On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:14:58AM +0100, Thomas Hug wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:04, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> > > Is it then possible to install a vserver with another default gateway, eg.
> > > the server has IP address 192.168.3.61, netmask 255.255.255.0 - and uses
> > > default ga
Come to irc.oftc.net #vserver I'm infowolfe if you have any questions.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:vserver-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ian douglas
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Vserver] vserver & gentoo, anyo
hi,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:04, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > Is it then possible to install a vserver with another default gateway, eg.
> > the server has IP address 192.168.3.61, netmask 255.255.255.0 - and uses
> > default gateway 192.168.3.1 instead ?
>
> yes, just setup a separate routing table f
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, James MacLean wrote:
> > take a 2.4.23-rc1 as you patched it, _without_ the RT stuff
>
> This one Oopses. Fresh 2.4.22 + 23rc1 patch + vserver-1.1.3.
>
> > and a 2.4.22 with vs1.00 with the RT stuff
> This one was Ok, as are the old vservers.
Arg, I tested this one withou
Hi Herbert:
> I really would appreciate if you could test the following:
>
> take a 2.4.23-rc1 as you patched it, _without_ the RT stuff
This one Oopses. Fresh 2.4.22 + 23rc1 patch + vserver-1.1.3.
> and a 2.4.22 with vs1.00 with the RT stuff
This one was Ok, as are the old vservers.
Sorry I
Hi Community!
a new linux-vserver development release (1.1.4)
is available at
http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/d_release/v1.1.4/
you can download all-in-one patches for 2.4.21/22
and 2.4.23-rc1 as well as tar archives of all the
splitups ...
vserver-0.23/24/25/26 tools won't work with this
re
Hello,
I just released version 0.25 of util-vserver which can be downloaded at
http://savannah.nongnu.org/files/?group=util-vserver
It is mainly a bugfix release; the new items in detail are:
* BUGFIX: this version fixes handling of ctx >= 32768
* experimental support for new resour
> I did a Gentoo virtualization last night and I'm emerge -e world'ing right
> now, if you need to contact me directly, please do, I'd be happy to help
> support you over the phone or any instant message clients.
any 'gtochas' that you care to share up-front?
I've never even seen gentoo, I'm just
I did a Gentoo virtualization last night and I'm emerge -e world'ing right
now, if you need to contact me directly, please do, I'd be happy to help
support you over the phone or any instant message clients.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:vserver-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:12:37PM -0800, ian douglas wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I lost my local archive of vserver Emails ... Outlook happily deleted the
> entire folder for me and made it happily unrecoverable.
>
> Just curious if anyone's had success installing Linux 'gentoo' as a base and
> gettin
Hey all,
I lost my local archive of vserver Emails ... Outlook happily deleted the
entire folder for me and made it happily unrecoverable.
Just curious if anyone's had success installing Linux 'gentoo' as a base and
getting vserver to behave well on it? I'm hoping to play around with it a
little
Dnia Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:28:08PM +, Holger Rabbach napisa(a):
> Hi,
>
> >courier-imap / courier-pop3 is one of programs, that tries to bind "*"
> >at ipv6 level only and thus also asks for ipv4 addresses. However that
> >way it circumvents your vserver contexts and binds port 143 (or port
Hi,
courier-imap / courier-pop3 is one of programs, that tries to bind "*"
at ipv6 level only and thus also asks for ipv4 addresses. However that
way it circumvents your vserver contexts and binds port 143 (or port
110) at all ip's.
yep - there's a simple way around that, of course - tell the Cour
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 19:40, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:15:11PM +0100, Dariusz Rubinkiewicz wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Dnia Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:08:26PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl napisa(a):
> > > okay, this is a trace of the 'forking
Hi Folks!
this is the first publicly available test patch
for Linux 2.6 vserver testing ...
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.0-test9-vs0.01.diff
it works with recent (util-vserver) tools and
allows to create static contexts (no CAP stuff,
no flags, etc yet) so you can play ar
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:45:22PM +0100, Brian Ipsen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just wonder If the IP settings on the root server are:
>
> IP: 192.168.3.15
> Mask: 255.255.255.0
> Gateway: 192.168.3.11
>
> Is it then possible to install a vserver with another default gateway, eg.
> the server has
Hi!
I just wonder If the IP settings on the root server are:
IP: 192.168.3.15
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.3.11
Is it then possible to install a vserver with another default gateway, eg.
the server has IP address 192.168.3.61, netmask 255.255.255.0 - and uses
default gateway 192.168
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:48:25AM +1030, Geoffrey D. Bennett wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Just wanted to report some success running Fedora Core 1 in a vserver
> (Red Hat 7.3 base) as well as share a problem I had and a script I
> wrote to make future FC1 vserver installs trivial (for me, at least).
>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:15:11PM +0100, Dariusz Rubinkiewicz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dnia Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:08:26PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl napisa(a):
> > okay, this is a trace of the 'forking' parent
> > probably because it daemonizes() ... so we either
Hi there,
Just wanted to report some success running Fedora Core 1 in a vserver
(Red Hat 7.3 base) as well as share a problem I had and a script I
wrote to make future FC1 vserver installs trivial (for me, at least).
First the problem: the glibc that comes with FC1 didn't like running
some progra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dnia Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:08:26PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl napisa(a):
> okay, this is a trace of the 'forking' parent
> probably because it daemonizes() ... so we either
> need a run with '-debug' or whatever keeps it from
> forking, or strace -fF -s 4
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:55:00PM +0100, Dariusz Rubinkiewicz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dnia Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:52:18PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl napisa(a):
> > use strace (version 4.5 and higher) to analyze the
> > actions you program takes, and which ports/ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dnia Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:52:18PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl napisa(a):
> use strace (version 4.5 and higher) to analyze the
> actions you program takes, and which ports/addresses it
> tries to bind to ... make this available via web, and
> I'll have a l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Lawrence) writes:
>> > that would do a context id check (ie where's it coming from and what's
>> > it trying to apply those changes to) and then if everything checks out,
>> > does the vserver start/stop/restart.
>>
>> How will you do this resolving for vserver-in-a-vserve
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:39:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello..
> I have problem with courier-pop. When I try start courier-pop
> i get this information:
> /etc/init.d/courier-pop start
> Starting Courier POP3 server:bind: Address a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello..
I have problem with courier-pop. When I try start courier-pop
i get this information:
/etc/init.d/courier-pop start
Starting Courier POP3 server:bind: Address already in use
ll_daemon_start: Resource temporarily unavailable
but:
telnet local
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:10:46AM +1100, Charles Dale wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
Hi Chuck!
> The recent Christmas joviality spurred me into some doc writing. I started a
> bit of reorganisation at good ol' linux-vserver.org.
don't let anybody stop you from doing this ;)
thanks for the help, we appre
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:04:19PM +, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Enrico Scholz wrote:
>
> > > that would do a context id check (ie where's it coming from and what's
> > > it trying to apply those changes to) and then if everything checks out,
> > > does the vserver start/stop
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> > that would do a context id check (ie where's it coming from and what's
> > it trying to apply those changes to) and then if everything checks out,
> > does the vserver start/stop/restart.
>
> How will you do this resolving for vserver-in-a-vserver?
W
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:16:16AM -0500, Allen D. Parker II wrote:
> Herbert, still having a problem (after this patch) with /dev/initctl :(
> kernel 2.4.22-vs1.1.3 util-vserver-0.24
maybe Enrico or/and Jack could have a look at this
issue and of course include the gentoo patch if
it makes sense
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:46:34AM -0400, James MacLean wrote:
> Hi Dariush,
>
> Old vserver for me is fine (2.4.22 + c17). Wanted to make up a new kernel,
> saw this new branch of Vserver with 2.4.23-rc1 patches ready to go, so
> went that route :).
>
> I also patched in/ turned on the realtim
Hi Everyone,
The recent Christmas joviality spurred me into some doc writing. I started a
bit of reorganisation at good ol' linux-vserver.org.
I've created a Step-by-Step Guide. It's rather malnourished at the moment
(no it's not as simple as it might seem!), but remember that, unlike at the
zoo,
Hi Dariush,
Old vserver for me is fine (2.4.22 + c17). Wanted to make up a new kernel,
saw this new branch of Vserver with 2.4.23-rc1 patches ready to go, so
went that route :).
I also patched in/ turned on the realtime kernel. It patched clean, but
hey, who knows ;(. But the Oops suggests it'
I think that typically when servers respond like this that it's the disk I/O
subsystem that has locked up?
Sam
> I have 2 servers who keep crashing, sometimes every few hours... I am
> still working on a console solution so I don't know the exact place
> where the problem is.
>
> The servers are
> experience need only do a "netstat -nap --inet" from the root server when
> a vserver it alive... Or atleast, that is all that I do :).
Sorry, I haven't been following, you get this oops on 2.4.23rc1 with new
vserver and with old vserver?
I'm putting together 2.4.23rc1 this week, so far I foun
As a follow-up, sparc64 worked perfectly.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:17:58AM +1100, Alec Thomas wrote:
> Herbert,
>
> I would be more than happy to test sparc64 for any new
> releases.
>
> Regards,
> Alec
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:22:40PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >
> > Hi Community!
Herbert, still having a problem (after this patch) with /dev/initctl :(
kernel 2.4.22-vs1.1.3 util-vserver-0.24
Vi, pico, nano, whatever your /tmp/gentoo.patch to use my script (including
auto-backup)
Add this to /tmp/gentoo.patch to make it happen...
471a472,473
> elif [ -x $VROO
37 matches
Mail list logo
