Watir and firewatir got merged a while back, it ended up as three
gems commonwatir that had code common to both, and then watir and
firewatir that had code unique to IE or Firefox.
The problem you are having is that when you are installing watir it is
going and getting firewatir since that is req
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Lisa Crispin
wrote:
> C:\>gem install watir -v 1.6.2
> ERROR: While executing gem ... (Gem::DependencyError)
> Unable to resolve dependencies: watir requires commonwatir (= 1.6.2);
firewa
> tir requires commonwatir (>= 1.9.2)
Hi Lisa,
try this:
gem install
I posted steps I was using earlier in this thread. (if you don't
still have the mail, just view the thread using the google-groups
website). I have not yet had time to extract them and post them
someplace else such as the wiki or my far too neglected testing blog
On Feb 16, 1:48 pm, Lisa Crispi
Thanks for this info, I am finally now going to do this!
-- Lisa
On Dec 29 2011, 7:57 pm, Chuck van der Linden
wrote:
> I've been doing a bunch of this sort of work at my current job so I
> have the following advice. (something else I should do a blog posting
> about)
>
> Step zero, decide if yo
On Dec 31 2011, 1:09 pm, Jari Bakken wrote:
> It's still useful for people using 1.X. Perhaps create a new
> comparison page for 2.X?
Yes, that's what i was thinking.
Jarmo
--
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before
you ask, be nice.
watir-general@google
It's still useful for people using 1.X. Perhaps create a new
comparison page for 2.X?
Den 31. des. 2011 kl. 10:18 skrev Jarmo Pertman :
> On Dec 30, 10:54 am, Željko Filipin
> wrote:
>> https://github.com/jarib/watir-webdriver/wiki/Comparison-with-Watir-1.X
>
> This list is not up to date anymor
On Dec 30, 10:54 am, Željko Filipin
wrote:
> https://github.com/jarib/watir-webdriver/wiki/Comparison-with-Watir-1.X
This list is not up to date anymore - should we just delete the
statements which aren't true anymore so it would reflect the actual
state? This list seems to be true when compared
On Dec 30, 2:57 am, Chuck van der Linden wrote:
> c) Replace: browser.text_contains with browser.text.include?
> d) Replace: text_field.verify_contains("dfadf") with
> text_field.text.include?("dfadf')
This is not enough, because it returns only false/true. You should
still assert that with
I've been doing a bunch of this sort of work at my current job so I
have the following advice. (something else I should do a blog posting
about)
Step zero, decide if you are going to make the scripts try to run
under both the newer Watir and Watir-Webdriver, or just WW. If the
former I suggest a
