Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-10-31 Thread Marcelo Huerta
El jueves, 18 de agosto de 2016, 16:44:05 (UTC-3), Massimo Di Pierro escribió: > > It is possible. web3py is code name for experimental stuff. Mostly new > form/grid logic that will be backported to web2py. > > I read somewhere that you are thinking of ditching SQLFORM (and, I assume, the

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-07 Thread Paolo Valleri
Current master branch passes almost all unittests on python 3.5. If anyone is interested in helping with the final steps, a checklist is here https://github.com/web2py/web2py/issues/1353#issue-159010482 On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 5:43:55 AM UTC+2, jjs0sbw wrote: > > I agree that a better

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-05 Thread joseph simpson
I agree that a better test environment is necessary... In the next few months I will be starting a project with web2py --- or whatever -- A standard test approach and environment will be the first item to be addressed.. What are the basic requirements for a test environment What needs to

[web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-05 Thread Matheus Cardoso
I think the name is the least of our problems. We should debate about what is missing to achieve this "web3py", how many people its demands to accomplish this new framework, main features, such as test environment (!!!), server side rendering or not, etc. On Friday, October 25, 2013 at

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-05 Thread António Ramos
There it goes again another endless round of names Why the hell do we need "py" in the name ? Is that really necessary? why? I think if we forget "py" we may find a lot of nice names and forget a lot of bad ones. For example: Call it Massimo or Pierro... Its what it is in the end right? And

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-05 Thread Pbop
I recommend AbilityPy. People want a framework with rich abilities. The Py gives a nod that this is a python framework (with abilities). Ability preceding Py ensures the framework is at the top of any list of frameworks given the alpha sort of A+B for AbilityPy. The domain is also available

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-09-02 Thread Joe Barnhart
I say pick a new, random name that says nothing about "web" or "python". In Marketing, they like to pick names with no pre-defined meaning and then "define" it to mean what they want. Just choose a name that is easy to pronounce for non-English speakers and has a short, catchy sound. Google

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-08-18 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
It is possible. web3py is code name for experimental stuff. Mostly new form/grid logic that will be backported to web2py. On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 19:09:43 UTC-5, Jason Solack wrote: > > I saw a post on the developer forum that the newer version of web2py was > mostly Python 3 compatible...

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-08-17 Thread Jason Solack
I saw a post on the developer forum that the newer version of web2py was mostly Python 3 compatible... Is it possible that there won't be a need for web3py? -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) -

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2016-08-16 Thread fabio . filhossi
Neither do I. I really like this name !! So, Massimo, has this project been developing yet? On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 9:45:34 PM UTC-2, JorgeH wrote: > > I don't have any problem with the name whatsoever. I like it. > > On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:54:58 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-19 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
I never liked the name either. The original name was Gluon but somebody threatened to sue me for trademark infringement (which was not the case) and I had to change it in a hurry. Not a joke. Massimo On Monday, 19 January 2015 12:17:44 UTC-6, Ramos wrote: i personally hate the name. In

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-19 Thread JorgeH
I don't have any problem with the name whatsoever. I like it. On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:54:58 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: I never liked the name either. The original name was Gluon but somebody threatened to sue me for trademark infringement (which was not the case) and I had

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-19 Thread Tito Garrido
I wouldn't change the name at all... Because it is not related to python version lets just stay with web2py :) On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Massimo Di Pierro massimo.dipie...@gmail.com wrote: py4web? On Sunday, 18 January 2015 15:22:10 UTC-6, Michele Comitini wrote: the 3 in web3py is

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-19 Thread António Ramos
i personally hate the name. In contrast with how much i like the framework. Its a phrase compacted in a single word. People are confusing its name with python versions. Now for a one million dollar question: what does it mean: Web2py3 ? web3py2 ? Regards António 2015-01-19 17:05

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-18 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
py4web? On Sunday, 18 January 2015 15:22:10 UTC-6, Michele Comitini wrote: the 3 in web3py is not related to python3, just as the 2 was not related to python2. We could skip the 3 and use 4 which is much more meaningful :-) look: web 2(to) py web 4(for) py and compare: web 3(???)

Re: [web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-18 Thread Michele Comitini
the 3 in web3py is not related to python3, just as the 2 was not related to python2. We could skip the 3 and use 4 which is much more meaningful :-) look: web 2(to) py web 4(for) py and compare: web 3(???) py?? 2015-01-17 7:22 GMT+01:00 Massimo Di Pierro massimo.dipie...@gmail.com: Nothing

[web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-16 Thread Manny Felicio
Hi Massimo, How are you? I will be starting a new project, so far I think for may reasons, I want to use Python and I like the style of your Web2py. Since, Web3py is already on the air for Python 3 support, Do you think it will be seamless, if let's say, I will use web2py now then when

[web2py] Re: web3py status

2015-01-16 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
Nothing anytime soon. Stick with web2py if it works for you. It works for us. ;-) On Friday, 16 January 2015 09:56:32 UTC-6, Manny Felicio wrote: Hi Massimo, How are you? I will be starting a new project, so far I think for may reasons, I want to use Python and I like the style of your

[web2py] Re: web3py status

2013-10-26 Thread samuel bonill
the main problem is porting dal.py to python 3.x El viernes, 25 de octubre de 2013 21:26:36 UTC-5, elguavas escribió: hi there, i've seen peppered throughout this list references to web3py. i seems like it's mostly the unofficial name of of a concept at this stage, but i also see

[web2py] Re: web3py status

2013-10-26 Thread elguavas
ok. does the dal make large scale use of some particular py2 idioms? is it a strings (unicode in py3) vs bytes problem? is there a work in progress of this or anything else in web3py anywhere? seems like it will be unlikely to eventuate or progress if there is no work relating to this in any

[web2py] Re: web3py status

2013-10-26 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
I would not say it is the main problem. It should be easy to do. It was done once already my Mariano for an earlier version. It is just that nobody has shown must interest in helping do it. We already use a a python 3 compatible syntax. After this is converted it needs testing and I am not sure

[web2py] Re: web3py status

2013-10-25 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
I am sorry to day not much has happened. :-( On Friday, 25 October 2013 21:26:36 UTC-5, elguavas wrote: hi there, i've seen peppered throughout this list references to web3py. i seems like it's mostly the unofficial name of of a concept at this stage, but i also see references to work