.07 RC1. The stable/1807 branch has been pulled. Master is reopened. Due to a maintenance window today, I have not been able to test merge pushing of packages to apt/yum repos for stable/1807. I will do so tomorrow. Ed -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages

[vpp-dev] [tsc] Seeking LFN Booth Demo Ideas for ONS Europe: FD.io

FYI On June 12, 2018 at 2:32:25 PM, Brandon Wick (bw...@linuxfoundation.org) wrote: Hello FD.io Community: Those in attendance at OSN North America in Los Angeles last March will recall that we hosted an *LF Networking Booth* that showcased 8 compelling, community-driven demos from the LFN

Re: [vpp-dev] GTPu

Please do push a patch :) Ed On June 8, 2018 at 4:16:19 AM, Kingwel Xie (kingwel@ericsson.com) wrote: Hi all, We are working on improving gtpu plugin, to make it better comply with 3GPP standard. Here is the brief of what we have done: 1. Path management – gtpu-process was added

[vpp-dev] Volunteering for Release Manager Roll for 18.07

Guys, I think its come around to be my turn to look after Release Management details for VPP. VPP committers, are you OK with me taking up that mantle? Is there someone else who wants to? Also, I've been poking at the VPP 18.07 Release Plan and have a draft here:

Re: [vpp-dev] containers interconnect via memif

Sara, A couple question: What are you wanting to connect via memif in your containers? Is it a CNF (Cloud-native Network Function... ie something meant to process packets) or a traditional app (think webserver, databace, etc)? Ed On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:37 AM Sara Gittlin

Re: [vpp-dev] git.fd.io not updating

Could we get this to a helpdesk ticket to drive to close? :) Ed On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:08 AM Ed Kern wrote: > well it certainly has…we just need it to accept the new key. > > Ed > > > On May 22, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: > > I noticed

Re: [vpp-dev] question about the VCL

Xyxue, If you want to move raw IP/Ethernet around, I'd suggest looking at memif :) Ed On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:44 AM Florin Coras wrote: > Hi Xyxue, > > No, the stack does not support IPPROTO_RAW. Given that this is a user > space stack and that you have access to

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP/AArch64 weekly meeting time

A few observations: 1) Meeting Fri means that any issues uncovered in the meeting will be deferred to the following week 2) I generally can't make that time slot (not that my ability to attend should be the deciding factor). Ed On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:05 PM Tina Tsou

[vpp-dev] [FD.io] CFP: FD.io minisummit @Kubecon EU May 2-4 in Copenhagen.

Folks, let's get your talk proposals in :) Ed -- Forwarded message - From: Trishan de Lanerolle Date: Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:08 AM Subject: [FD.io] CFP: FD.io minisummit @Kubecon EU May 2-4 in Copenhagen. To: Call for

[vpp-dev] FD.io minisummit @ Kubecon EU May 2-4 Copenhagen CFP opens

FD.io will be holding a minisummit @Kubecon EU May 2-4 in Copenhagen. Please submit your talks at the CFP here: https://fd.io/event/fd-io-mini-summit-at-kubecon-cloudnativecon-europe/ Ed

Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io ARM virtual key signing Wed Mar 14 6am PST

If you could reply to me privately with your: (name, GPG fingerprint) that would greatly expedite the key signing today at 6am PST. Please note, I *will* have to verify your ID/fingerprint on the call, but having it in front of my as a reference helps tremendously expedite the process. Ed On

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] fd.io Community Goals and Objectives for reporting to the LFN board

Ray, Thanks for calling attention to this. I've taken the feedback I've received thus far and added it to: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jUoqWt9tbMaiUsLE2IaUSSbTcjKN6c3cQ-PXID5nz0k/edit?usp=sharing It's a rough cut, let's work it together as a community overnight and at the TSC

Re: [vpp-dev] Error when trying to add interface to vpp on ARM server.

Looping in JohnD, who may be able to help... :) Ed On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:43 AM adarsh m via vpp-dev wrote: > Hi, > > After removing socket-mem now vpp is stable but when we try to connect > through CLI connection is refused. > > > ubuntu@vasily:~$ sudo service vpp

Re: [vpp-dev] Congrats to Marco Varlese on his election as a vpp project committer

Woot! Ed On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:57 AM Dave Wallace wrote: > Congrats Marco! > -daw- > > On 2/8/2018 11:23 AM, Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote: > > It gives me great pleasure to announce Marco’s election as a vpp project > committer, confirmed a few minutes ago by the fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] Tagging for vpp 17.01-rc0

pp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io > <vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io>] *On Behalf Of *Luke, Chris > *Sent:* Thursday, November 3, 2016 1:29 PM > *To:* Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Tagging for vpp 17.01-rc0 > > +

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

ved by VPP. > > Thanks, > > - Pierre > > > Le 26 oct. 2016 à 23:45, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) < > mkons...@cisco.com> a écrit : > > Excellent, thanks Ed! And let’s see … > > -Maciek > > On 26 Oct 2016, at 22:40, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmai

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

n) < mkons...@cisco.com> wrote: > Excellent, thanks Ed! And let’s see … > > -Maciek > > On 26 Oct 2016, at 22:40, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maciek, > > Looks like the patch was based at a point in the past that was pointing to > the old CSIT branc

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vhost multi-queue patch - verify job failing

; *Cc:* Andrew Theurer <atheu...@redhat.com>; Douglas Shakshober < > dsh...@redhat.com>; Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; Bill > Michalowski <bmich...@redhat.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>; Rashid > Khan <rk...@redhat.com>; kris...@redha

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] DO_NOT_MERGE

'm > a committer on that project. > > You can make drafts public but all that will do is force folks who like > that feature (private draft) to go to github where we don't get our > CSIT/verify jobs. > > (Drafts are an easy way to check for CSIT compliance before publish. Just &

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

did. Feel free to revert the patch > and I'll take a look at it again. That java build stuff is a real mess... > > Klement > > On Oct 20, 2016 6:22 PM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> > <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This change: > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

This change: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3486/ Was touching that part of the world... *if* it is a race condition, is it possible that this patch got lucky, and the ones that followed did not? Ed On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Dave Wallace wrote: > Maciek, > > This

Re: [vpp-dev] Can't build Centos Vagrant Master

doing your vagrant up. Ed On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: > In which case my theory is likely incorrect ;) > > Ed > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Keith Burns <alaga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> But aren't these RSA

Re: [vpp-dev] Can't build Centos Vagrant Master

At a guess... here's what I think is happening (because it bit me). DSA keys have recently been deprecated. You may need to create a new RSA key and add it to your keys in gerrit. Ed On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Keith Burns wrote: >