Re: [web2py] Re: a very selfish request

2014-10-09 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
sent. Best luck Massimo! 2014-10-09 21:01 GMT-03:00 Michele Comitini : > > After some thinking, I tweeted and, by doing so, I probably put at stake > your promotion, with my bad reputation. Sorry ;-) > > Massimo thank you for you work. Lucky your students. You deserve a load > of tweets! > > >

[web2py] Web2py on CentOS 6.4

2013-07-12 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Hi, On the past 2 days, I've been trying to install web2py on CentOS 6.4. In order to get that done faster, I used the script that is provided within web2py ( setup nginx uwsgi centos64 ). Thing is that I've managed to get everything installed but when I try to run it fails. After taking a close

Re: [web2py] posting here for future reference ...

2013-06-21 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
very good :) 2013/6/21 Massimo Di Pierro > who knows some of us may need the references in this latter one day. > > > http://gawker.com/this-is-how-you-respond-to-an-unjust-cease-and-desist-l-514155395 > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >

Re: [web2py] Re: Howto web2py on Amazon EC2

2013-05-14 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Antonio, on Amazon, everything except port 22 (ssh) is blocked on default. You'll have to go Security Group/Inbound and add the ports you want to open. To access your instance, you can right click it and use "connect" or you can get the public address given to your instance (appears on your manag

Re: [web2py] psycopg2 or pg8000

2013-05-02 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
, 2 May 2013 03:02:26 UTC-5, Marin Pranjić wrote: > >> > >> I remember pg8000 having some bugs and I'm not sure if they are fixed. > >> > >> psycopg2 should be better choice > >> > >> Marin > >> >

Re: [web2py] psycopg2 or pg8000

2013-05-01 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Web Developer > ovidio...@gmail.com >83 8826 9088 - Oi >83 9336 3782 - Claro > Brasil > > > > 2013/5/1 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > >> Are there any advantages on o

[web2py] psycopg2 or pg8000

2013-05-01 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Are there any advantages on one or another or are they basically the same thing? I'm using psycopg2 atm. -- []'s Marco Tulio -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py x java

2013-04-24 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
thanks for taking your time to give your point of view... couldn't read your name though.. are those characters chinese? Could be japanese, but since japanese kanji are based on chinese, it would be a fair mistake by an outsider.. :) 2013/4/24 黄祥 > On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 9:22:24 PM UTC+

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py x java

2013-04-24 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
I'm aware of that... but again, just trying to get enough to tell people who've been working with Java for so long, to understand why web2py... your reasoning sounds easier to understand, although I'd made it slightly diferent: 1. "why a framework and not starting from scratch" 2. "why web2py and n

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py x java

2013-04-24 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
I'm aware of that. but, when you opt to use java on your development environment, you'll there are certain aspects that you'll have to take into account. For ex: Java usually will use more processor and memory, costs on hosting java are way more expensive than any other language/framework, develop

[web2py] web2py x java

2013-04-23 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Does anyone has some written material comparing the development on Java (time, costs, processing, memory, etc) x development on Web2py ? Or if not, but has a solid point of view on that, could you comment a bit ? I wanted some info for a discussion on the use of those technologies on corporative s

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
not blaming you Niphlod. I simply loved the script and the changes made on it... Everything run as expected... I'm just trying to find out what I can do to improve my server response time and performance. At this point I'm pretty much convinced that there's something really weird with the applicat

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
eed addresses pretty much the same things. While some things are related to how we code, some could be done automatically. For ex, Minify CSS, JS and HTML. Resolved the Leverage browser caching by making small changes on nginx conf file (Virtual Host file, called Web2py). Default options would not make u

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
/4/11 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > sounds nginx is not gzip compressing static files, such as css and js. Is > that normal behavior ? > > > 2013/4/11 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > > I'll double check that then... thanks for your help. >> >> >> 2013/4

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
sounds nginx is not gzip compressing static files, such as css and js. Is that normal behavior ? 2013/4/11 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > I'll double check that then... thanks for your help. > > > 2013/4/11 LightDot > >> You're absolutely correct. 6 seconds or

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
I'll double check that then... thanks for your help. 2013/4/11 LightDot > You're absolutely correct. 6 seconds or even db timeouts an just a few > connections mean that something is wrong. It's either much more connections > than it seems or there is a problem in the code or even OS. > > Ricard

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
2013/4/11 LightDot > Are you using db connection pooling and do you cache your queries? That > could help. > > Connection pooling was web2py default (0), wich means not being used. What would be a good value ? About caching queries, no, wasn't doing that either. I'll try to check if this helps

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
about 50 to 90% ... but I see that this is not a problem because of how fast the server usually answers, this seems to be a problem when the page takes more time to load a single page. and it takes around 6 secs to load a page that checks the database. If I open 5 pages at the same time, it's poss

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-10 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
On Apr 10, 2013 9:13 PM, "Ricardo Pedroso" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > wrote: > > > > 2013/4/10 Ricardo Pedroso > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto >

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-10 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
And if you don't agree with that, ok. Just don't ruin it because you don't like me. (Correcting) 2013/4/10 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > (continuing - sent it while not concluded) > > So, if I bring this problem to this list, it's mainly because I believe >

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-10 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
2013/4/10 Ricardo Pedroso > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > wrote: > > > one thing that caught up my atention was that recently (after > system/web2py > > upgrade) I have a higher use of memory and CPU. > > > > I was using

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-10 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
(continuing - sent it while not concluded) So, if I bring this problem to this list, it's mainly because I believe this is the right place for it. And if you don't agree with that, ok. Just ruin it because you don't like me. Cheers, Marco Tulio 2013/4/10 Marco Túlio Cíc

Re: [web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-10 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
loper > ovidio...@gmail.com >83 8826 9088 - Oi > 83 9336 3782 - Claro > Brasil > > > > 2013/4/10 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > >> Hi! >> >> I have the following enviro

[web2py] Server performance (cpu/memory)

2013-04-10 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Hi! I have the following environment: 1. Amazon EC2 instance running Ubuntu 12.10 2. Nginx 1.2.1 3. Web2py 2.4.6-stable+timestamp.2013.04.06.17.37.38 4. PostgreSQL (still 8.4, going to upgrade to 9.1 soon) 5. Installed using setup contained on /scripts directory. Everything is w

Re: [web2py] Re: Upgrading to 2.4.2. breaks virtual field

2013-04-08 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
you're still using 2.4.2 or upgraded to 2.4.6? There were some changes, including bug fixes from one to another... 2013/4/8 Kenneth > Nobody has any pointers how to fix this? I'm using powertable plugin in my > app and if possible don't want to replace it right now. > > > Kenneth > > > Den lörd

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.4.2 is OUT

2013-04-08 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
worked for me 2013/4/8 Luc Chase > + and - definitely don't work on > > (2, 4, 6, 'stable', datetime.datetime(2013, 4, 6, 17, 37, 38)) > > -- > Luc. > > On Sunday, 10 March 2013 14:31:04 UTC, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> This should now be fixed. Can you check? >> >> On Tuesday, 5 March 2013

Re: [web2py] web2py 2.4.5 is OUT

2013-03-19 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Hi! forgive my ignorance what's Travis and what does it do ? (explanation for 3 year old if you can) Also, what benefits I can have by integrating it with Web2py ? Thanks for the info. Cheers, Marco Tulio 2013/3/18 Massimo Di Pierro > Passes all tests using travis.ci including python 2.5/

Re: [web2py] Not to open a can of worms ... about web2py.com

2013-03-18 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
I like the page we have now. But Derek made a few points there... maybe we could start from there... 2013/3/15 Massimo Di Pierro > Somebody suggested web2py.com should look more like http://nodejs.org/ > It would not be difficult to do. Should it be done? > > Massimo > > -- > > --- > You receiv

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.4.3 is OUT

2013-03-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Wow!! Awesome Massimo!! :) WIth all due respect: I love you ! :) Really cool, loved it... Thanks again! 2013/3/11 Massimo Di Pierro > For it to work on existing apps you need to upgrade > controllers/appadmin.py views/appadmin.html (copy them from welcome) and > you need to install pygraphv

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.4.3 is OUT

2013-03-11 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Nice touch on the page, and 2.4.4 seems to fix some issues. What's with that graph model, on models? When I click it, it says "invalid function (appadmin/graph_model)" ... Great job! 2013/3/11 Massimo Di Pierro > 2.4.4 is out and fixes this. Sorry. > > > On Monday, 11 March 2013 15:32:22 UTC

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.4.2 is OUT

2013-03-10 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Hi, I just tested and it still doesn't work. Windows XP Python 2.7.3 Web2py - Current (2.4.2 2013-03-04 03:26:21) (Stable) Browsers: Internet Explorer 8, Chrome (Version 25.0.1364.160 m), Firefox (19.0.2). I haven't tested on other versions of Windows (such as Vista and 7 for ex) and also on Li

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.4.2 is OUT

2013-03-06 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
When using the "New application wizard", cannot add new input row for new tables at "Step 2: Tables" neither by clicking on the plus signal nor by pressing ENTER. Same happens on "Step 3: Fields for table "auth_user" (1 of 1)" and on "Step 4: Pages". Besides that, seems to be working properly...

Re: [web2py] Cant get Janrain working

2012-10-30 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
You could use it on db.py. But instructions placed in 0.py will be read first. 2012/10/26 Simon Carr > Thanks for the Response Marco. > > Can you explain what 0.py is? Are you saying that I should not configure > Janrain in db.py? > > Simon > > > On Friday, 26 October 2012 19:00:33 UTC+1, Marc

Re: [web2py] Cant get Janrain working

2012-10-26 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
on 0.py try something like this settings.login_method = 'janrain' settings.login_config = 'teste:a33eb64c93717b9e34d7ab018563c91a15f1baa2' settings.plugins = [] where teste is your domain on janrain (to get that,k you need to signup janrain engage - http://janrain.com/products/engage/ ). And the

Re: [web2py] Re: PageSpeed, good pratices etc

2012-10-24 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
And again a nice answer. Thanks for that Niphlod. If anyone has anything else to add, please be my guest. :) Thanks! Marco Tulio 2012/10/24 Niphlod > BTW, in web2py we have: > - response.minify_css and response.minify_js (can compact css and js to a > single file, at runtime) > - response.stat

[web2py] PageSpeed, good pratices etc

2012-10-24 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
At this Google page https://developers.google.com/speed/ They talk a little about PageSpeed (Apache Module), PageSpeed Insights, good practices for web development and even about hosted libraries (as a way of making web faster). I'd like to know what you guys think about this, about what we alrea

Re: [web2py] Re: nginx+uwsgi and ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-23 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
And this is why I love this list... :) Thanks for you comments Niphlod! If anyone else has something to add, I'm all ears... :) Cheers, Marco Tulio 2012/10/23 Niphlod > PS: I really don't see the issue. Not every software come as a deb package > (web2py, hello!). > Roberto is very active on

Re: [web2py] Re: nginx+uwsgi and ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-23 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
a bit more stable in updates to come (on >> Ubuntu). >> >> Bruce, if you happen to know what happened this time, would you care to >> share ? :) Seems you know a bit about this particular subject. >> >> Thanks for helping! >> >> Cheers, >> Marco T

Re: [web2py] Re: apache2 vs nginx

2012-10-23 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
rs have reported better > performance with nginx. I like the configuration syntax of nginx better. > > > On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 12:39:18 UTC-5, Marco Tulio wrote: > >> bump >> >> 2012/10/21 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto >> >> Once again, the que

Re: [web2py] Re: nginx+uwsgi and ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-23 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
ginx, or that Nginx+uwsgi becomes a bit more stable in updates to come (on Ubuntu). Bruce, if you happen to know what happened this time, would you care to share ? :) Seems you know a bit about this particular subject. Thanks for helping! Cheers, Marco Tulio 2012/10/23 Marco Túlio Cícero de M.

Re: [web2py] Re: nginx+uwsgi and ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-23 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Didn 2012/10/23 Roberto De Ioris > > > bump > > > > 2012/10/21 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > > > >> Was there any changes on newest release of Ubuntu that would explain > >> uwsgi > >> stop working ? > >> > >> (u

[web2py] Re: apache2 vs nginx

2012-10-23 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
bump 2012/10/21 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > Once again, the question: > > wich one should give better results (performance wise)... > > Also, taking into consideration, Apache2+mod_pagespeed vs Nginx ... > > Hoping to hear your insights about this issue. > >

[web2py] Re: nginx+uwsgi and ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-23 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
bump 2012/10/21 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto > Was there any changes on newest release of Ubuntu that would explain uwsgi > stop working ? > > (using latest web2py and nginx+uwsgi script - 2.2.1 Stable) > > Just wondering... > > -- > []'s > Marco Tulio > -- []'s Marco Tulio --

Re: [web2py] nginx+uwsgi and ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-21 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
it worked well on 12.04. Stopped working on 12.10. Still trying to figure it out... 2012/10/21 Bruno Rocha > I installed today a new webserver on Linode using Ubuntu 12.04. I used the > scripts/setup-ubuntu-nginx and it works very well, I included some > changes on wsgi config file as you ca

[web2py] apache2 vs nginx

2012-10-21 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Once again, the question: wich one should give better results (performance wise)... Also, taking into consideration, Apache2+mod_pagespeed vs Nginx ... Hoping to hear your insights about this issue. Cheers! -- []'s Marco Tulio --

[web2py] nginx+uwsgi and ubuntu 12.10

2012-10-21 Thread Marco Túlio Cícero de M . Porto
Was there any changes on newest release of Ubuntu that would explain uwsgi stop working ? (using latest web2py and nginx+uwsgi script - 2.2.1 Stable) Just wondering... -- []'s Marco Tulio --