Hello,
I have been doing some backporting for Buginator today, because he has
such trouble getting into gna.org (a subject worth a discussion of its
own), but I have noticed that he is not the only one who is forgetting
to backport changes. We now have a 2.2 branch that pretty much
everyone
On 2/28/09, Per Inge Mathisen per.mathi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have been doing some backporting for Buginator today, because he has
such trouble getting into gna.org (a subject worth a discussion of its
own), but I have noticed that he is not the only one who is forgetting
to
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:46 PM, bugs buggy buginato...@gmail.com wrote:
I hate to spam the list with the same question again, but is there any
*good* reason why we still support 2.1, and not just go directly to a
2.2 release instead?
Has anyone notice anything that is a show stopper for
Giel van Schijndel wrote:
Tim Baumgartner schreef:
Are there any objections to me porting the Xcode project file fixes in trunk
over to 2.1 branch?
No objections from me, seems like a good idea.
The updates have been ported over to 2.1 branch so Warzone should build on
Tiger
and
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Baumgartner schreef:
Giel van Schijndel wrote:
Tim Baumgartner schreef:
Are there any objections to me porting the Xcode project file fixes in
trunk
over to 2.1 branch?
No objections from me, seems like a good
Ari Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Baumgartner schreef:
Giel van Schijndel wrote:
Tim Baumgartner schreef:
Are there any objections to me porting the Xcode project file fixes in
trunk
over to 2.1 branch?
No objections from
Are there any objections to me porting the Xcode project file fixes in trunk
over to 2.1 branch?
Tim
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Tim Baumgartner schreef:
Are there any objections to me porting the Xcode project file fixes in trunk
over to 2.1 branch?
No objections from me, seems like a good idea.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Warzone-dev
Hi there,
just played the beta 4 and noticed that the readme is not up-to-date (=trunk). I
asked Giel about backporting which resulted in the following problem:
Revisions 5261 and 5281 by Per included readme changes AND code changes. The
question now is if backporting of the code-changes won't
Kreuvf schreef:
just played the beta 4 and noticed that the readme is not up-to-date
(=trunk). I
asked Giel about backporting which resulted in the following problem:
Revisions 5261 and 5281 by Per included readme changes AND code changes. The
question now is if backporting of the
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Further the two revisions by Per, 5261 [1] and 5281 [2], are the changes
to the playlist format.
Solutions are welcome.
As a solution I propose backporting of the two mentioned revisions.
@ Per: I'd like to hear
Let's see if this finally gets through.
- Original Message -
From: Christian Ohm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: warzone-dev@gna.org
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Warzone-dev] Backporting fixes for 2.0.5?
On Saturday, 2 December 2006 at 19:11, Dennis Schridde wrote
- Original Message -
From: Christian Ohm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: warzone-dev@gna.org
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Warzone-dev] Backporting fixes for 2.0.5?
On Saturday, 2 December 2006 at 19:11, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. Dezember 2006 18:51
Am Sonntag, 3. Dezember 2006 03:51 schrieb Christian Ohm:
On Saturday, 2 December 2006 at 19:11, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. Dezember 2006 18:51 schrieb Christian Ohm:
There have been quite a few patches fixing things, or adding small
features while touching only a few lines of
Am Samstag, 2. Dezember 2006 18:51 schrieb Christian Ohm:
There have been quite a few patches fixing things, or adding small
features while touching only a few lines of code in the trunk (the
playlist fix, and the SDL_QUIT and gamma patches, for example). Any
plans to apply those to 2.0 as
On Saturday, 2 December 2006 at 19:11, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. Dezember 2006 18:51 schrieb Christian Ohm:
There have been quite a few patches fixing things, or adding small
features while touching only a few lines of code in the trunk (the
playlist fix, and the SDL_QUIT and
16 matches
Mail list logo
