On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 19:10, Petar [Lists] wrote:
> We all have a pretty good idea that the spam will increase and without
> some form of moderation i.e. subscription, the list resource will
> eventually become useless in that capacity.
>
> My preference is not important. The overall aim is to hav
- Original Message -
From: "Martin List-Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Vserver] Mailing List Future ...
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 18:11, Petar [Lists] wrote:
> > There is no real re
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 18:11, Petar [Lists] wrote:
> There is no real reason /not/ to be subscribed. It takes
> 5 minutes to go through the process and should solve what
> /will/ become an increasing problem.
Actually you are not quite right there. It get's more and more common
to use unique email-
It seems clear that the mailing list is starting see an
increased level of spam that will only get worse as the
bastards work out it is getting through to list subscribers.
For this reason alone I would suggest subscription becomes
compulsory.
There is no real reason /not/ to be subscribed. It ta
It is being repaired, but you can ask me if you want to be unsubscribed
today.
/Martin
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 13:50, Thomas Sattler wrote:
> Hi there ...
>
> First of all. Herbert, I'm sorry. I should have written more than the few
> lines I wrote to declare my request. I try to unsubscribe from
hello,
i'm an active and very pleased user of vserver, but only passive mailing
member. thank you very much for that software.
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
as everybody else i receive a lot of spam everyday, many from mailing
Am Monday 21 June 2004 14:30 schrieb Herbert Poetzl:
> 1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
> instead of a closed (subscription only) list
>
> 2) do we want martin to maintain and further
> improve the existing solution
>
> 3) are we able to tolerate/ignore the unavoidable
>
> so, now the questions I'd like to get answered:
>
> 1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
> instead of a closed (subscription only) list
I subscribe and so does everyone who got this message (since you sent it to
the list) so I suspect this will not have much impact on us who are
On Mo, 2004-06-21 at 14:30, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> so, now the questions I'd like to get answered:
>
> 1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
> instead of a closed (subscription only) list
YES, although this might be argued by some, i think people should not be
forced to subscribe,
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 06:30, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> 1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
> instead of a closed (subscription only) list
I am happy with either solution.
> 2) do we want martin to maintain and further
> improve the existing solution
Yes. The unsubscribe doe
> 1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
> instead of a closed (subscription only) list
i don't care
i can live with the few spam i get from this list
(which doesn't mean i don't think it's annoying though :-) )
> 2) do we want martin to maintain and further
> improve the exist
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
so, now the questions I'd like to get answered:
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
yes
2) do we want martin to maintain and further
improve the existing solution
no problem.
3) are we able to tolerate/ignor
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
hmm, I'd like to ask _all_ current members of this
list, about their opinion
i would not call me a member since i just read along but nevertheless
here's my opinion:
1) do we want an open mailing list (like lkml)
instead of a closed (subscription only) list
yes, alltho
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:15:18PM +0300, Eugeny Zadevalov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm not a very active subscriber, and currently even
> don't use vserver(i switched to freevps two month ago),
> but I read this list to be on the bleeding age of this
> technologies.
sounds interesting ... unfortunate
excerpt from the irc log ...
Did anyone ever suggest or try CRM114?
it's a mail/spam filter right?
Yes, it's unbelievable
http://crm114.sourceforge.net/
does it work under today's spam modalities?
ever since we started using it about 8-10
months ago, we have 0 spam.
Hello!
I'm not a very active subscriber, and currently even
don't use vserver(i switched to freevps two month ago),
but I read this list to be on the bleeding age of this
technologies.
I want to say, that I tyered mostly not of the spam,
but of ppl those post stupid comments about.
Like "i don't
I am in favor of a closed list. I think that if you are going to be asking
questions on the list, you might as well take the time to subscribe, and
if you are a regular, then you'd probably be subscribed anyway. I'm
subscribed to a lot of closed lists (all because of spam), and although it
does ta
Hi there ...
First of all. Herbert, I'm sorry. I should have written more than the few
lines I wrote to declare my request. I try to unsubscribe from the list
since, I don't know, several weeks. It is not because of some spam-mails,
currently I just do not have the time to read the list itself.
I
18 matches
Mail list logo
