>-Original Message-
>From: hoegsb...@gmail.com [mailto:hoegsb...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Kristian Høgsberg
>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:17 PM
>
>Yeah, a few good points came up in this thread: process separation so
>if one test corrupts memory it doesn't affect others, being able to
>ru
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2 March 2012 21:53, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>> I've written a few in my days. Normally, I keep them ridiculously
>> simple, so the testing code looks something like this (sorry for the
>> sucky indentation; coding in a mua is always
Hi,
On 2 March 2012 21:53, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> I've written a few in my days. Normally, I keep them ridiculously
> simple, so the testing code looks something like this (sorry for the
> sucky indentation; coding in a mua is always crap):
>
> some_test_func(args)
> {
> test_suite t;
>
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Resubmit - Unit test framework for Wayland
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Michael Hasselmann
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 22:34 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>>>> Hi A
>-Original Message-
>From: hoegsb...@gmail.com [mailto:hoegsb...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Kristian Høgsberg
>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 7:33 AM
>To: Michael Hasselmann
>Cc: Eoff, Ullysses A; wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Resubmit - Un
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Morgan [mailto:chmor...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 7:50 AM
>To: Kristian Høgsberg
>Cc: Michael Hasselmann; wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Eoff, Ullysses
>A
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Resubmit - Unit test framework fo
2012/3/2 Kristian Høgsberg :
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Chris Morgan wrote:
>>> I found that a good testing framework can lower the barrier of writing
>>> useful tests. Nice logging and status reports are important I feel. And
>>> if for example you can easily write data driven tests, then
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Michael Hasselmann
wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 22:34 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> Hi Artie,
>>
>> Thanks for starting this. Looks good and certainly when we start
>> adding tests for some of the more complex objects and data structures
>> in the library (w
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Chris Morgan wrote:
>> I found that a good testing framework can lower the barrier of writing
>> useful tests. Nice logging and status reports are important I feel. And
>> if for example you can easily write data driven tests, then testing all
>> possible code paths
> I found that a good testing framework can lower the barrier of writing
> useful tests. Nice logging and status reports are important I feel. And
> if for example you can easily write data driven tests, then testing all
> possible code paths in a critical area becomes straight-forward and the
> te
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 22:34 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Hi Artie,
>
> Thanks for starting this. Looks good and certainly when we start
> adding tests for some of the more complex objects and data structures
> in the library (wl_map would be a good next step), it will be a good
> way to avoi
Hi Artie,
Thanks for starting this. Looks good and certainly when we start
adding tests for some of the more complex objects and data structures
in the library (wl_map would be a good next step), it will be a good
way to avoid regressing functionality. I'm not convinced that we
really need an ex
12 matches
Mail list logo
