I have been pondering the comments from Peter and Eugene and their reasons for
not being able to pay the $30.00 membership fee. I feel the need to say I was
rather disappointed in some of the responses to those comments, and refer to
the comment below. It is not for us to judge what is or
Hi Rosemary,
That's a point well made and we will take it to heart. Thank you for bringing
that up. I think that for the coming year and possibly for the remainder of
this year we should look at pensioner, student, and family subscriptions.
I will repeat a passage from an earlier email that
Apologies. I meant Wendy of course. I am not sure what I was looking at when I
read the name Rosemary and used it in the response.
Regards,
Carlo
On 30/06/2012, at 17:00 , cm wrote:
Hi Rosemary,
That's a point well made and we will take it to heart. Thank you for bringing
that up. I
I apologise for any offence, it was not intended as a slight. However, someone
pays for the server or the ISP fee for the access to the Internet that is a
necessary cost of making discussion between WAMUG members available to all.
Each of us makes a decision from time to time whether to spend
I have been a paid member for many years now and never grudge my annual $30; it
is an investment returned to me many time over in knotty (and simple!) problems
quickly resolved so that there is minimal time wasted/lost on annoying but
critical issues.Apart from direct response to my own
Hi Sev,
Coming from you, a longtime and esteemed member of WAMUG, the comments are
truly appreciated, and your contributions to the list are always welcomed. You
are too much of a gentleman to name any one person, but we know that Ronni has
been particularly determined to solve a number of the
I have no recall of when I found WAMUG, but a good few years ago I am sure.
The $30? Worth it. And the sheer persistence in solving problems on the part
of Ronni and others giving advice is a breath of fresh air in this greedy
litigious society we live in.
The advice wears off on others
Yep, the 58 cents a week is well and truly worth it!
Michael.
On 28/06/2012, at 5:30 PM, Bill Parker wrote:
I have no recall of when I found WAMUG, but a good few years ago I am
sure. The $30? Worth it. And the sheer persistence in solving problems on
the part of Ronni and others
Thank Bill and Michael! We should use the 58 cents a week in publicising the
group. That can also be viewed as one-eighth of the Australian Bureau of
Standards Long Macchiato Coffee. :-)
Best regards,
Carlo
On 28/06/2012, at 17:41 , Michael Hawkins wrote:
Yep, the 58 cents a week is well and
Ha, Michael! Maybe you should have been an Accountant not a lawyer!!
Alex
On 28/06/2012, at 5:41 PM, Michael Hawkins wrote:
Yep, the 58 cents a week is well and truly worth it!
Michael.
On 28/06/2012, at 5:30 PM, Bill Parker wrote:
I have no recall of when I found WAMUG, but a good
10 matches
Mail list logo
