Those render exactly the same for me in chrome and ff:
http://jsfiddle.net/8pyDK/
What OS are you testing on? It seems that the perspective is ignored.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
> I opened a new bug report:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109613
>
> Best
I opened a new bug report:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109613
Best,
Marcin
On 12:07 Tue 12 Feb , Levi Weintraub wrote:
> Either way, I'd suggest you take this conversation to a specific bug report
> :)
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Shawn Singh wrote:
>
> > Hi Marcin,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
> We already support custom schemes on Mac by proxying the loading from the
> networking process to the UI process.
I believe we do something like this for the libsoup port as well,
though network process support is still young.
--Martin
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
>
> On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> > I think if we as a community are actively interested in maintaining as
> > many ports as we have (and welcoming new ones) we need to come up with
> > better ways to do so. And clearer p
On Feb 12, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Zeno Albisser wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Balazs Kelemen wrote:
>>
>> You also need IPC because the NetworkProcess serves the needs of the web
>> process. Could you describe why a n
Either way, I'd suggest you take this conversation to a specific bug report
:)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Shawn Singh wrote:
> Hi Marcin,
>
> I wonder if you might accidentally have a "perspective-origin" set
> differently? Or maybe there is something in your code where window size
> tha
On Feb 12, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Zeno Albisser wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Balazs Kelemen wrote:
>
> You also need IPC because the NetworkProcess serves the needs of the web
> process. Could you describe why a network thread in the UI process fit your
> needs bettter? Is it to s
Hi Marcin,
I wonder if you might accidentally have a "perspective-origin" set
differently? Or maybe there is something in your code where window size
that affects how the transforms appear? Maybe you can attach a reduced
simple example of the difference you're seeing? I just whipped up the
fol
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> This entire email thread makes me sad.
>
> I'm sad because we did this to ourselves (our porting systems/policies
> are lacking), we did this very abruptly (the last port we kicked out
> of webkit.org took a year?), and we don't have any
He's dead, Jim:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107522
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> I think it's fine to shoot it in the head now. We do still want to come back
> to it eventually, but it's now apparent that we won't in the next 1.5 months.
>
> - Maciej
+shawnsingh
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
> Dear WebKit-Dev,
>
> I found an interesting difference between implementation of css 3d
> transforms in Gecko (FireFox) and Chromium (WebKit). In Gecko, the
> following css rule:
>
> tranform: perspective(500px) rotateY(90)
On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> This entire email thread makes me sad.
>
> I'm sad because we did this to ourselves (our porting systems/policies
> are lacking), we did this very abruptly (the last port we kicked out
> of webkit.org took a year?), and we don't have any clear p
Dear WebKit-Dev,
I found an interesting difference between implementation of css 3d
transforms in Gecko (FireFox) and Chromium (WebKit). In Gecko, the
following css rule:
tranform: perspective(500px) rotateY(90)
rotates an element (let say an image) so that it is perpendicular to the
viewer, i.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Balazs Kelemen wrote:
>
> You also need IPC because the NetworkProcess serves the needs of the web
> process. Could you describe why a network thread in the UI process fit your
> needs bettter? Is it to support API's related to networking or does it have
> other a
On 02/12/2013 04:51 PM, Zeno Albisser wrote:
Hi,
I have been looking into the NetworkProcess code that has recently
been added to WebKit2. For Qt we are considering moving all the
networking into a separate thread within the UIProcess.
Do you guys think that the NetworkProcess code could be
Hi,
I have been looking into the NetworkProcess code that has recently been
added to WebKit2. For Qt we are considering moving all the networking into
a separate thread within the UIProcess.
Do you guys think that the NetworkProcess code could be designed in a way
to allow running in a separate t
> My point is that I think that lots of ports are part of what makes
> WebKit the goodness it is. Maybe I'm alone here, or at best part of a
> minority, but I wanted us to not lose sight of this idea.
I totally agree. But I also agree with those, who thinks the different
ports should not overburde
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
>
> I am sorry, I should have given more context.
>
> There is visibly a growing discontent in the community about the cost
> imposed from small ports. Just two weeks ago, there were 2 threads
> discussing the cost of "peripheral ports".
> I
18 matches
Mail list logo
