Thanks for the feedbacks,
i am particulary interested by the load sharing functionnality.
TRoopy
-- Original Message --
From: Stig Thormodsrud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:42:34 -0800 (PST)
What features specifically from GLBP are you
Hi All,
I have upgraded VC2 to VC3. But when I tried to implement
firewall, all traffic to internet stops. Here is my old and new
firewall configuration:
OLD FIREWALL CONFIGURATION:
firewall {
log-martians: enable
send-redirects: disable
receive-redirects: disable
Hi guys,
being good fellows of Vyatta community, I was wondering if you guys use any
good load balancer solution that is open source, like Vyatta?
I came across a few, but am wondering if you guys can offer some first-hand
experience advice :)
http://www.ultramonkey.org/
Hi Abhilash,
There is an issue in VC3 that restricts the related/ established rule
(your rule number 1) to TCP only. Most likely, the reason your VC2
firewall was working is because return traffic of any type (ICMP, UDP,
TCP, etc.) was allowed back in via rule number 1. Your new rule number
Hi Dave,
When a new master takes over the vip address it sends out a gratuitous arp
so that the hosts can learn the new mac.
stig
Hi,
I been reading a few posts regarding Bug 2350
https://bugzilla.vyatta.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
Doesn't the disable-vmac true option create an issue with
No, no known issues the the cards, and six ports should be fine. I've got
that
many ports in production :-)
Justin
On Jan 10, 2008 2:22 AM, Daren Tay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
just wanna check if there's any known issues for the following network
cards
with Vyatta:
Intel
Can canyone comment more on load balaning vrrp? Active/active style
configuration? Perhaps even noting bgp?
I was not aware with vrrp one could have two routers handling packets :/
-Original Message-
From: Troopy . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:04 AM
To:
All I really know about it is when I set up a trio of Cisco 7301
routers a couple years ago, one of the options I researched was VRRP
and the other was GLBP. I ended up going with GLBP because Cisco's
implementation of it was more stable than its implementation of VRRP.
I know that it
All,
I'm coming from a cisco background and although I've used vyatta at one
production location (using some static routes successfully) I'm having a heck
of a time just getting two routers to talk to each other with RIP. I've read
through the big config guide pdf, but to no avail.
Could
Is broadcast forwarding disabled by default on Vyatta? If not, is there
a way I can disable forwarding of broadcast packets on my Vyatta v3
router?
Thanks,
Shane McKinley
Habersham EMC
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Max wrote:
Can canyone comment more on load balaning vrrp? Active/active style
configuration? Perhaps even noting bgp? I was not aware with vrrp one
could have two routers handling packets :/
This may have changed, but I believe
Hi Aaron,
For NAT translations, there is an enhancement request for a show command that
displays the information you want. You can see some more details in bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.vyatta.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522
An-Cheng
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, on a standard cisco router I
It's disabled, and the current best practices have had it set this way for
quite a while.
See ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2644.txt if you really want the
details :-)
Best,
Justin
On Jan 10, 2008 1:27 PM, Shane McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is broadcast forwarding disabled by
Can canyone comment more on load balaning vrrp? Active/active style
configuration? Perhaps even noting bgp? I was not aware with vrrp one
could have two routers handling packets :/
This may have changed, but I believe Vyatta only supports one VRRP
address
per interface. Consider what
Hi Robyn,
This works for me. Thank you very much.
Thanks and Regards,
Abhilash.S
On Jan 10, 2008 10:11 AM, Robyn Orosz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Abhilash,
There is an issue in VC3 that restricts the related/ established rule
(your rule number 1) to TCP only. Most likely,
15 matches
Mail list logo