Thanks. Looks like lot of Json format data. Reminds me of mongodb.
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 1:20:17 PM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
>
> https://github.com/mdipierro/w3
>
> This is Massimo's example of Ractive.js integration into web2py workflow
>
> Richard
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Ron Chat
https://github.com/mdipierro/w3
This is Massimo's example of Ractive.js integration into web2py workflow
Richard
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Ron Chatterjee
wrote:
> I thought there is an example to share. Sorry.
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 1:07:52 PM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
>>
>> @Ron
I thought there is an example to share. Sorry.
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 1:07:52 PM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
>
> @Ron, we are talking!!
>
> :)
>
> Richard
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Ron Chatterjee > wrote:
>
>> Can we take a sneak peak at that, whats upcoming?:-)
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday,
@Ron, we are talking!!
:)
Richard
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Ron Chatterjee
wrote:
> Can we take a sneak peak at that, whats upcoming?:-)
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:43:03 PM UTC-4, JorgeH wrote:
>>
>> React.js is not that new.
>>
>> They are pretty similar.
>>
>> Here is an ar
Can we take a sneak peak at that, whats upcoming?:-)
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:43:03 PM UTC-4, JorgeH wrote:
>
> React.js is not that new.
>
> They are pretty similar.
>
> Here is an article from May 6th 2014. Exactly 365 days ago.
>
>
> http://blog.ractivejs.org/posts/whats-the-difference-b
React.js is not that new.
They are pretty similar.
Here is an article from May 6th 2014. Exactly 365 days ago.
http://blog.ractivejs.org/posts/whats-the-difference-between-react-and-ractive/
Massimo is already implementing ractive.js into web2py with impressive
accomplishes.
http://www.racti
IMHO ReactJS is no newer than Ractive.js. It's being backed by facebook
since a while ago. I like the author's philosophy (read independence ) and
design simplicity of Ractive.js, things that I appreciate even more in
web2py, but that's a matter of personal taste :-)
2015-05-06 17:23 GMT+02:00 R
That will be a cool concept!:-). I would love to see its done.
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 11:16:58 AM UTC-4, Ramos wrote:
>
> We are talking about integrating web2py with javascript ui frameworks
>
>
> 2015-05-06 16:09 GMT+01:00 Ron Chatterjee >:
>
>> What is this post is all about regarding we
We are talking about integrating web2py with javascript ui frameworks
2015-05-06 16:09 GMT+01:00 Ron Chatterjee :
> What is this post is all about regarding web2py? Just went over my head!
>
> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 10:38:39 AM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
>>
>> I think it will be difficult to ma
What is this post is all about regarding web2py? Just went over my head!
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 10:38:39 AM UTC-4, Richard wrote:
>
> I think it will be difficult to make everyone happy with a given choice...
>
> Michele "agnostic" point is good even if in pratice it may be difficult
> (le
I didnt say Ractive.js
I wrote
React.JS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFvZydtmsxM
2015-05-06 15:38 GMT+01:00 Richard Vézina :
> I think it will be difficult to make everyone happy with a given choice...
>
> Michele "agnostic" point is good even if in pratice it may be difficult
> (let say BS
I think it will be difficult to make everyone happy with a given choice...
Michele "agnostic" point is good even if in pratice it may be difficult
(let say BS2 for instance we were maried with it until recently)
Ractive.js as Massimo imaged is Ractive.js is to Angular.js what web2py is
to Django
There is a new kid on the block
Reactjs
Any experiment with it and web2py ?
Seems a lot less complex than angularjs
Regards
Em quinta-feira, 3 de julho de 2014 09:46:06 UTC+1, Mirek Zvolský escreveu:
>
> Here is a project which lists and compares a little javascript frameworks:
> todomvc.com
>
Here is a project which lists and compares a little javascript frameworks:
todomvc.com
Dne neděle, 15. června 2014 10:34:25 UTC+2 Massimo Di Pierro napsal(a):
>
> Often Angular comes up on this list. I tried it and I was un-impressed.
> Instead today my favorite client-side stack is based on
> angular has routing and other functioinalities that web2py already has.
>
>
Angular was created for implement client side apps, based in RESTful APi,
like mobile apps with ng-cordova or interactive desktop application.
I develop RESTful API in web2py, and the client with NodeJs + angular for
des
In ractive there is nothing equivalent to this;
module.controller('FooController', function($scope, userService){
$scope.data = userService.api.success(function(data) .etc.. );
});
You do not have to bind a controller to a scope. You can still do this:
Hello {{yourName}}!
Notice no ng
> *"I am tempted to say Angular is to Django as Ractive is to web2py.*"
>
On Thursday, June 19, 2014 5:41:31 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
Good way to put it!
Besides, angular has routing and other functioinalities that web2py already
has. It doesn't make much sense having to learn and a
Massimo, in angularjs, if you want use Promises in all the application
scope, you need Factory o services, example :
var module = angular.module('myapp', []);
module.service('userService', function(){
this.api = $http.get('http://example.com/blog/default/index/blog.json');
});
// controller
In this thread there are lots of references to various libraries but they
are not all the same and serve different purposes.
I like sugar.js and ractive.js
sugar.js is similar to underscore.js+moments.js and it extends basic
objects like Date, Array, and String so that they have more methods.
Noelse mentioned Backbonejs yet? working on a project with it now, but do
not care for it too much, I am thinking of switching to AngularJS actually.
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 10:34:25 AM UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> Often Angular comes up on this list. I tried it and I was un-impressed.
>
we can be used web2py with ractive ?
Le lundi 16 juin 2014 05:31:16 UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro a écrit :
>
> I have used Angular for a project and it was a nightmare. I soon moved to
> ractive and did not regret it. Angular forces a scope and, for example,
> promises can only live within the sco
I have trouble with Angular. I'm sure it's mainly because I'm a newbie but
I don't understand why it needs to be so complicated. I think this is
partly behind my wondering is Massimo had ever considered a JavaScript
framework. A web2py of JavaScript frameworks might be really interesting.
It do
Niphlod, for that reason I just use Angularjs...
2014-06-17 8:53 GMT-05:00 Niphlod :
> @backboners: declaring models twice is not something I'd do for living ;-D
>
> --
> Resources:
> - http://web2py.com
> - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
> - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
@backboners: declaring models twice is not something I'd do for living ;-D
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this message becau
Paolo, really backbonejs is very complex, the best solution is
backbone-marionettejs
http://marionettejs.com
2014-06-17 7:14 GMT-05:00 Paolo Valleri :
> Just to name an other one, I've used backbonejs for a project, it was the
> right choice for my purposes. it is very easy to develop a client
Just to name an other one, I've used backbonejs for a project, it was the
right choice for my purposes. it is very easy to develop a client side app
if you have a rest back-end.
http://backbonejs.org/
Paolo
On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:48:03 AM UTC+2, Andrew W wrote:
>
> I want to use the templ
I want to use the template capabilities of web2py for server side script
generation, not just html. From my brief look at the ractive website I'm
wondering if it is any better than what web2py does now. Do I really want
a js library for this for server side templating. I could use node but I
I prefer jqote2 and jquery pesonally. It's one of the fastest out there and
the templates are pretty simple yet flexible.
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 1:34:25 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> Often Angular comes up on this list. I tried it and I was un-impressed.
> Instead today my favorite cl
I have tried both Angular and Ractive.
I choose Ractive every time.
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 3:34:25 AM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> Often Angular comes up on this list. I tried it and I was un-impressed.
> Instead today my favorite client-side stack is based on these:
>
> - jquery.js
> -
Massimo, can you post a ractive example where you had problems doing it
with angular?
Whe should go to examples to understand this angular/ractive issue better
2014-06-16 4:31 GMT+01:00 Massimo Di Pierro :
> I have used Angular for a project and it was a nightmare. I soon moved to
> ractive a
I have used Angular for a project and it was a nightmare. I soon moved to
ractive and did not regret it. Angular forces a scope and, for example,
promises can only live within the scope. That means you cannot use Angular
promises in your own library unless you put all the code in the scope. I
c
Angular is very easy to learn...
#1 http://campus.codeschool.com/courses/shaping-up-with-angular-js/intro
#2 www.*ng*-*book*.com
El domingo, 15 de junio de 2014 03:34:25 UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro escribió:
>
> Often Angular comes up on this list. I tried it and I was un-impressed.
> Instead toda
ractive.js author's ideas about the philosophy of the framework and more,
are nicely writte in a blog.
Many interesting points that were brought up here are discussed in depth
there.
http://blog.ractivejs.org/
mic
2014-06-15 18:19 GMT+02:00 Anthony :
> Have you tried React.js (from Facebook).
If you check the popularity of angular ractive react etc at github you have
a winner:
ANGULAR!!
Big community, videos ,books etc
And
JOBS!!
Em 15/06/2014 17:19, "Anthony" escreveu:
> Have you tried React.js (from Facebook). I haven't tried it but have read
> good things. Supposedly somewhat simi
Have you tried React.js (from Facebook). I haven't tried it but have read
good things. Supposedly somewhat similar to Ractive. Also seems to be more
active (Ractive has had no commits for a month and seems to have limited
user group activity).
Anthony
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 9:39:21 AM UTC-4,
I was sincerely impressed with how many things you can do with Angular, but
the learning curve is too steep.
Then I tried knockout...much better in terms of learning curve, and its
methods to map json objects (resultsets) with view-models couples nicely
with web2py.but the templating lacks t
36 matches
Mail list logo
