#273: Server crashes if more than 6 players join a game
+---
Reporter: Per | Owner: Per
Type: defect | Status: accepted
Priority: major
#273: Server crashes if more than 6 players join a game
+---
Reporter: Per | Owner: Per
Type: defect | Status: accepted
Priority: major
#273: Server crashes if more than 6 players join a game
+---
Reporter: Per | Owner: Per
Type: defect | Status: accepted
Priority: major
Am Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2009 17:15:45 schrieb Kamaze:
> This might be a good time to bump the major version number?
I do not think someone said something about a major rewrite.
Additionaly the version number should represent user visible changes, and so
far I see no proposal for even on in this t
Hi!
Did you ask Edgewall about this? If not, please do. They have a mailinglist
and a ... bugtracer.
Did you disable any buffering for your logs? Maybe there is something in them,
it just is not written to disk...
Did you try to disable the numerous plugins? Maybe one of them is the cause.
--De
#274: mapLoad() rewrite
+---
Reporter: Per | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 2.2
Component: other
#273: Server crashes if more than 6 players join a game
+---
Reporter: Per | Owner: Per
Type: defect | Status: accepted
Priority: major
#273: Server crashes if more than 6 players join a game
+---
Reporter: Per | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major
This might be a good time to bump the major version number?
Per Inge Mathisen schrieb:
> Hello devs,
>
> We all know that the current and past state of the Warzone codebase is
> a rather sorry excuse for something. There are so many globals all
> over the place, that it is almost impossible to se
As some of you might noticed, Trac is sometimes not available or has
pretty bad response times, without any visible reason. (No notices or
hints about this in the Trac-, Apache- or Syslog)
The only thing I can see, that the Trac process hogs ~100% CPU time
quite often and sometimes, it seems to be
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2009 09:54:59 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:10:22PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
>> > 2) has *at least* one unit test,
>> > 3) uses *no* globals,
> BTW: libtagfile violates this.
> I
Am Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2009 09:54:59 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:10:22PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> > 2) has *at least* one unit test,
> > 3) uses *no* globals,
BTW: libtagfile violates this.
I have a branch here were I fixed that, but I do not remember whether
Am Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2009 09:30:54 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:17:58PM +0100, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > Maybe I may still propose something:
> > Move the current code into /dirty/ and selectively pick cleaned files
> > from there and move them into a sensible locat
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:10:22PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> The code is buggy, and we do not have a process in place to ensure
> that it gets better. I dare say that if the only thing that keeps
> Warzone from sliding from bad to worse in terms of bugs is hard work,
> there is no chance th
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:17:58PM +0100, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Maybe I may still propose something:
> Move the current code into /dirty/ and selectively pick cleaned files
> from there and move them into a sensible location / directory-layout
> in the main tree.
I propose src/dirty/ instead ;-
15 matches
Mail list logo
