#2074: Warzone 2.3.3 test run using Korean translation .mo file failed
--+-
Reporter: urgood2| Type: bug
Status: new| Priority: major
#2075: Korean Translation update
-+--
Reporter: urgood2 | Type: patch (a actual patch,
not a request for one)
Status: new | Priority: major
transi...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 11426
>
> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=11426&view=rev
> Author: transifex
> Date: 2010-08-10 20:30:29 + (Tue, 10 Aug 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> l10n: Updated German (de) translation to 98
On 2010-08-11 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
> Most important question: Why should we trust transifex?
> Especially since that site is an interesting target (getting commit access to
> whatever number of repositories transifex has access to) for attackers.
sf.net can get hacked to, wz2100.net to but sf.net
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
> Who is transifex?
> Why does transifex have commit access?
>
> More questions:
> Why do we need this?
Because all talk about a private Pootle (or similar) installation fell on deaf
ears.
> Hasn't the benevolent dictator model worked out well
Fastdeath wrote:
> On 2010-08-11 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
>> Most important question: Why should we trust transifex?
>> Especially since that site is an interesting target (getting commit access to
>> whatever number of repositories transifex has access to) for attackers.
>
> sf.net can get hacked to,
Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
>> Why do we need this?
>
> Because all talk about a private Pootle (or similar) installation fell on deaf
> ears.
I've never seen such talk, but I don't read any forums except the internal ones
regularly :X And still I wo
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 21:18, Kreuvf wrote:
> And please don't get me wrong: I am deeply convinced that translations can
> only
> be good (aka consistent) as long as there is one maintainer. I've already been
> through this "everybody can edit translations like stupid" shit at Launchpad
>
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 21:49, Christian Ohm wrote:
> Well, it is an experiment currently, to see what it can do. From the looks of
> it, we can assign a maintainer to each language, who can then add others to
> work together, and commit stuff.
Oh, this also means that we can have a large
#2076: random game abort
--+-
Reporter: kai| Type: bug
Status: new| Priority: critical
Milestone: unspecified|Compon
10 matches
Mail list logo
