[web2py] Re: Idea on web server integration

2010-05-18 Thread blackthorne
P.S.: I am not saying to stop delivering web2py out of the box, this would be an extra option... On May 18, 1:12 pm, blackthorne francisco@gmail.com wrote: hi I don't want to fill this groups with ideas, mainly with ideas that will never see light. Anyway, if someone has more free time

[web2py] Re: Idea on web server integration

2010-05-18 Thread blackthorne
I may no have been as clear as I wanted. First, this is not a Python / C / whatever issue. We like web2py and being pythonic, nothing changes. This is the application layer. The way it's served, wether it is web or telnet or something else it's another layer. There is absolutely no limitation on

Re: [web2py] Re: Idea on web server integration

2010-05-18 Thread Albert Abril
Well.. I think that it's more easy integrate a web2py installer in the cherokee assistant, that at reverse. Maybe, just programming the assistant in cherokee would be an excellent point. I'm not using cherokee in daily production, but I'm a admire the work at this webserver since two years ago.

Re: [web2py] Re: Idea on web server integration

2010-05-18 Thread Albert Abril
By the way, here's a brief tutorial to config it manually. http://www.web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/184 I don't know if it's working now since cherokee released 1.0.0 version. On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Albert Abril albert.ab...@gmail.comwrote: Well.. I think that it's more easy

Re: [web2py] Re: Idea on web server integration

2010-05-18 Thread Timothy Farrell
Oh, well in that case, we just need someone to do it...go for it! On 5/18/2010 8:50 AM, blackthorne wrote: A second step would be to bundle PostgresSQL with web2py + cherokee. I'm a dreamer... On May 18, 2:46 pm, blackthornefrancisco@gmail.com wrote: I may no have been as clear as I