On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 07:39:03 -0500, Ola Lundqvist wrote
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:01:03PM -0800, ian douglas wrote:
> > > But maybe one should package util-vserver and upload it as independant
> > > package?
> >
> > Any chance someone has the whole vserver setup in a debian package? I h
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:23:18AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:41:41AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> *SNIP*
> > > >
> > > > as I can see, only vserver-0.27 is affected ...
> > >
> > > Ok I see. I'll stick to 0.26 until these issues has been resolved.
> > > Or
Hi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:41:41AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
*SNIP*
> > >
> > > as I can see, only vserver-0.27 is affected ...
> >
> > Ok I see. I'll stick to 0.26 until these issues has been resolved.
> > Or do you think I should upgrade. The security issues are only for
> > the developm
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:49:55AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:31:18AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:42:55AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > Hi
> >
> > Hi Ola!
> >
> > > Now I finally found this message.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov
Hi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:31:18AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:42:55AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi
>
> Hi Ola!
>
> > Now I finally found this message.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:29:40AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:42:55AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
Hi Ola!
> Now I finally found this message.
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:29:40AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:05:58PM +0100, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> > > Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > > >>Works
Hi
Now I finally found this message.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:29:40AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:05:58PM +0100, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> > Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > >>Works as advertised.
> > >>Tested with kernel-2.6.0-test9 and e2fsprogs headers.
> > >
> >
Hi
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:01:03PM -0800, ian douglas wrote:
> > But maybe one should package util-vserver and upload it as independant
> > package?
>
> Any chance someone has the whole vserver setup in a debian package? I have a
> very minimal installation (200M or so) on a fresh server of 'w
gt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bert De Vuyst
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 3:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Vserver] [Announcement] util-vserver 0.26
>
> On Tuesday 25 November 2003 21:01, ian douglas wrote:
> > > But maybe one should package util-vs
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 21:01, ian douglas wrote:
> > But maybe one should package util-vserver and upload it as independant
> > package?
>
> Any chance someone has the whole vserver setup in a debian package? I have
> a very minimal installation (200M or so) on a fresh server of 'woody', and
>
> But maybe one should package util-vserver and upload it as independant
> package?
Any chance someone has the whole vserver setup in a debian package? I have a
very minimal installation (200M or so) on a fresh server of 'woody', and
would like to get started with vserver on that system. When I FT
> maybe they will update/re-package util-vserver
> for debian on user request ...
bugreport about it not working correctly with vs1.x should be enough.
But maybe one should package util-vserver and upload it as independant
package?
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 7
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:05:58PM +0100, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> >>Works as advertised.
> >>Tested with kernel-2.6.0-test9 and e2fsprogs headers.
> >
> >I'm getting lost,
> > how does util-vserver 0.26 differ from vserver 0.26 package that I got
> >here in debian pa
Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
Works as advertised.
Tested with kernel-2.6.0-test9 and e2fsprogs headers.
I'm getting lost,
how does util-vserver 0.26 differ from vserver 0.26 package that I got
here in debian package?
There are two different versions of the vserver utilities, the original
ones from Jaq
> Works as advertised.
> Tested with kernel-2.6.0-test9 and e2fsprogs headers.
I'm getting lost,
how does util-vserver 0.26 differ from vserver 0.26 package that I got
here in debian package?
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Namagumi namagomi namagoroshi
__
Works as advertised.
Tested with kernel-2.6.0-test9 and e2fsprogs headers.
--
lg, Chris
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
16 matches
Mail list logo
