By the way, here's a brief tutorial to config it manually. http://www.web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/184
I don't know if it's working now since cherokee released 1.0.0 version. On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Albert Abril <albert.ab...@gmail.com>wrote: > Well.. I think that it's more easy integrate a web2py installer in the > cherokee assistant, that at reverse. > Maybe, just programming the assistant in cherokee would be an excellent > point. > > I'm not using cherokee in daily production, but I'm a admire the work at > this webserver since two years ago. > The assistants and the web admin are fantastic. > > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, blackthorne <francisco....@gmail.com>wrote: > >> A second step would be to bundle PostgresSQL with web2py + cherokee. >> >> I'm a dreamer... >> >> On May 18, 2:46 pm, blackthorne <francisco....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I may no have been as clear as I wanted. >> > First, this is not a Python / C / whatever issue. We like web2py and >> > being pythonic, nothing changes. This is the application layer. The >> > way it's served, wether it is web or telnet or something else it's >> > another layer. There is absolutely no limitation on running different >> > layers using different programming languages. I may be wrong but I >> > believe that currently web2py just features a webserver to support its >> > web based ide and testing. In no way you are suggested to deploy >> > web2py with cherrypy or its new web server for a serious production >> > environment. Instead, you are suggested to run it on Apache, >> > lighthttpd and cherokee, things like that (as well as you have sqlite >> > by default, but postgressql/... support for other ecosystems). >> > Second, because these are different layers, you keep all the freedom. >> > You can run web2py with cherokee using Python or in jython, Pypy if >> > you can..., no glitches. I don't see a reason to make a difference, >> > just because the web server as a different logo or uses other >> > programming language. >> > Third, I am not suggesting anything against the current model, and by >> > no means I want to end it, I'm talking about a new option, something >> > like what you have with Apache, MySQL, PHP -> MAMP/WAMP/LAMP. So >> > beginners and advanced users can be happy together... >> > >> > On May 18, 1:47 pm, Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > I agree that Cherokee is an impressive server. I think the main >> reason >> > > for not including it is it's non-Pythonic nature. web2py would have >> to >> > > incorporate a formal build process (something it does not current >> have) >> > > for Windows and OSX. It's hard to find a recent Windows build of >> > > Cherokee right now as is. This would also remove the ability for >> web2py >> > > to run on Jython and Pypy (does it currently run on Pypy?). >> > >> > > Currently, web2py is completely Python. It only relies on python >> > > modules. To move beyond that is a significant step that would add >> > > magnitudes of complexity to maintain the same level of features for a >> > > little performance gain and a pretty server interface. >> > >> > > web2py advocates that advanced users should use the web-server that >> best >> > > fits their needs, but maintains a built-in server with an easy >> interface >> > > for beginners. >> > >> > > -tim >> > >> > > On 5/18/2010 7:12 AM, blackthorne wrote: >> > >> > > > hi >> > >> > > > I don't want to fill this groups with ideas, mainly with ideas that >> > > > will never see light. Anyway, if someone has more free time than me, >> > > > you may consider it. >> > > > I was checking a screencast on the awesome Cherokee web server with >> > > > it's great web interface and thinking how cool would it be to have a >> > > > bundle of cherokee with web2py deployed. Actually, cherokee it's >> > > > prepared for that. It has a set of wizards so you can easily deploy >> > > > frameworks like this ( >> http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/cookbook_ror.html >> > > > ). >> > > > A good integration of these things could allow you the full cycle of >> > > > work since the download of the required tools, development, test, >> > > > deploy just using a web browser available on any device these days! >> > >> > > > See it working athttp://www.cherokee-project.com/screencasts.html. >> > >
